General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe cannot allow this from the Right: "Sarah Palin Slips into Self-Parody"
Palin has always been into "Self-Parody". This didn't just occur recently. The Right owns her. She was their choice for VP. They have revered her for 8 years. We can't stay quiet while they try to throw her under the clown bus now. She has been their creation, their means of revenue. (Even though that revenue is somewhat meager minus Sarah's expenses.)
Sarah...she must not be forsaken She needs to stay in the spotlight, and we need to help her do just that.
"...In the Washington Examiner, Byron York treated those who missed the address to a brutal dissection. First, he recorded, Palin subjected the crowd to an extended stream-of-consciousness complaint about media coverage of her decision to run in a half-marathon race in Storm Lake, Iowa. Next, she offered up some self-righteous grumbling about coverage of a recent photo of her with a supporter and a litany of objections about the social media ruckus over a picture of her six-year-old son Trig. And, finally, she embarked upon a free-association ramble on Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the energy industry, her daughter Bristol, Margaret Thatcher, middle-class economics . . . women in politics, and much more. All in all, York proposed, this did her no favors at all. Rather, the long, rambling, and at times barely coherent speech, left some wondering what role she should play in Republican politics as the 2016 race begins.
This, I think, is a good question, and one to which I have a modest answer: How about . . . none? Instead, Palin should leave the field to those who are in possession of genuine political aspirations, and she should refrain from treating the Republican party as if it were a little more than a convenient vehicle for her private ambition. In the meantime, conservatives who are finally cottoning on to the ruse should recognize that this Iowa sojourn was not an aberration or a blip, but the foreordained culmination of a slow and unseemly descent into farce that began almost immediately after Barack Obama was elected in 2008. So Sarah Palin has become Amy Winehouse? Of course she has. How else exactly was this going to end?
It would be hard to say, York observed drily, that Palins 35-minute talk had a theme. But, one might ask, Do they ever? For a long while now, Palin has not so much contributed arguments and ideas as she has thrown together a one-woman variety show for a band of traveling fans. One part free verse, one part Dada-laden ressentiment, and one part primal scream therapy, Palins appearances seem to be designed less to advance the ball for the Right and more to ensure that her name remains in the news, that her business opportunities are not entirely foreclosed, and that her hand remains strong enough to justify her role as kingmaker without portfolio. Ultimately, she isnt really trying to change politics; shes trying to be politics the system and its complexities be damned. Want to find a figure to which Palin can be reasonably compared? Its not Ronald Reagan. Its Donald Trump.
<snip>
It is deeply unconservative, too. The Right will likely never agree on how best it should move forward, but we might at least unite against the belief that there exist superheroes who are able to save the country from itself; against the idea that any one person can be the official standard bearer of a whole ideological or demographic group; and against the presumption that conservatism will gain anything much at all from the promotion and advancement of its most erratic champions. Further still, we might refrain from attempting to immunize our friends from the consequences of their actions. Having been mercilessly and unjustly pilloried by the media throughout the 2008 campaign, Sarah Palin had a clear choice in its aftermath: She could sober up and prove the buggers wrong, or she could collapse into ignominious pasquinade. Sadly, she chose the latter. The rest of us should choose to move on.
The rest: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397238/sarah-palin-slips-self-parody-charles-c-w-cooke
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,955 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)& neither was McCain. sideshow. obvious.
Cha
(296,878 posts)http://theobamadiary.com/2015/01/26/a-tweet-or-two-219/
Thanks for your OP, Contrary.. I don't think palin should be swept under the rug.. her antics need to be exposed so maybe just maybe the whole country will wake up and say bye.. you've milked your griftees enough.
malaise
(268,724 posts)Yep they created this monster - and they must never be allowed to forget it.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)When in fact, it was simply the case that even our easily bamboozled, celebrity-addled news media saw through her way back then, as he's only managing to now.
malaise
(268,724 posts)They are all lying hypocrites - they own her.
hatrack
(59,578 posts)She's always been a self-parody.
Her only purpose now (other than enriching herself) is to serve as a mobile clown show, to be rolled out into the deep hustings whenever Mr. & Mrs. Ducttape of Mosquito Bite, KS need to be convinced that "You should vote for (GOP Candidate), 'cuz he's the only one with the courage to cut your Medicare benefits, because FREEDOM!"
"Starbursts", indeed, you lying assclowns.
rock
(13,218 posts)They don't do humor. But, they take their cue from us, and figure they better ride along, clueless.
central scrutinizer
(11,637 posts)She is not smart enough to know that she is ridiculous. Self-parody also implies critical thinking - two words that would never be associated with the Klondike Kardashian. Willful ignorance and racism are virtues in the Republican party.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)She's a grifter who owns a piece of the rubes the Right still needs. If she were owned, she'd have had a teleprompter.