Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. ranks poorly in commitment to fight global poverty
Each year the sharp minds at the foggy bottom think tank known as the Center for Global Development release a very cool and easy-to-use metric for evaluating to what extent wealthy countries are truly committed to fighting poverty and inequity in poor countries.
Its dubbed the Commitment to Development Index and, despite its somewhat boring name, is quite fascinating and enlightening. This years authors, Owen Barder and Petra Krylová (both work in CGDs European office), note that they measure countries not only by how much they spend per capita on foreign aid but also by poverty mitigation efforts within the context of trade, investment, migration, environment, security and technology.
Overall, the United States doesnt measure up so well even though our leaders like to repeat that we spend more (in total) on foreign aid than any other country. True enough, but as this index shows thats a bit of a red herring. As the report notes:
For the third year in a row, Denmark tops the Commitment to Development Index in 2014. Denmark is also the only country which is at or above the average on all seven components. The runners up are Sweden, Finland, the United Kingdom, and Norway. These five countries do well on the index because of their consistently high performance across all policies. The United States is above average in trade, but below average in every other component.
Go to their site and explore their interactive graphic and data. The accompanying graphic above is just a screen grab of the tool from CGDs website. Below is another way to show the rankings:
http://www.humanosphere.org/basics/2015/01/us-ranks-poorly-in-commitment-to-fight-against-global-poverty/
4 of the top 5 countries are Scandinavian countries. Not exactly a surprise but they do set a high standard for the rest of us. Of course, they also set a high standard for domestic income equality and standard of living.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 894 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. ranks poorly in commitment to fight global poverty (Original Post)
pampango
Jan 2015
OP
How does the US rank in fighting domestic poverty, using GDP as a comparison tool?
djean111
Jan 2015
#1
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. How does the US rank in fighting domestic poverty, using GDP as a comparison tool?
And then, of course, there are those who compare our poor to the poor in other countries, saying hey, it could always be worse. After all, lots of our poor have refrigerators and whatnot, and even the homeless sometimes have warm places to sleep, sometimes.
I think we are fighting homelessness in the US by making it illegal. Easier than requiring homeless people to buy a house; more profitable.
pampango
(24,692 posts)2. Great point. The countries that lead in fighting global poverty do also lead on domestic poverty.
You could conclude that countries that care about dealing with poverty are strong in acting against all poverty - domestic and global. Those countries that don't care about dealing with poverty are weak against all poverty - domestic and global.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)3. du rec.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)4. Wow. I had no idea.