General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"How Clint Eastwood Ignores History in ‘American Sniper'"
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/01/08/clint-eastwood-ignores-history-american-sniper/"The problem is that the film makes no attempt to tell us anything beyond Kyles limited comprehension of what was happening. More than a decade after America invaded and occupied Iraq, and long after we realized the wars false pretense and its horrific toll, we deserve better. Theres a dilemma at work: a war movie that is true of one Americans experience can be utterly false to the experience of millions of Iraqis and to the historical record. Further, its no act of patriotism to celebrate, without context or discussion, a grunts view that the people killed in Iraq were animals deserving their six-feet-under fate. When the movies villain, an enemy sniper named Mustafa, was killed by Kyle, the crowd at the theater where I was watching broke into applause.
If Cooper, the films star, means what he said about its lack of politics, he fails to understand how war movies operate in popular culture. When a film venerates an American sniper but portrays as sub-human the Iraqis whose country we were occupyingthe film has one Iraqi who seems sympathetic but turns out to be hiding a cache of insurgent weaponsit conveys a political message that is flat wrong. Among other things, it ignores and dishonors the scores of thousands of Iraqis who fought alongside American forces and the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who were killed or injured in the crossfire."
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)movies do that
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Ahem:
uhnope
(6,419 posts)See http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6106493
Have you seen it?
Pholus
(4,062 posts)It was a binary choice: make an accurate account, or sell tickets by playing to stereotypes.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Heidi
(58,237 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I cannot believe how many people are losing their shit over a movie.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)such as "Catch Me if You Can" he escapes out of the airplane bathroom but in the movie he did all that to look outside his mom's window during Christmas where he was easily apprehended when in reality he was hiding in Canada. I also thought the movie should have included his escape from prison where he posed as an undercover prison inspector (which made sense at the time as the prison was hit by undercover prison inspectors shortly before).
Also the many Grisham movies are so far the book loses my mind such as The Firm. Over-billing are you so serious?
I think the true story or book version is always far more interesting than the movie changes which bugs me. Also a lot people put a certain value on movies that are a "true story" but "true story" in American Cinema means something very different to me than most people. With a movie that deals with subjects such as Iraq war in the context with the current conflicts in the very same country the stakes are higher so I have no problem with people in bringing awareness or redirecting to more honest flicks such as Generation Kill.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I mean, how true to the actual history of the Force were they? Not very, if you ask me.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I actually couldn't ever watch it all the way through without getting bored but I think you get my point or you somehow completely missed it.
Fiction could bother me, for example there was anti-communist propaganda in films for years, even subtle kinds like in Rocky IV which made it easier for the public support to replace regime changes in Southern America and also made it easier to hate Chavez because he wouldn't play ball with Venezuelan oil or justify the failed regime change.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Rocky was cited as an example, anti-communist propaganda in American cinema had no change in influencing public opinion in regime changes in Southern American (many of which took place under Reagan and even outside including arming, training, & financing Al-Qaeda to fight the USSR in Afghanistan)?
You missed or either deliberately missed my point again.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Now we are making another argument instead of arguing the power of propaganda which you seem to be vastly underestimating. Either way, you still aren't discussing why it has no merit.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Sorry if it stuns you, but I don't think this movie affects a damn thing, and I am skeptical that any of those movies had any of the effects you claimed.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)You could certainly make the argument they felt that way before the movie but it was likely propaganda that caused them to feel that way in the first way but these are people claiming what effects the movie had on them and they aren't positive. I'm sure it would be easier to justify a ground war in Southwest Asia & gain support from those people (as well as others, especially from those who don't have the slightest clue what is really going on & what war was really like & what the Department of Defense did over there)
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Sorry, unmoved. Movies affect people in sundry ways, and always have. The difference now is that anyone can go on social media and blather about it.
Did you know that Titanic caused a surge in people taking cruises?
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Take Birth of a Nation, it was a success at-the-time & also credited with the rebirth of the KKK. It was also was known for several innovations & advancements in American cinema and one of the ways is how they told the story. However if I watched the movie I'd likely get pissed off, another it would confirm prejudices, another it would sway in a negative way though the movie is so old it wouldn't have nearly the same effect like a lot of other old movies did at-the-time.
7962
(11,841 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)If he felt my claim had no merit why was he making illogical arguments? I got the answer to that so no need to clarify things for me further.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)You could easily answer the first question by performing a search & you're still constructing illogical fallacies to the second one.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)When "Return of the Sith" came out the Right Wing was screaming about how George Lucas was portraying the rise of the Empire using a falsified war and promises of security with the Bush Administration and Iraq. Lucas corrected the record by saying it wasn't Dubya at all. The parallel he was using was the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.
After that the silence from the Right was deafening.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I could easily see how they made that mistake though.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)That's a very large part of why we have folk tales, and why we change them over the decades since they were first told.
volstork
(5,400 posts)This is just more fuel to whip up hatred towards others
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Except it didn't.
edhopper
(33,573 posts)to shape public perception?
Or were you not around for the whole "24" / torture debate?
Would it not upset you if this movie lead the majority in this country to think going into Iraq was a good thing?
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)No one will see this move and have their minds changed about Iraq, one way or the other.
Oh, wait. There was that second Civil War that broke out after Gone With the Wind came out.
7962
(11,841 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Dreamer. Dude.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's a similar sort of thing you're doing, really, isn't it?
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)right and even a duty to resist by armed struggle our illegal occupation.
End of story.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)becoming an adult. But had Iraq invaded us on charges that we had WMDS -- which we arguably do in the form of our nuclear arsenals -- without first getting approval from the U.N. Security Council, I would have joined the resistance to Iraq's illegal invasion and occupation.
Where it gets morally tough and complicated is that Americans who knew the score had a responsibility to support the Iraqi resistance to their own government's illegal invasion and occupation, even if supporting the Iraqi resistance meant opposing their own military. I resolutely refused to say "I support our troops" because that was just code for saying "I support an illegal invasion and occupation."
If there's ever any justice in my life, I would hope to see Bush, Cheney and the architects of that war brought up on war crimes charges before some competent international authority. I'm not holding my breath.
on point
(2,506 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I like the honesty portrayed in Flags of our Fathers & heard great things about Letters from Iwo Jima which the settings of the two movies are from the same battle, but told from different perspectives such with the Japanese soldier in Letters from Iwo Jima.
on point
(2,506 posts)Even though I think US side has no redeeming qualities. Good soldiers doing as they were told by their corrupt greedy political war criminals. That's the tragedy that needs to be told.
Paladin
(28,252 posts)There's no use pretending that Eastwood doesn't have a genuine gift for film directing. That said, I don't intend on seeing the sniper movie.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)that of the Vietnamese who had massive support from the USSR and People's Republic of China. The Iraqi resistance had to do it on their own.
7962
(11,841 posts)They're living the dream now, arent they?
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)secure any strategic gains and, arguably, strengthened Iran.
Please tell me how the U.S. was not defeated. (See also Vietnam.)
RoccoRyg
(260 posts)That movie is one big sci-fi parody of propaganda war films. It shows you everything to look for, such as lost loves, heroic sacrifices, ultra-nationalist television, weakling wartime opposition, etc.
It's funny how the original author, Robert Heinlein, was an ultra-right winger who really thought that kind of society was the right way to go. The movie mocks and pays homage to his vision perfectly.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Since the book is the opposite of what you claim.
It's a little like claiming Orwell loved surveillance states because of 1984.
REP
(21,691 posts)The movie is satire - fierce in parts and campy in others - but at the same time, it does manage to pay homage of sorts to the dead-serious source material. Its ultimate conclusion and message is 180 degrees from Heinlein's (one reason why the movie works), but through many watchings, it's always struck me as the work of someone who loved the book as a kid, then grew up and really understood and disagreed with the message.
Paladin
(28,252 posts)It created some controversy when it came out, due to the Nazi overtones of the military. Neil Patrick Harris looks striking in his black SS-styled uniform.....
glasshouses
(484 posts)your limited comprehension on why you are there.
Politics just seem to go out the window....know what I mean
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)glasshouses
(484 posts)And still to this day
arcane1
(38,613 posts)We were greeted as the invaders that we were.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)He made a piss poor choice of a character to use as his symbol. It's hard to humanize somebody who lies about shooting two guys at a gas station, about picking off dozens of American citizens from the top of the super dome, and who libels a fellow Seal to the extent that it costs his estate several million dollars.
A fake hero for a fake war. Sad that this is the best they could do.
but most won't go beyond the movie and think this guy is a hero.
PatSeg
(47,405 posts)for a long time now (before the republican convention). I hate the fact that if he puts his name on anything, it is automatically considered an Oscar contender. Though he has made some excellent films, his ego tends to get in the way far too often and he frequently gets far more credit than he has earned.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)If I give a damn about him at all.
Nope. Thought so. Let him rot and his terrible movie with him..
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)They just make shit up and play it as truth.
Problem is, we have masses of mindless, STOOPID lemmings that can't begin to think for themselves and believe it.
Response to Dawson Leery (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
sailfla
(239 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)When a film venerates an American sniper but portrays as sub-human the Iraqis whose country we were occupying...it conveys a political message that is flat wrong."
= indeed.
and everyone knows it's true. The only way to get around that inconvenient truth is by lying and fictionalizing and using music and other tools for propagandistic purposes.
Eastwood's made a propaganda film for the US military. A clever one, but it's propaganda.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)I haven't seen it, won't see it, not even a little bit interested in it.
I served 28 years in the Army -- 1967 - 1995, including two tours in Vietnam, both in the bush. There's nothing glorious about war, sniping, bobby traps, ambushes, body bags, missing arms and legs, chests peeled open, tops of heads blown away, 19-yr-old kids crying for their mother with their last breath.
Clint was never there, that's why he celebrates it.
"War is at best barbarism. . . . Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell."
William T. Sherman
"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it."
Robert E. Lee
VWolf
(3,944 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)watching Union troops be mowed down as they advanced uphill against fortified and prepared Confederate positions. Longstreet had some choice words to say about Lee after Appomattox and I refuse to venerate Lee any longer.
Have you ever read James Jones' From Here to Eternity (or seen the film version with Burt Lancaster and Montgomery Clift)? If you have not, I strongly recommend either or both. (Deborah Kerr and Donna Reed are also not hard on the eyes
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)It's a biographical film about an individual. It's not intended to be anything else, and if some viewers read broader political elements into it that happen to be historically inaccurate, then that fault likes with an insufficiently-informed viewer, not the film. They shouldn't be looking to entertainment-oriented movies for broad and balanced historical information. That's what actual historical sources are for.
For a film with a narrow perspective, as any film focused on a single individual's experience will inevitably be, to attempt to provide a remotely adequate historical overview would require a massive amount of screen time be devoted to such exposition. That would, obviously, completely destroy the film in terms of it being an effective story.
Does the film present a seriously skewed perspective on Iraqis, painting them as subhuman savages? Apparently it does. But the film's story is also told from the perspective of someone who believed exactly that, if his statements are accurate reflections of his views.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Letter from Iwo Jima was a great war film.
I doubt I'll see American Sniper, but a good film doesn't have to be a lecture on politics, war, or focused on how the masses will react.
Man, never thought I'd be reduced to defending Eastwood....
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I'm probably going to see this movie, as well as Selma, and The Gambler.
It isn't being billed as a documentary or a history of the Iraq war. It's one guy's story.
edit to add --
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6106899
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)Now I'm sure I'll catch a ton of crap.
I feel really sorry for those who are in constant outrage over every fucking thing. It's a movie. See it and enjoy it or don't.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)The perpetual outrage gets old.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)There's a time to get outraged, and this ain't one of them.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)a blatant propaganda film from a republican douchebag, depicting a nutbar sniper killing everything in sight in a country that didn't attack us?
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)about Iraq.
Read this --
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6106899
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Are you saying I am like those tweeting assholes?
If you are you couldn't be more fucking wrong. Sorry, I am not expressing the "appropriate" outrage.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I will be a fan or not after I see it. I prefer to do that, rather then jump on the knee jerk band wagon with others that haven't seen the movie.
Seems people should stick to Disney and stupid cat videos. Those are all the pretty formulaic and there's no need to see them before forming an opinion.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)1) Clint seemingly can make only ONE kind of war movie -- the tried-and-true formula requires a "reluctant hero." The opening kill scene with the mother and child is meant to display the moral ambiguity that would be the basis of Kyle's PTSD but in the book, Chris Kyle never describes as much as a twinge of ambiguity. His lack of self-reflection is a large part of the reason he could be effective in his role. As a soldier in a war zone, an accidental kill of an innocent is a better result than losing a friend because you didn't shoot. But that makes for an unsympathetic character, so selling tickets requires a small change to the story.
2) Kyle's post-military exploits seem to involve him getting caught in lie after lie, most notably about supposedly dead carjackers, punching out Jesse Ventura and Katrina looters. I blame the violence and military worshiping subculture that rises up around guns for that. Kyle came back from Iraq a legend for good reason, but here he was just a regular guy unless he cashed in. Just play to the subculture and get a constant paycheck as long as he could keep getting his name mentioned. Yes, I am insinuating that functionally he was basically a Kardashian -- controversy ensures cash. The movie could not get into that of course, because the formula demands that "reluctant heroes" eventually find a peace. "Craft International" just isn't the kind of business a "reluctant hero" would create.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)or has a twinge of ambiguity are usually sociopaths which I feel Kyle is based on the many lies, "n--" which he used to describe the looters, "savages", as well as the no self-reflection, etc.
I agree they certainly would make excellent snipers as well as lawyers & salesman due to their indifference to morality but since it isn't a sociopaths fault they're sociopaths so I can't blame him for that either, I think he is just who is though the violence & subculture can be blamed on sociopaths and/or apathy.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)which itself was written from the POV of Kyle.
He wasn't makeing a documentary.
And we are talking about a guy who speaks to chairs.
DesertDawg
(66 posts)American Liar, Tales from America's Biggest Bullshitter. Normally I respect the troops, but this clown was a typical Redneck loudmouth caught telling bullshit stories(Knocking out Jesse Ventura in California that never happened), going off of that whopper and the fact that actual Sniper badasses never brag about what they do(they have no need), and going after the fact this clown self pegged himself "the World's Deadliest Sniper" it's safe to say he was full of shit and overcompensating. Fuck him and fuck this bullshit movie.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but I like mine more nuanced, like "Lone Survivor."
7962
(11,841 posts)No movie ever gets it all right. Even with Selma, many have criticized how LBJ was portrayed as being ambivalent about the civil rights movement, when records show he was supportive of it early on. Thats just the way it goes with the movies.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)Ellipsis
(9,124 posts)Ya got a problem? ...bitch at the writer.
After losing Steven Spielberg as director, Warners Bros. has acted quickly to find a director for American Sniper with Clint Eastwood in talks to helm the biopic starring Bradley Cooper.
Jason Hall penned the script for Sniper about a Navy SEAL recounting his military career that included more than 150 confirmed kills. Film is based on the book American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History by Chris Kyle, Scott McEwan and Jim DeFelice.
Coopers production company 22nd & Indiana Pictures and Andrew Lazars Mad Chance Productions optioned rights to the book a year ago.
Eastwood is in production on the adaptation of Jersey Boys and would jump to American Sniper once the musical finishes filming.
http://variety.com/2013/film/news/clint-eastwood-american-sniper-warners-1200585301/
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)We have to celebrate the heroism! No matter how fucking twisted it is. You know, if we are to maintain this military culture (mentality) so we will be prepared for future war already being planned (2017).
If I'm not mistaken Eastwood made a movie about Grenada. FUCKING GRENADA! [URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Don't we think the CIA/American taxpayers funded the entire thing? Come on!
valerief
(53,235 posts)Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)But the way this movie is doing at the box office and the way fans are reacting to it (A+ Cinemascore, raving to others), it feels like we're back in 2003. My friend is a teacher. She was telling her students and peers about "Selma" yesterday (MLK Jr Day) at school. Every time she brought it up, someone (student, peer) would bring up "Sniper" and they'd all start talking about that. It feels a lot like the "hoo rah" days up to/at the beginning of the Iraq invasion.
lame54
(35,285 posts)Godard said: "In order to criticize a movie, you have to make another movie."
Can't wait Peter Maass's interpretation of the Iraq war
lame54
(35,285 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)You can't expect much.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)He and Cooper (star of the "Luminary Masterwork" "The Hangover" are a perfect couple.