Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 02:59 PM Jan 2015

"How Clint Eastwood Ignores History in ‘American Sniper'"

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/01/08/clint-eastwood-ignores-history-american-sniper/

"The problem is that the film makes no attempt to tell us anything beyond Kyle’s limited comprehension of what was happening. More than a decade after America invaded and occupied Iraq, and long after we realized the war’s false pretense and its horrific toll, we deserve better. There’s a dilemma at work: a war movie that is true of one American’s experience can be utterly false to the experience of millions of Iraqis and to the historical record. Further, it’s no act of patriotism to celebrate, without context or discussion, a grunt’s view that the people killed in Iraq were animals deserving their six-feet-under fate. When the movie’s villain, an enemy sniper named Mustafa, was killed by Kyle, the crowd at the theater where I was watching broke into applause.

If Cooper, the film’s star, means what he said about its lack of politics, he fails to understand how war movies operate in popular culture. When a film venerates an American sniper but portrays as sub-human the Iraqis whose country we were occupying—the film has one Iraqi who seems sympathetic but turns out to be hiding a cache of insurgent weapons—it conveys a political message that is flat wrong. Among other things, it ignores and dishonors the scores of thousands of Iraqis who fought alongside American forces and the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who were killed or injured in the crossfire."
96 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"How Clint Eastwood Ignores History in ‘American Sniper'" (Original Post) Dawson Leery Jan 2015 OP
sad thing is many folks will think this is honest it will shape the dumb little minds dembotoz Jan 2015 #1
Will? Future tense? nxylas Jan 2015 #17
I think it's arguably an anti-war film uhnope Jan 2015 #38
It is, but only because it isn't about the real Chris Kyle. Pholus Jan 2015 #51
I haven't seen it. But, from what I've heard it's certainly not "Paths of Glory" or "Catch-22". Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #2
Kick! Heidi Jan 2015 #3
It's not a trial, a history course, a court record, or a deposition. It's a folk tale. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #4
I lose my shit over lots of other movies JonLP24 Jan 2015 #8
Man, Star Wars must have pissed you off for years. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #37
Was Star Wars ever intended to be a "true story" JonLP24 Jan 2015 #40
Hang on. Rocky IV from 1985 made it easier to hate Chavez? Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #41
Anti-communist propaganda for years JonLP24 Jan 2015 #45
Third option: I think your point has no merit. nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #46
By cherry picking and making an irrelevant argument to it? JonLP24 Jan 2015 #53
No, by rejecting it out of hand. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #64
Uhh JonLP24 Jan 2015 #71
Whoa - FOUR people? OMG!!! Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #75
I agree with they affect people & agree with sundry ways as well JonLP24 Jan 2015 #80
Because he SAID so. Dont you get it? :) 7962 Jan 2015 #69
I was referencing the other arguments before he SAID that JonLP24 Jan 2015 #73
Has anyone ever disagreed with you, or are you a special snowflake who can't imagine such horror? nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #76
Do you ask irrelevant questions? JonLP24 Jan 2015 #77
"Was Star Wars ever intended to be a "true story"" Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #82
LOL JonLP24 Jan 2015 #85
It's a folk tale used to shape public opinion. jeff47 Jan 2015 #13
Good point volstork Jan 2015 #33
Yeah, like The Longest Day and the Battle of the Bulge whipped up all that anti-German hatred. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #42
Do you realize the power of film and pop culture edhopper Jan 2015 #28
I also realize the power of completely overreacting. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #35
Damn Yankees!! 7962 Jan 2015 #70
A folk tale! A folksy folk tale for FOLKS!!!! We snipered some folks, folks! sibelian Jan 2015 #79
Powerful. Insightful. nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #81
Well, it is a bit, isn't it? sibelian Jan 2015 #84
The Iraqi resistance in Anbar and other parts of the Sunni Triangle had every KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #5
kick Dawson Leery Jan 2015 #6
Your country being invaded tends to create resistance. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #11
I hated George W. Bush about as much as I've hated any political figure since KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #14
Clint needs to make a movie showing patriotic Iraqis resisting invasion as best they can on point Jan 2015 #7
He did a very good job with World War II movies JonLP24 Jan 2015 #9
Yes, he did a great job there. Needs to do same in Iraq. Tell both sides on point Jan 2015 #12
"Letters From Iwo Jima" is exceptional, well worth seeing. Paladin Jan 2015 #24
+1 Dawson Leery Jan 2015 #23
He hides the fact the entire war was a lie, and the audience is in shock after with all that the gun porn Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #10
The achievement of the Iraqi resistance in defeating us is arguably even greater than KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #15
"defeating us"? Nice fantasy world you got there. 7962 Jan 2015 #72
They drove us out. They occupy the battlefield and we don't. We failed to KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #83
Makes me want to watch Starship Troopers again. RoccoRyg Jan 2015 #16
Probably should read the book. jeff47 Jan 2015 #25
It does both mock and pay homage to the source material REP Jan 2015 #32
A genuine cult classic. Paladin Jan 2015 #27
When that first bullet flies past your head you really don't give a shit about glasshouses Jan 2015 #18
And the same for Iraqis that were innocent but targeted as savages. n/t Dawgs Jan 2015 #22
That's why winning hearts and minds is always a failed strategy glasshouses Jan 2015 #74
That's why we weren't greeted as liberators. We had to give them "Shock and Awe" aka "terrorism" arcane1 Jan 2015 #44
If Eastwood is trying to whitewash the Iraq clusterfuck tularetom Jan 2015 #19
Yes edhopper Jan 2015 #30
I've been successfully ignoring Clint Eastwood PatSeg Jan 2015 #20
Excuse me while I ask a chair Fearless Jan 2015 #21
Darn it...missed this reply. He was the idiot. Good answer. libdem4life Jan 2015 #56
Pukes, Baggers, Righties, Fundies.... SoapBox Jan 2015 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #29
Unfortunately, we have a whole lot of idiots in this country sailfla Jan 2015 #78
"When a film venerates an American sniper... ND-Dem Jan 2015 #31
Piss on the movie OldRedneck Jan 2015 #34
"War is sweet to those who haven't tasted it." — Erasmus n/t VWolf Jan 2015 #36
Lee made that comment to Longstreet as they stood on the heights at Fredericksburg, KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #86
Why would the film have any obligation whatsoever to that broader narrative? Lizzie Poppet Jan 2015 #39
I'm not a fan of Clint as a person, but the man can direct a great movie. FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #43
Gran Torino was another. HappyMe Jan 2015 #49
I saw it. I liked it. Not everything in my life has to be a deep political experience. Happyhippychick Jan 2015 #47
I won't give you any shit. HappyMe Jan 2015 #50
Maybe that's why we're both happy (screen names)? Happyhippychick Jan 2015 #52
Could be. HappyMe Jan 2015 #55
Exactly, why would anyone on a democratic site be outraged over whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #58
Yes, it is being billed as an accurate documentary HappyMe Jan 2015 #62
As a fan, you're in good company whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #63
A fan of what? Wars? Assholes? HappyMe Jan 2015 #65
A fan of the movie n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #66
I haven't seen it yet. HappyMe Jan 2015 #67
There were TWO HUGE problems with the movie. Pholus Jan 2015 #48
The kind of person that isn't into self-reflection JonLP24 Jan 2015 #60
Wasn't he the Dude who had a "conversation/monologue" with a chair on National TV? n/t libdem4life Jan 2015 #54
Eastwood was makeing a movie based on a book writen by Kyle. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #57
I think the title of the movie should be DesertDawg Jan 2015 #59
I'm not a big fan of war movies, Blue_In_AK Jan 2015 #61
The movie is about Kyle, not the war or the nonsense that led to it 7962 Jan 2015 #68
kick Dawson Leery Jan 2015 #87
KICK Cha Jan 2015 #88
Eastwood was second choice to direct and Jason Hall wrote the script not Eastood Ellipsis Jan 2015 #89
But it's the only war we have!!! Enthusiast Jan 2015 #90
Clearly, Cooper is just another ho. Like Eastwood. Bought and paid for by the PTB. nt valerief Jan 2015 #91
I know it's not the case en masse Bigredhunk Jan 2015 #92
Another reviewer reviewing the movie he didn't see and not the movie he saw... lame54 Jan 2015 #93
How I'm going to ignore the critics and go see this movie lame54 Jan 2015 #94
Well this is a guy who debated a chair, and lost. gollygee Jan 2015 #95
LOL! Dawson Leery Jan 2015 #96

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
51. It is, but only because it isn't about the real Chris Kyle.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

It was a binary choice: make an accurate account, or sell tickets by playing to stereotypes.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
4. It's not a trial, a history course, a court record, or a deposition. It's a folk tale.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:13 PM
Jan 2015

I cannot believe how many people are losing their shit over a movie.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
8. I lose my shit over lots of other movies
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:24 PM
Jan 2015

such as "Catch Me if You Can" he escapes out of the airplane bathroom but in the movie he did all that to look outside his mom's window during Christmas where he was easily apprehended when in reality he was hiding in Canada. I also thought the movie should have included his escape from prison where he posed as an undercover prison inspector (which made sense at the time as the prison was hit by undercover prison inspectors shortly before).

Also the many Grisham movies are so far the book loses my mind such as The Firm. Over-billing are you so serious?

I think the true story or book version is always far more interesting than the movie changes which bugs me. Also a lot people put a certain value on movies that are a "true story" but "true story" in American Cinema means something very different to me than most people. With a movie that deals with subjects such as Iraq war in the context with the current conflicts in the very same country the stakes are higher so I have no problem with people in bringing awareness or redirecting to more honest flicks such as Generation Kill.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
37. Man, Star Wars must have pissed you off for years.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:04 PM
Jan 2015

I mean, how true to the actual history of the Force were they? Not very, if you ask me.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
40. Was Star Wars ever intended to be a "true story"
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:14 PM
Jan 2015

I actually couldn't ever watch it all the way through without getting bored but I think you get my point or you somehow completely missed it.

Fiction could bother me, for example there was anti-communist propaganda in films for years, even subtle kinds like in Rocky IV which made it easier for the public support to replace regime changes in Southern America and also made it easier to hate Chavez because he wouldn't play ball with Venezuelan oil or justify the failed regime change.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
45. Anti-communist propaganda for years
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:24 PM
Jan 2015

Rocky was cited as an example, anti-communist propaganda in American cinema had no change in influencing public opinion in regime changes in Southern American (many of which took place under Reagan and even outside including arming, training, & financing Al-Qaeda to fight the USSR in Afghanistan)?

You missed or either deliberately missed my point again.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
53. By cherry picking and making an irrelevant argument to it?
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jan 2015

Now we are making another argument instead of arguing the power of propaganda which you seem to be vastly underestimating. Either way, you still aren't discussing why it has no merit.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
64. No, by rejecting it out of hand.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:51 PM
Jan 2015

Sorry if it stuns you, but I don't think this movie affects a damn thing, and I am skeptical that any of those movies had any of the effects you claimed.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
71. Uhh
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:06 PM
Jan 2015


You could certainly make the argument they felt that way before the movie but it was likely propaganda that caused them to feel that way in the first way but these are people claiming what effects the movie had on them and they aren't positive. I'm sure it would be easier to justify a ground war in Southwest Asia & gain support from those people (as well as others, especially from those who don't have the slightest clue what is really going on & what war was really like & what the Department of Defense did over there)

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
75. Whoa - FOUR people? OMG!!!
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:12 PM
Jan 2015

Sorry, unmoved. Movies affect people in sundry ways, and always have. The difference now is that anyone can go on social media and blather about it.

Did you know that Titanic caused a surge in people taking cruises?

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
80. I agree with they affect people & agree with sundry ways as well
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:36 PM
Jan 2015

Take Birth of a Nation, it was a success at-the-time & also credited with the rebirth of the KKK. It was also was known for several innovations & advancements in American cinema and one of the ways is how they told the story. However if I watched the movie I'd likely get pissed off, another it would confirm prejudices, another it would sway in a negative way though the movie is so old it wouldn't have nearly the same effect like a lot of other old movies did at-the-time.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
73. I was referencing the other arguments before he SAID that
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:07 PM
Jan 2015

If he felt my claim had no merit why was he making illogical arguments? I got the answer to that so no need to clarify things for me further.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
76. Has anyone ever disagreed with you, or are you a special snowflake who can't imagine such horror? nt
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:13 PM
Jan 2015

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
77. Do you ask irrelevant questions?
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:24 PM
Jan 2015

You could easily answer the first question by performing a search & you're still constructing illogical fallacies to the second one.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
82. "Was Star Wars ever intended to be a "true story""
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:05 PM
Jan 2015

When "Return of the Sith" came out the Right Wing was screaming about how George Lucas was portraying the rise of the Empire using a falsified war and promises of security with the Bush Administration and Iraq. Lucas corrected the record by saying it wasn't Dubya at all. The parallel he was using was the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

After that the silence from the Right was deafening.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. It's a folk tale used to shape public opinion.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:34 PM
Jan 2015

That's a very large part of why we have folk tales, and why we change them over the decades since they were first told.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
42. Yeah, like The Longest Day and the Battle of the Bulge whipped up all that anti-German hatred.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:19 PM
Jan 2015

Except it didn't.


edhopper

(33,573 posts)
28. Do you realize the power of film and pop culture
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:34 PM
Jan 2015

to shape public perception?

Or were you not around for the whole "24" / torture debate?

Would it not upset you if this movie lead the majority in this country to think going into Iraq was a good thing?

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
35. I also realize the power of completely overreacting.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:53 PM
Jan 2015

No one will see this move and have their minds changed about Iraq, one way or the other.

Oh, wait. There was that second Civil War that broke out after Gone With the Wind came out.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
5. The Iraqi resistance in Anbar and other parts of the Sunni Triangle had every
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:14 PM
Jan 2015

right and even a duty to resist by armed struggle our illegal occupation.

End of story.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
14. I hated George W. Bush about as much as I've hated any political figure since
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:38 PM
Jan 2015

becoming an adult. But had Iraq invaded us on charges that we had WMDS -- which we arguably do in the form of our nuclear arsenals -- without first getting approval from the U.N. Security Council, I would have joined the resistance to Iraq's illegal invasion and occupation.

Where it gets morally tough and complicated is that Americans who knew the score had a responsibility to support the Iraqi resistance to their own government's illegal invasion and occupation, even if supporting the Iraqi resistance meant opposing their own military. I resolutely refused to say "I support our troops" because that was just code for saying "I support an illegal invasion and occupation."

If there's ever any justice in my life, I would hope to see Bush, Cheney and the architects of that war brought up on war crimes charges before some competent international authority. I'm not holding my breath.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
9. He did a very good job with World War II movies
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jan 2015

I like the honesty portrayed in Flags of our Fathers & heard great things about Letters from Iwo Jima which the settings of the two movies are from the same battle, but told from different perspectives such with the Japanese soldier in Letters from Iwo Jima.

on point

(2,506 posts)
12. Yes, he did a great job there. Needs to do same in Iraq. Tell both sides
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jan 2015

Even though I think US side has no redeeming qualities. Good soldiers doing as they were told by their corrupt greedy political war criminals. That's the tragedy that needs to be told.

Paladin

(28,252 posts)
24. "Letters From Iwo Jima" is exceptional, well worth seeing.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:25 PM
Jan 2015

There's no use pretending that Eastwood doesn't have a genuine gift for film directing. That said, I don't intend on seeing the sniper movie.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
15. The achievement of the Iraqi resistance in defeating us is arguably even greater than
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:40 PM
Jan 2015

that of the Vietnamese who had massive support from the USSR and People's Republic of China. The Iraqi resistance had to do it on their own.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
83. They drove us out. They occupy the battlefield and we don't. We failed to
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:06 PM
Jan 2015

secure any strategic gains and, arguably, strengthened Iran.

Please tell me how the U.S. was not defeated. (See also Vietnam.)

RoccoRyg

(260 posts)
16. Makes me want to watch Starship Troopers again.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 03:55 PM
Jan 2015

That movie is one big sci-fi parody of propaganda war films. It shows you everything to look for, such as lost loves, heroic sacrifices, ultra-nationalist television, weakling wartime opposition, etc.

It's funny how the original author, Robert Heinlein, was an ultra-right winger who really thought that kind of society was the right way to go. The movie mocks and pays homage to his vision perfectly.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
25. Probably should read the book.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:28 PM
Jan 2015

Since the book is the opposite of what you claim.

It's a little like claiming Orwell loved surveillance states because of 1984.

REP

(21,691 posts)
32. It does both mock and pay homage to the source material
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:49 PM
Jan 2015

The movie is satire - fierce in parts and campy in others - but at the same time, it does manage to pay homage of sorts to the dead-serious source material. Its ultimate conclusion and message is 180 degrees from Heinlein's (one reason why the movie works), but through many watchings, it's always struck me as the work of someone who loved the book as a kid, then grew up and really understood and disagreed with the message.

Paladin

(28,252 posts)
27. A genuine cult classic.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jan 2015

It created some controversy when it came out, due to the Nazi overtones of the military. Neil Patrick Harris looks striking in his black SS-styled uniform.....

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
18. When that first bullet flies past your head you really don't give a shit about
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:01 PM
Jan 2015

your limited comprehension on why you are there.

Politics just seem to go out the window....know what I mean

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
44. That's why we weren't greeted as liberators. We had to give them "Shock and Awe" aka "terrorism"
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

We were greeted as the invaders that we were.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
19. If Eastwood is trying to whitewash the Iraq clusterfuck
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:02 PM
Jan 2015

He made a piss poor choice of a character to use as his symbol. It's hard to humanize somebody who lies about shooting two guys at a gas station, about picking off dozens of American citizens from the top of the super dome, and who libels a fellow Seal to the extent that it costs his estate several million dollars.

A fake hero for a fake war. Sad that this is the best they could do.

PatSeg

(47,405 posts)
20. I've been successfully ignoring Clint Eastwood
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jan 2015

for a long time now (before the republican convention). I hate the fact that if he puts his name on anything, it is automatically considered an Oscar contender. Though he has made some excellent films, his ego tends to get in the way far too often and he frequently gets far more credit than he has earned.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
21. Excuse me while I ask a chair
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:15 PM
Jan 2015

If I give a damn about him at all.


Nope. Thought so. Let him rot and his terrible movie with him..

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
26. Pukes, Baggers, Righties, Fundies....
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:29 PM
Jan 2015

They just make shit up and play it as truth.

Problem is, we have masses of mindless, STOOPID lemmings that can't begin to think for themselves and believe it.

Response to Dawson Leery (Original post)

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
31. "When a film venerates an American sniper...
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:40 PM
Jan 2015

When a film venerates an American sniper but portrays as sub-human the Iraqis whose country we were occupying...—it conveys a political message that is flat wrong."

= indeed.

and everyone knows it's true. The only way to get around that inconvenient truth is by lying and fictionalizing and using music and other tools for propagandistic purposes.

Eastwood's made a propaganda film for the US military. A clever one, but it's propaganda.

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
34. Piss on the movie
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 04:52 PM
Jan 2015

I haven't seen it, won't see it, not even a little bit interested in it.

I served 28 years in the Army -- 1967 - 1995, including two tours in Vietnam, both in the bush. There's nothing glorious about war, sniping, bobby traps, ambushes, body bags, missing arms and legs, chests peeled open, tops of heads blown away, 19-yr-old kids crying for their mother with their last breath.

Clint was never there, that's why he celebrates it.

"War is at best barbarism. . . . Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell."
William T. Sherman


"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it."
Robert E. Lee

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
86. Lee made that comment to Longstreet as they stood on the heights at Fredericksburg,
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:23 PM
Jan 2015

watching Union troops be mowed down as they advanced uphill against fortified and prepared Confederate positions. Longstreet had some choice words to say about Lee after Appomattox and I refuse to venerate Lee any longer.

Have you ever read James Jones' From Here to Eternity (or seen the film version with Burt Lancaster and Montgomery Clift)? If you have not, I strongly recommend either or both. (Deborah Kerr and Donna Reed are also not hard on the eyes

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
39. Why would the film have any obligation whatsoever to that broader narrative?
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:12 PM
Jan 2015

It's a biographical film about an individual. It's not intended to be anything else, and if some viewers read broader political elements into it that happen to be historically inaccurate, then that fault likes with an insufficiently-informed viewer, not the film. They shouldn't be looking to entertainment-oriented movies for broad and balanced historical information. That's what actual historical sources are for.

For a film with a narrow perspective, as any film focused on a single individual's experience will inevitably be, to attempt to provide a remotely adequate historical overview would require a massive amount of screen time be devoted to such exposition. That would, obviously, completely destroy the film in terms of it being an effective story.

Does the film present a seriously skewed perspective on Iraqis, painting them as subhuman savages? Apparently it does. But the film's story is also told from the perspective of someone who believed exactly that, if his statements are accurate reflections of his views.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
43. I'm not a fan of Clint as a person, but the man can direct a great movie.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

Letter from Iwo Jima was a great war film.

I doubt I'll see American Sniper, but a good film doesn't have to be a lecture on politics, war, or focused on how the masses will react.

Man, never thought I'd be reduced to defending Eastwood....

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
49. Gran Torino was another.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:29 PM
Jan 2015

I'm probably going to see this movie, as well as Selma, and The Gambler.

It isn't being billed as a documentary or a history of the Iraq war. It's one guy's story.

edit to add --

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6106899

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
47. I saw it. I liked it. Not everything in my life has to be a deep political experience.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:25 PM
Jan 2015

Now I'm sure I'll catch a ton of crap.

I feel really sorry for those who are in constant outrage over every fucking thing. It's a movie. See it and enjoy it or don't.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
58. Exactly, why would anyone on a democratic site be outraged over
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jan 2015

a blatant propaganda film from a republican douchebag, depicting a nutbar sniper killing everything in sight in a country that didn't attack us?

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
65. A fan of what? Wars? Assholes?
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:54 PM
Jan 2015

Are you saying I am like those tweeting assholes?

If you are you couldn't be more fucking wrong. Sorry, I am not expressing the "appropriate" outrage.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
67. I haven't seen it yet.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:01 PM
Jan 2015

I will be a fan or not after I see it. I prefer to do that, rather then jump on the knee jerk band wagon with others that haven't seen the movie.

Seems people should stick to Disney and stupid cat videos. Those are all the pretty formulaic and there's no need to see them before forming an opinion.

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
48. There were TWO HUGE problems with the movie.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:27 PM
Jan 2015

1) Clint seemingly can make only ONE kind of war movie -- the tried-and-true formula requires a "reluctant hero." The opening kill scene with the mother and child is meant to display the moral ambiguity that would be the basis of Kyle's PTSD but in the book, Chris Kyle never describes as much as a twinge of ambiguity. His lack of self-reflection is a large part of the reason he could be effective in his role. As a soldier in a war zone, an accidental kill of an innocent is a better result than losing a friend because you didn't shoot. But that makes for an unsympathetic character, so selling tickets requires a small change to the story.

2) Kyle's post-military exploits seem to involve him getting caught in lie after lie, most notably about supposedly dead carjackers, punching out Jesse Ventura and Katrina looters. I blame the violence and military worshiping subculture that rises up around guns for that. Kyle came back from Iraq a legend for good reason, but here he was just a regular guy unless he cashed in. Just play to the subculture and get a constant paycheck as long as he could keep getting his name mentioned. Yes, I am insinuating that functionally he was basically a Kardashian -- controversy ensures cash. The movie could not get into that of course, because the formula demands that "reluctant heroes" eventually find a peace. "Craft International" just isn't the kind of business a "reluctant hero" would create.



JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
60. The kind of person that isn't into self-reflection
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jan 2015

or has a twinge of ambiguity are usually sociopaths which I feel Kyle is based on the many lies, "n--" which he used to describe the looters, "savages", as well as the no self-reflection, etc.

I agree they certainly would make excellent snipers as well as lawyers & salesman due to their indifference to morality but since it isn't a sociopaths fault they're sociopaths so I can't blame him for that either, I think he is just who is though the violence & subculture can be blamed on sociopaths and/or apathy.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
57. Eastwood was makeing a movie based on a book writen by Kyle.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jan 2015

which itself was written from the POV of Kyle.

He wasn't makeing a documentary.

And we are talking about a guy who speaks to chairs.

DesertDawg

(66 posts)
59. I think the title of the movie should be
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jan 2015

American Liar, Tales from America's Biggest Bullshitter. Normally I respect the troops, but this clown was a typical Redneck loudmouth caught telling bullshit stories(Knocking out Jesse Ventura in California that never happened), going off of that whopper and the fact that actual Sniper badasses never brag about what they do(they have no need), and going after the fact this clown self pegged himself "the World's Deadliest Sniper" it's safe to say he was full of shit and overcompensating. Fuck him and fuck this bullshit movie.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
68. The movie is about Kyle, not the war or the nonsense that led to it
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jan 2015

No movie ever gets it all right. Even with Selma, many have criticized how LBJ was portrayed as being ambivalent about the civil rights movement, when records show he was supportive of it early on. Thats just the way it goes with the movies.

Ellipsis

(9,124 posts)
89. Eastwood was second choice to direct and Jason Hall wrote the script not Eastood
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:08 PM
Jan 2015

Ya got a problem? ...bitch at the writer.

After losing Steven Spielberg as director, Warners Bros. has acted quickly to find a director for “American Sniper” with Clint Eastwood in talks to helm the biopic starring Bradley Cooper.

Jason Hall penned the script for “Sniper” about a Navy SEAL recounting his military career that included more than 150 confirmed kills. Film is based on the book “American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History” by Chris Kyle, Scott McEwan and Jim DeFelice.

Cooper’s production company 22nd & Indiana Pictures and Andrew Lazar’s Mad Chance Productions optioned rights to the book a year ago.

Eastwood is in production on the adaptation of “Jersey Boys” and would jump to “American Sniper” once the musical finishes filming.


http://variety.com/2013/film/news/clint-eastwood-american-sniper-warners-1200585301/

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
90. But it's the only war we have!!!
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 07:36 AM
Jan 2015

We have to celebrate the heroism! No matter how fucking twisted it is. You know, if we are to maintain this military culture (mentality) so we will be prepared for future war already being planned (2017).

If I'm not mistaken Eastwood made a movie about Grenada. FUCKING GRENADA! [URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

Don't we think the CIA/American taxpayers funded the entire thing? Come on!

Bigredhunk

(1,349 posts)
92. I know it's not the case en masse
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:42 PM
Jan 2015

But the way this movie is doing at the box office and the way fans are reacting to it (A+ Cinemascore, raving to others), it feels like we're back in 2003. My friend is a teacher. She was telling her students and peers about "Selma" yesterday (MLK Jr Day) at school. Every time she brought it up, someone (student, peer) would bring up "Sniper" and they'd all start talking about that. It feels a lot like the "hoo rah" days up to/at the beginning of the Iraq invasion.

lame54

(35,285 posts)
93. Another reviewer reviewing the movie he didn't see and not the movie he saw...
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:44 PM
Jan 2015

Godard said: "In order to criticize a movie, you have to make another movie."

Can't wait Peter Maass's interpretation of the Iraq war

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"How Clint Eastwood ...