So Betrayus was an appropriate change of name

[malaise]

Well done DUers - he betrayed everyone by giving classified information to his woman - one more hoisted...off to prison or to a permanent spot of FUX nonewsonly propaganda. Imagine the CIA head giving away classified information..ReTHUGs are first rate scumbags.

Come on Eric Holder!

[madokie]

1. I laugh

and the reason is I typed betrayus before I'd read others using it so I was on the cusp of this

I never trusted him anyway. In life I've learned to never trust people who suck up and he was a suck up. I don't remember who said it or exactly what he said but someone alluded to the fact that betrayus was a suck up long before it was obvious to the rest of us

[malaise]

2. LOL - indeeed you were

I even remember folks here berating us for using Betrayus. I never trust suck ups. hahahahaha.

[Scuba]

3. He'll never be charged. Holder is too busy busting MMJ users.

[dixiegrrrrl]

4. I thought that Gonzalas was as worthless at tits on a boar

but he had an excuse, he was stupid.

Holder is worse. He actually came out and SAID he was not going to pursue the big banks for their obvious fraud, because they were too big to fail.
He is an accessory to fraud.
And the banks will reward him when he leaves.

[msanthrope]

8. Well, there's enough to charge him, but given the FBI contamination of the case, how would you

proceed?

[Scuba]

9. Is that a recommendation that the FBI be called on the carpet?

I'm sure heads will roll if they've "contaminated" any case.

Although it's interesting that Chelsea Manning was still charged when the Commander in Chief of the entire US military contaminated his case.

[elias49]

10. Good point. nt

[L0oniX]

5. Wasn't it MoveOn that first came out with that name?

[malaise]

6. Could have been because they were attacked as well

but several DUers also called him that

Here's something on the MoveOn Ad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org_ad_controversy

The MoveOn.org ad controversy began when the US anti-war liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org published a full-page ad in The New York Times on September 10, 2007, accusing General David
H. Petraeus of "cooking the books for the White House". The ad also labeled him "General Betray Us".[1] The organization created the ad in response to Petraeus' Report to Congress on the Situation in Iraq. MoveOn hosted pages on its website about the ad and their reasons behind it from 2007 to June 23, 2010. On June 23, 2010, after President Obama nominated General Petraeus to be the new top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan (taking over the position from retiring General Stanley McChrystal), MoveOn erased these webpages and any reference to them from its website.[2]

[msanthrope]

7. There's enough to charge him, but this would be a difficult prosecution given the FBI angle....

http://gawker.com/5960202/a-flowchart-of-the-petraeus-affairs-love-pentagon-from-the-shirtless-fbi-agent-to-chuck-klosterman

[NobodyHere]

11. Under the UCMJ

he can still be charged with an Article 134 for adultery.

However justice only applies to the poor in this country.

[malaise]

12. No punishment NOT JUSTICE only applies to the poor

The poor are screaming for justice across the globe