General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy the modern world is bad for your brain
Why the modern world is bad for your brain
In an era of email, text messages, Facebook and Twitter, were all required to do several things at once. But this constant multitasking is taking its toll. Here neuroscientist Daniel J Levitin explains how our addiction to technology is making us less efficient
(Guardian UK) Our brains are busier than ever before. Were assaulted with facts, pseudo facts, jibber-jabber, and rumour, all posing as information. Trying to figure out what you need to know and what you can ignore is exhausting. At the same time, we are all doing more. Thirty years ago, travel agents made our airline and rail reservations, salespeople helped us find what we were looking for in shops, and professional typists or secretaries helped busy people with their correspondence. Now we do most of those things ourselves. We are doing the jobs of 10 different people while still trying to keep up with our lives, our children and parents, our friends, our careers, our hobbies, and our favourite TV shows.
Our smartphones have become Swiss army knifelike appliances that include a dictionary, calculator, web browser, email, Game Boy, appointment calendar, voice recorder, guitar tuner, weather forecaster, GPS, texter, tweeter, Facebook updater, and flashlight. Theyre more powerful and do more things than the most advanced computer at IBM corporate headquarters 30 years ago. And we use them all the time, part of a 21st-century mania for cramming everything we do into every single spare moment of downtime. We text while were walking across the street, catch up on email while standing in a queue and while having lunch with friends, we surreptitiously check to see what our other friends are doing. At the kitchen counter, cosy and secure in our domicile, we write our shopping lists on smartphones while we are listening to that wonderfully informative podcast on urban beekeeping.
But theres a fly in the ointment. Although we think were doing several things at once, multitasking, this is a powerful and diabolical illusion. Earl Miller, a neuroscientist at MIT and one of the world experts on divided attention, says that our brains are not wired to multitask well When people think theyre multitasking, theyre actually just switching from one task to another very rapidly. And every time they do, theres a cognitive cost in doing so. So were not actually keeping a lot of balls in the air like an expert juggler; were more like a bad amateur plate spinner, frantically switching from one task to another, ignoring the one that is not right in front of us but worried it will come crashing down any minute. Even though we think were getting a lot done, ironically, multitasking makes us demonstrably less efficient.
Multitasking has been found to increase the production of the stress hormone cortisol as well as the fight-or-flight hormone adrenaline, which can overstimulate your brain and cause mental fog or scrambled thinking. Multitasking creates a dopamine-addiction feedback loop, effectively rewarding the brain for losing focus and for constantly searching for external stimulation. To make matters worse, the prefrontal cortex has a novelty bias, meaning that its attention can be easily hijacked by something new the proverbial shiny objects we use to entice infants, puppies, and kittens. The irony here for those of us who are trying to focus amid competing activities is clear: the very brain region we need to rely on for staying on task is easily distracted. We answer the phone, look up something on the internet, check our email, send an SMS, and each of these things tweaks the novelty- seeking, reward-seeking centres of the brain, causing a burst of endogenous opioids (no wonder it feels so good!), all to the detriment of our staying on task. It is the ultimate empty-caloried brain candy. Instead of reaping the big rewards that come from sustained, focused effort, we instead reap empty rewards from completing a thousand little sugar-coated tasks. ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan/18/modern-world-bad-for-brain-daniel-j-levitin-organized-mind-information-overload?CMP=fb_us
enough
(13,256 posts)marmar
(77,067 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)That despite growing up entirely in the modern age, with cell phones, handheld devices, the internet, etc., my parents elected to keep the vast majority of that from me.
I read books as a child instead of playing video games. I played with legos and ran outside instead of watching tv. I didn't get a cell phone until I scared the crap out of my mom after not coming home because of a late bus after school (that sounds atupid, but it was late. Idiot bus driver didn't know the area and decided to take directions from 30+ 12 and 13 year olds. We were...late, to say the least.). Even then, I didn't get texting until halfway through junior year of high school.
I firmly believe all the choices they made are the reasons I am not consumed and addicted to the constant stream of social information like so many in my age group are. It's actually rather disconcerting--it can be hard to find people I relate to, actually. Trying to keep in contact with people without resorting to social media is very challenging. Since I refuse to give in, I have the feeling there are a few friends I have drifted away from and lost.
I also notice it in that very, very few people read anymore. The idea of sitting through an entire book ( ) is alien to many. I really wonder how much this makes educating our youth just that much more difficult for our teachers. There are so many things we use automatically these days without a second thought. It is good to see research like this being done.
As I write this on my phone, I'm trying not to laugh at the irony that I am on DU all the time. Bit off a difference in that I spend most of the time reading longer articles, though.
Excellent article.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Sorry, just preempting the Smug Patrol.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)What's so smug about that? I just don't happen to want one.