Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:01 AM Jan 2015

We cannot allow this from the Right: "Sarah Palin Slips into Self-Parody"

Palin has always been into "Self-Parody". This didn't just occur recently. The Right owns her. She was their choice for VP. They have revered her for 8 years. We can't stay quiet while they try to throw her under the clown bus now. She has been their creation, their means of revenue. (Even though that revenue is somewhat meager minus Sarah's expenses.)

Sarah...she must not be forsaken She needs to stay in the spotlight, and we need to help her do just that.

"...In the Washington Examiner, Byron York treated those who missed the address to a brutal dissection. First, he recorded, Palin subjected the crowd to an “extended stream-of-consciousness complaint about media coverage of her decision to run in a half-marathon race in Storm Lake, Iowa.” Next, she offered up some self-righteous “grumbling about coverage of a recent photo of her with a supporter” and a litany of “objections about the social media ruckus over a picture of her six-year-old son Trig.” And, finally, she embarked upon a “free-association ramble on Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the energy industry, her daughter Bristol, Margaret Thatcher, middle-class economics . . . women in politics, and much more.” All in all, York proposed, this did her no favors at all. Rather, the “long, rambling, and at times barely coherent speech, left some wondering what role she should play in Republican politics as the 2016 race begins.

This, I think, is a good question, and one to which I have a modest answer: How about . . . none? Instead, Palin should leave the field to those who are in possession of genuine political aspirations, and she should refrain from treating the Republican party as if it were a little more than a convenient vehicle for her private ambition. In the meantime, conservatives who are finally cottoning on to the ruse should recognize that this Iowa sojourn was not an aberration or a blip, but the foreordained culmination of a slow and unseemly descent into farce that began almost immediately after Barack Obama was elected in 2008. So Sarah Palin has become Amy Winehouse? Of course she has. How else exactly was this going to end?

“It would be hard to say,” York observed drily, “that Palin’s 35-minute talk had a theme.” But, one might ask, “Do they ever?” For a long while now, Palin has not so much contributed arguments and ideas as she has thrown together a one-woman variety show for a band of traveling fans. One part free verse, one part Dada-laden ressentiment, and one part primal scream therapy, Palin’s appearances seem to be designed less to advance the ball for the Right and more to ensure that her name remains in the news, that her business opportunities are not entirely foreclosed, and that her hand remains strong enough to justify her role as kingmaker without portfolio. Ultimately, she isn’t really trying to change politics; she’s trying to be politics — the system and its complexities be damned. Want to find a figure to which Palin can be reasonably compared? It’s not Ronald Reagan. It’s Donald Trump.

<snip>

It is deeply unconservative, too. The Right will likely never agree on how best it should move forward, but we might at least unite against the belief that there exist superheroes who are able to save the country from itself; against the idea that any one person can be the official standard bearer of a whole ideological or demographic group; and against the presumption that conservatism will gain anything much at all from the promotion and advancement of its most erratic champions. Further still, we might refrain from attempting to immunize our friends from the consequences of their actions. Having been mercilessly and unjustly pilloried by the media throughout the 2008 campaign, Sarah Palin had a clear choice in its aftermath: She could sober up and prove the buggers wrong, or she could collapse into ignominious pasquinade. Sadly, she chose the latter. The rest of us should choose to move on.

The rest: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397238/sarah-palin-slips-self-parody-charles-c-w-cooke

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
3. her 15 minutes is up. why waste space on her. she was never supposed to win in the first place
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:38 AM
Jan 2015

& neither was McCain. sideshow. obvious.

Cha

(296,878 posts)
4. This seems photoshopped with Michael Moore but it's still pertinent!
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:50 AM
Jan 2015


http://theobamadiary.com/2015/01/26/a-tweet-or-two-219/

Thanks for your OP, Contrary.. I don't think palin should be swept under the rug.. her antics need to be exposed so maybe just maybe the whole country will wake up and say bye.. you've milked your griftees enough.

malaise

(268,724 posts)
5. What did he have to say about her back in 2008?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 06:44 AM
Jan 2015

Yep they created this monster - and they must never be allowed to forget it.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
6. Exactly...he claims that she was "unjustly pilloried by the media" in 2008
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 07:45 AM
Jan 2015

When in fact, it was simply the case that even our easily bamboozled, celebrity-addled news media saw through her way back then, as he's only managing to now.

hatrack

(59,578 posts)
8. What a bunch of BULLSHIT! We knew she was a joke six years ago - why didn't they?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 09:10 AM
Jan 2015

She's always been a self-parody.

Her only purpose now (other than enriching herself) is to serve as a mobile clown show, to be rolled out into the deep hustings whenever Mr. & Mrs. Ducttape of Mosquito Bite, KS need to be convinced that "You should vote for (GOP Candidate), 'cuz he's the only one with the courage to cut your Medicare benefits, because FREEDOM!"

"Starbursts", indeed, you lying assclowns.

rock

(13,218 posts)
9. The Right doesn't know what self-parody is
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jan 2015

They don't do humor. But, they take their cue from us, and figure they better ride along, clueless.

central scrutinizer

(11,637 posts)
10. self-parody implies self-awareness
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 11:49 AM
Jan 2015

She is not smart enough to know that she is ridiculous. Self-parody also implies critical thinking - two words that would never be associated with the Klondike Kardashian. Willful ignorance and racism are virtues in the Republican party.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
11. The Right doesn't own her.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 11:58 AM
Jan 2015

She's a grifter who owns a piece of the rubes the Right still needs. If she were owned, she'd have had a teleprompter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We cannot allow this from...