General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToll Of 5 Years Of Drone Strikes: 2,400 Dead .The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama
The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama reached its fifth anniversary on Thursday having tallied up an estimated death toll of at least 2,400 people.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued a pair of reports in October fiercely criticizing the secrecy that shrouds the administration's drone program, and calling for investigations into the deaths of drone victims with no apparent connection to terrorism. In Pakistan alone, TBIJ estimates, between 416 and 951 civilians, including 168 to 200 children, have been killed.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-drone-program-anniversary_n_4654825.html
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)That is scary. He is getting closer to Bush numbers. He was at 4800 deaths total (less than a thousand for Afghanistan and about 2600 for Iraq).
glasshouses
(484 posts)How many Iraqis died in the 8 years Bush was in?
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)glasshouses
(484 posts)It keeps our guys safe but even one child killed because he or she was in the wrong place is one too many.
Skittles
(157,439 posts)glasshouses
(484 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... Is to do nothing at all. That is, of course, a position one can take, but I think it's a bit of a Polly Anna position. The real world is very messy.
glasshouses
(484 posts)I remember how upset I felt when just 2 or 3 years ago the estimate of innocent children killed
by drones was 28
Now it's 200
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Imagine how much the death toll of innocents has risen since then.
wavesofeuphoria
(525 posts)Oklahoma_Liberal
(69 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)remote control murder. Maybe an individual sitting in Florida, waiting for his lunch break. Then he/she will go home to his family with nary a hair out of place. It's disgusting.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I can't understand your point of view. Would you be happier if occasionally one of our pilots were killed?
elias49
(4,259 posts)It makes life cheap when you can eliminate your adversary with a joy stick 5,000 miles from the 'battlefield'.
You don't see that?
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)A pilot dropping a bomb from 25,000 ft, and UAV operator doing it remotely. Neither will see the target as anything more than a target on a screen.
And no, war is not about putting people at risk. It's a nasty, brutal thing. And when it must be executed, it should be executed in the most lopsided, unfair manner possible. Hit when they ain't looking and don't give them a chance to strike back.
elias49
(4,259 posts)Ugh. Can't agree.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I'd say "video games" are more like the real thing, rather than the other way around. But yeah, technology is here to stay. That technology has also helped us advance precision delivery of weapons to greatly reduce civilian casualties as compared to, say, WWII.
elias49
(4,259 posts)This isn't our planet. As another op points out, we've deployed 'black ops' to 105 countries around the world. Those that don't play our game - won't buy our capitalist system, and our goods - get the poop end of the stick. Or destabilized (Ukraine).
One of the reasons the Vietnam war ended when it did is because the American public SAW what war was about. It's about dismemberment, burned bodies (phosphorous) and children without parents. IMO, you can't get precise enough. Never will.
War is the last vestige of megalomaniacs. Maybe if people could see what the landscape looked like after a major battle during the Civil War they'd say "Enough".
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)With a slick, morally bankrupt propaganda machine to sell it all.
I weep for what my country has become.
KG
(28,764 posts)the propaganda machine's been selling it since the 1800's
PatrickforO
(15,008 posts)I have a friend who makes the point that every president since Truman is guilty of some war crime, except Carter. No shots were ever fired in anger during his administration. And, after leaving office, he has become a great man.
We have to face it, the military crazies are pretty much running the show.
benz380
(534 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)In comparison, even the 9th and 10th most devastating bombing attacks of WW2 had five times as many civilian deaths during one attack and the efficacy in terms of the war effort was even more in question than it is for drone attacks.
http://www.onlinemilitaryeducation.org/posts/10-most-devastating-bombing-campaigns-of-wwii/
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)killed in three countries over five years is miniscule. Its not "dumb luck"
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)glasshouses
(484 posts)Your logic is stunning
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I know that rains on your narrative, but the strikes are not occurring all over Pakistan, but in a very narrow zone controlled by the Taliban.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid