Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 12:25 PM Jan 2015

BREAKING (NBC): Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will be charged with desertion for abandoning post in 2009

Jonathan Capehart retweeted
NBC Nightly News ?@NBCNightlyNews 57m57 minutes ago

BREAKING: Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will be charged with desertion for abandoning his post in 2009, senior defense officials tell NBC News

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING (NBC): Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will be charged with desertion for abandoning post in 2009 (Original Post) bigtree Jan 2015 OP
As I've said in the LBN thread, I have faith that he will be treated TwilightGardener Jan 2015 #1
I think the WH 'influence' that counts was Pres. Obama's intervention getting the soldier back home bigtree Jan 2015 #3
There's no question he had to be brought home. You don't leave your TwilightGardener Jan 2015 #4
If you can use PTS after going off and killing innocent people, surely that's a defense for him. nt kelliekat44 Jan 2015 #48
Army denying they reached verdict JaneyVee Jan 2015 #2
Not ready to officially announce it yet, is my guess. TwilightGardener Jan 2015 #20
We traded five terrorist prisoners from Gitmo for that guy. Octafish Jan 2015 #5
Are you being sarcastic? tammywammy Jan 2015 #6
What do you think? Octafish Jan 2015 #17
I didn't start any threads on it. cwydro Jan 2015 #21
I don't know why you focus so much on journals. tammywammy Jan 2015 #24
I AM JOURNAL MAN! snooper2 Jan 2015 #32
We traded five people that were never charged with any crime, not even terrorism. Bandit Jan 2015 #7
we traded five prisoners who hadn't been charged or tried with anything bigtree Jan 2015 #8
Not even the Geneva Accords applied to such vermin. Octafish Jan 2015 #25
these prisoners were captured on the battlefield bigtree Jan 2015 #34
Absolutely True. Octafish Jan 2015 #36
Strange then that everyone seems to know. Codeine Jan 2015 #9
That's why I asked of he was being sarcastic. tammywammy Jan 2015 #11
Yeah, I even heard it on my local cwydro Jan 2015 #22
I am stealing that amazing portmanteau. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #12
The BFEE kept it hidden... SidDithers Jan 2015 #13
The war? Not so much. Their responsibility, certainly. Octafish Jan 2015 #28
What conspiracy is that, Codeine? Octafish Jan 2015 #15
google bigtree-Bergdahl bigtree Jan 2015 #18
... cwydro Jan 2015 #30
when I google octafish + bfee I get over 27,200 results- YOU ARE PART snooper2 Jan 2015 #35
I post on DU about the BFEE and crimes of the national security state. Octafish Jan 2015 #37
There is a bunch of odd things about this case. nilesobek Jan 2015 #50
I have no idea why you are criticized for pointing this out JonLP24 Jan 2015 #52
some people in denial cant handle the implicit guilt of being part of the coverup reddread Jan 2015 #56
Exactly what the heck does that mean? nt Codeine Jan 2015 #44
For what it's worth, Octy's facts are worth far more than your snark Cleita Jan 2015 #53
I think he's nuts, and I see no facts in evidence. Codeine Jan 2015 #55
If you knew what I know, you might be nuts, too. Octafish Jan 2015 #58
After we finish with Bergdahl, can we go after Bush/Cheney? Karmadillo Jan 2015 #10
I'd settle for Petraeus, since leaking official secrets got Kiriakou and Sperling KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #14
Or maybe at least the collateral murder guys? Karmadillo Jan 2015 #16
What would we charge them with? What Assange and Manning reported turned out to not be true stevenleser Jan 2015 #19
This? Karmadillo Jan 2015 #23
Correct. As politifact points out, that is not what happened. nt stevenleser Jan 2015 #38
Incorrect. Politifact does not address the war crime issues raised in Karmadillo Jan 2015 #41
Yes, they do and very simply. The group fired on was armed with RPGs and other heavy weapons. stevenleser Jan 2015 #42
Wow. Octafish Jan 2015 #27
You can read the politifact report for yourself and Assange acknowledged all of its points as true. stevenleser Jan 2015 #39
First Amendment Octafish Jan 2015 #45
No, now you are changing the subject. Which is an admission of sorts all by itself. Nt stevenleser Jan 2015 #46
You indicated Assange and Manning were proven wrong. How so? Octafish Jan 2015 #47
Assange admitted it. I provided the link to politifact upthread stevenleser Jan 2015 #49
I'm glad they seem to be moving towards trying him in court. bluedigger Jan 2015 #26
Sorry, but I don't have ANY faith in a military court. . . DinahMoeHum Jan 2015 #29
You just can't handle the truth. bluedigger Jan 2015 #31
NBC's correspondent reported on one outcome considered likely: pinboy3niner Jan 2015 #33
That's my guess too. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #57
I believe that he gladium et scutum Jan 2015 #43
UPDATE: Army says no actions, decision in Bergdahl investigation herding cats Jan 2015 #40
Lacks context JonLP24 Jan 2015 #51
Because he was already in the news due to his capture and release. Angleae Jan 2015 #54

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. As I've said in the LBN thread, I have faith that he will be treated
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 12:51 PM
Jan 2015

fairly and with consideration of all the relevant factors and circumstances. What is a little troubling is that Pentagon sources are leaking to Fox News that Little Benny Rhodes, Fiction Writer Extraordinaire, was exerting WH influence on the case. I would hope the WH wouldn't be that stupid as to interfere with the Army's handling of the situation.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
3. I think the WH 'influence' that counts was Pres. Obama's intervention getting the soldier back home
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 12:59 PM
Jan 2015

. . . in the first place.

This is almost certainly an entirely military-driven decision to prosecute, imo. I could stand some WH 'interference' asking for leniency based on Sgt. Berghdal's ordeal of imprisonment.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. There's no question he had to be brought home. You don't leave your
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:04 PM
Jan 2015

soldier as a captive in the hands of the enemy, period--especially since Bergdahl was pretty clearly mentally or emotionally troubled. But no, the White House should not interfere with the investigation or judicial process once he's back in the Army's hands. If the WH wants to, it can eventually pardon Bergdahl if he's convicted of anything, that's their right.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
20. Not ready to officially announce it yet, is my guess.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:08 PM
Jan 2015

Honestly, based on what is commonly accepted to be true about Bergdahl's disappearance, they'd almost have to charge him with desertion, especially if he's admitted to leaving--but charges aren't a conviction, it's important to note. Also, there apparently are some legal avenues available to him, as the process moves forward.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. What do you think?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:03 PM
Jan 2015

And, as your Journal is empty, do you have link to an OP you started on DU when it happened, tammywammy?

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
21. I didn't start any threads on it.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:11 PM
Jan 2015

But it was all over the news and on DU.

All the talk shows...Fox went insane over it. But I heard it on pretty much every channel.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
24. I don't know why you focus so much on journals.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:25 PM
Jan 2015

It's not a requirement to use this site, it's an additional feature I choose not to utilize.

I doubt I personally started a thread on Bergdahl, but feel free to use the advanced searb function as conveniently provided by admins. Put tammywammy in author, search main forums, all replies, key word Bergdahl and set the time from 1 May 2014 to today.

You can also just use the search box up top and put in Bergdahl and come up with oodles of threads here about him.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
7. We traded five people that were never charged with any crime, not even terrorism.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:30 PM
Jan 2015

People that were held for a decade, and tortured, without any charges ever being filed..

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
25. Not even the Geneva Accords applied to such vermin.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jan 2015

That is the exact word used by NAZIs, fascists and many others who think certain lives have more value than others. For some reason, that idea, like the refrain of an earworm, keeps popping up in our history.

And for the BFEE angle, a PDF of "The Bush Family Ties to Race and Hygeine" a tract by COAT, the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
34. these prisoners were captured on the battlefield
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jan 2015

...call them vermin or whatever, but German prisoners of war, for example, no matter how despicable their conduct may have been in conflict, were released and returned home when the war ended. We don't need a Geneva Convention to tell us right from wrong. Holding prisoners indefinitely without charges or trial is wrong and a reflection of many of the abuses we, here in the U.S., claim to abhor. As another poster remarked, most of these prisoners were subject to repeated tortures, some of them later determined to be without culpability in any threat against America. We either strive to be better than 'vermin,' or we resign ourselves, through our actions, to be no better than them.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
36. Absolutely True.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 04:25 PM
Jan 2015

And I agree absolutely.



The US Government destroyed Jose Padilla's mind.

Juan Gonzalez: And have you dealt with someone who had been in isolation for such a long period of time before?

Dr. Angela Hegarty: No. This was the first time I ever met anybody who had been isolated for such an extraordinarily long period of time. I mean, the sensory deprivation studies, for example, tell us that without sleep, especially, people will develop psychotic symptoms, hallucinations, panic attacks, depression, suicidality within days. And here we had a man who had been in this situation, utterly dependent on his interrogators, who didn’t treat him all that nicely, for years. And apart from –- the only people I ever met who had such a protracted experience were people who were in detention camps overseas, that would come close, but even then they weren’t subjected to the sensory deprivation. So, yes, he was somewhat of a unique case in that regard. -

http://www.democracynow.org/2007/8/16/exclusive_an_inside_look_at_how

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
9. Strange then that everyone seems to know.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jan 2015

It was all over the news at the time. Another imaginary octaspiracy crumbles to dust.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
11. That's why I asked of he was being sarcastic.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jan 2015

This was all over the news. I don't watch cable news, but I remember my local channel covering it for days and days. And there was a huge uproar from republicans for trading "terrorists" for a "deserter".

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
28. The war? Not so much. Their responsibility, certainly.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jan 2015

Which bothers me when you denigrate me over the years for posting about the BFEE, SidDithers of DU.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. What conspiracy is that, Codeine?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:56 PM
Jan 2015

BTW: When I GOOGLED Codeine + Bowe-Bergdahl on the DU site search engine, nothing came back.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
35. when I google octafish + bfee I get over 27,200 results- YOU ARE PART
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jan 2015

of the BFEE? !!

I never knew there were so many connections!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
37. I post on DU about the BFEE and crimes of the national security state.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 04:32 PM
Jan 2015

Other than that, though, it's unusual to read about the BFEE anywhere, online, now that Bartcop's gone, or in the mainstream media, thanks to its Corporate Ownership.



An example from another person who has connected a few dots:



The Bush Family: A Continuing Criminal Enterprise?

Gary W. Potter, PhD.
Professor, Criminal Justice
Eastern Kentucky University

The S&Ls, the Mob and the Bushs

During the 1980's hundred of Savings and Loan Banks failed. Those bank failures cost U.S. taxpayers over $500 billion to cover federally insured losses, and much more to investigate the bank failures (Pizzo, Fricker, and Muolo, 1989; Brewton, 1992; Johnston, 1990). More than 75% of the Savings and Loan insolvencies where directly linked to serious and often criminal misconduct by senior financial insiders (Pizzo, Fricker and Muolo, 1989: 305). In fact, less than 10 percent of bank failures are related to economic conditions, the rest are caused by mismanagement or criminal conduct (Pizzo, Fricker and Muolo, 1989: 305).

A good example of the Savings and Loan failures can be found in the activities of Mario Renda, a Savings and Loan insider who often worked in close collaboration with organized crime (Pizzo, Fricker and Muolo, 1989: 123-126;302). Renda served as a middle man in arranging about $5 billion a year in deposits into 130 Savings and Loans, all of which failed (Kwitny, 1992: 27). Many of these deposits were made contingent on an agreement that the Savings and Loan involved would lend money to borrowers recommended by Renda, many of whom were organized crime figures or people entirely unknown to the banking institution involved (Kwitny, 1992: 27).

SNIP...

Prescott Bush: The Yakuza’s Frontman

Finally, and perhaps most seriously, the Bush family pioneered the practice which has now become commonplace of collaboration between corporate and organized criminals. Prescott Bush, uncle of the current President and brother of the former President, played a key role in helping the Japanese Yakuza extend their financial and real estate holdings to the United States. In 1989, Prescott Bush made arrangements for a front company for Japanese organized crime groups to buy into two U.S. corporations and to make a sizeable real investment in the U.S. (Helm, 1991a: 1; Isikoff, 1992: A1). West Tsusho, a Japanese corporation, was identified by Japanese police officials as a front company for one of that country’s largest organized crime syndicates. Prescott Bush was paid a fee of $500,000 for his help in negotiating West Tsusho’s purchase of controlling interest in Assets Management, a U.S. corporation (Helm, 1991a: 1; Isikoff, 1992: A1). Bush also assisted the Japanese mob in investing in Quantam Access, a U.S. software company, which was ultimately taken over by the Japanese (Helm, 1991b: 10; Isikoff, 1992: A1). Both companies ultimately went into bankruptcy (Isikoff, 1992: A1; Moses, 1992).

George Bush Sr.: Shutting Down the Organize Crime Strike Forces

Despite assessments from senior law enforcement officers and experts on organized crime that efforts to control organized crime would be crippled, in December 1989, the administration of George Bush, Sr. abolished all 14 regional organized crime strike forces (McAlister, 1989: A 21; Struck out, 1990). The organized crime strike had been created as independent entities so they would not be subject to political influences or bureaucratic wrangling within federal law enforcement. In the two decades of their operation the strike forces had secured convictions of major organized crime figures in several U.S. cities (Struck out, 1990). It is at the very least curious to note that the federal strike force in Miami had been responsible for indicting Miguel Recarey, the man for whom Jeb Bush had intervened with regulators. Organized crime strike forces had similarly indicted Mario Renda, the organized crime liaison to the S& L’s, as well as several other key figures in the Savings and Loan Fiasco (Pizzo, Fricker, and Mulolo, 1989: 112, 120-123, 303, 337).

CONTINUED...

http://critcrim.org/critpapers/potter.htm



That's the way a professor of criminal justice puts it. Me, to get a better handle on War Inc's first family, I call them the "BFEE" for short.

BTW: What have you ever posted about the BFEE or crimes of the national security state, snooper2?

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
50. There is a bunch of odd things about this case.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 03:38 AM
Jan 2015

What happens when you put an idealistic young dreamer into a hot war zone? Well, for one thing, Bergdahl wanted materials on Pashtun and Arabic culture and languages.

Now, if someone in my barracks is not drinking beer or smoking weed with me, and he's studying these materials, I might think that he is being prepared for a misson. People are quirky though and there is a small chance that Bergdahl was just genuinely interested in these cultures and liked the scorn it brought from his fellow soldiers, but I doubt that.

I've seen videotapes of the terrain and layout of his post. It was in a dangerous area surrounded by Taliban. Something really stinks bad about all this. IMO either Bergdahl had a mission and screwed it up royally or he was committing suicide.

This prosecution is outrageous. Why this attempt to punish him further?

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
52. I have no idea why you are criticized for pointing this out
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 03:46 AM
Jan 2015

"War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes." - Smedley Butler

On edit - I do know why but it is a little surprising to see so much of it on this board.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
56. some people in denial cant handle the implicit guilt of being part of the coverup
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 08:52 AM
Jan 2015

others are simply guilty.
Octafish makes DU worth the trouble.
why the trouble is an interesting question.
Im pretty sure "money" is the answer.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
53. For what it's worth, Octy's facts are worth far more than your snark
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 04:19 AM
Jan 2015

and I know snark because I deliver a lot of it myself. Back off. You are out of your league and I say this as a friend to you and Octafish. Oh, and you can call me a bitch because all the DU word culti-feminists hate me and won't alert on you.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
55. I think he's nuts, and I see no facts in evidence.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 08:46 AM
Jan 2015

But I've never had a harsh word for you and I never shall. I value your input and you help make DU a great place.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
58. If you knew what I know, you might be nuts, too.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 10:05 AM
Jan 2015

That may be why so few people know about the crimes, conspiracies and treasons. The subjects can be grotesque, if not maddening and "too complicated" to prosecute.

So, I try to source what I post: DUers can check the facts for themselves. When I am in error, I says "Thanks," and admit it.

I'd ask what you know, but that is obvious, Codeine. I'm not talking about the pretty mouth, either.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
14. I'd settle for Petraeus, since leaking official secrets got Kiriakou and Sperling
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

tried and convicted.

Tell me again, when will Petraeus be indicted?

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
16. Or maybe at least the collateral murder guys?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 01:56 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.collateralmurder.com/

Overview
Update: On July 6, 2010, Private Bradley Manning, a 22 year old intelligence analyst with the United States Army in Baghdad, was charged with disclosing this video (after allegedly speaking to an unfaithful journalist). The whistleblower behind the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg, has called Mr. Manning a 'hero'. He is currently imprisoned in Kuwait. The Apache crew and those behind the cover up depicted in the video have yet to be charged. To assist Private Manning, please see bradleymanning.org.

5th April 2010 10:44 EST WikiLeaks has released a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad -- including two Reuters news staff.

Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.



<edit>

After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own "Rules of Engagement".

more...
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
19. What would we charge them with? What Assange and Manning reported turned out to not be true
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:07 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/apr/14/julian-assange/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-tells-colbert-per/

In an April 12, 2010, interview on The Colbert Report, one of the WikiLeaks founders was pressed to explain why "Collateral Murder" was an accurate title for a leaked military video of a 3-year-old deadly encounter between a U.S. Apache helicopter gun crew and a cluster of men on a Baghdad street corner, two of whom were journalists for Reuters.

Host Stephen Colbert called the title "emotional manipulation." He noted that while soldiers in the Apache did mistake cameras with long telephoto lenses slung over the shoulders of the two journalists for weapons, there were, in fact, two other men in the group with weapons.

"How can you call it 'Collateral Murder?' " Colbert asked guest Julian Assange of Wikileaks, referring to the controversial and widely-viewed video.

"So it appears there are possibly two men, one carrying an AK-47 and one carrying a rocket-propelled grenade -- although we're not 100 percent sure of that -- in the crowd," Assange answered.

.
.
.
More at link above but I have to say, now that we have Assange admitting that in this crowd of 11 men, there are folks with automatic weapons and with RPGs (Rocket Propelled Grenades) is this an instance of US military "firing on civilians".

I think we can say with certainty that it isn't. And since this video was used by Manning to justify his leaking of all of his videos and documents to Wikileaks, what does that say for this justification?

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
23. This?
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:20 PM
Jan 2015
http://truth-out.org/news/item/16731-bradley-mannings-legal-duty-to-expose-war-crimes

Bradley Manning's Legal Duty to Expose War Crimes
Monday, 03 June 2013 09:29
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout | News Analysis

<edit>

The "Collateral Murder" video depicts a US Apache attack helicopter killing 12 civilians and wounding two children on the ground in Baghdad in 2007. The helicopter then fired on and killed the people trying to rescue the wounded. Finally, a US tank drove over one of the bodies, cutting the man in half. These acts constitute three separate war crimes.

Manning fulfilled his legal duty to report war crimes. He complied with his legal duty to obey lawful orders but also his legal duty to disobey unlawful orders.

Section 499 of the Army Field Manual states, "Every violation of the law of war is a war crime." The law of war is contained in the Geneva Conventions.

Article 85 of the First Protocol to the Geneva Conventions describes making the civilian population or individual civilians the object of attack as a grave breach. The firing on and killing of civilians shown in the "Collateral Murder" video violated this provision of Geneva.

Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions requires that the wounded be collected and cared for. Article 17 of the First Protocol states that the civilian population "shall be permitted, even on their own initiative, to collect and care for the wounded." That article also says, "No one shall be harmed . . . for such humanitarian acts." The firing on rescuers portrayed in the "Collateral Murder" video violates these provisions of Geneva.

Finally, Section 27-10 of the Army Field Manual states that "maltreatment of dead bodies" is a war crime. When the Army jeep drove over the dead body, it violated this provision.

more...
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
42. Yes, they do and very simply. The group fired on was armed with RPGs and other heavy weapons.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jan 2015

They were not unarmed civilians.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
39. You can read the politifact report for yourself and Assange acknowledged all of its points as true.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

You can 'wow' all you want. You are wrong about this one.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
45. First Amendment
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jan 2015

You of all people should know what this is about -- the ability of the People to know what the Government does in its name.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
47. You indicated Assange and Manning were proven wrong. How so?
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 11:35 AM
Jan 2015

Merely stating otherwise doesn't make it so. Nor does repeating what the government says make anything so.

I was hoping to help you understand what journalism is about.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
49. Assange admitted it. I provided the link to politifact upthread
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 02:52 AM
Jan 2015

Assange admits the group fired on had RPGs and other heavy weapons which means they were not unarmed civilians which means firing on them is not a war crime.

Simple. The only question is, can you face the facts here and acknowledge that what Assange and Manning led you to believe was wrong?

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
26. I'm glad they seem to be moving towards trying him in court.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jan 2015

He will finally have a fair chance to clear his name, after recovering physically and mentally from his ordeal. I expect he will lose, based on what little I know of the case, and I hope the court will take account of his experiences during captivity in determining his punishment. He's suffered enough already.

DinahMoeHum

(21,783 posts)
29. Sorry, but I don't have ANY faith in a military court. . .
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 02:59 PM
Jan 2015

. . .trying this case, especially if it's a matter of officers judging an enlisted man.

He's gonna get railroaded.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
31. You just can't handle the truth.
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:08 PM
Jan 2015

There are still honorable officers in the US military. Railroading him won't do anything to promote order and discipline in the ranks. We'll just have to see what happens.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
33. NBC's correspondent reported on one outcome considered likely:
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 03:14 PM
Jan 2015
While a court martial could lead to imprisonment, defense and military officials tell NBC News it is likely Bergdahl would be given consideration for the 5 years he spent in captivity and be permitted to leave the Army with a “less than honorable discharge.” If accepted, Bergdahl would be denied as much as $300,000 in back pay and bonuses, and reduced in rank to at least Private First Class, the rank he held when he disappeared from his outpost in Afghanistan.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bowe-bergdahl-face-desertion-charges

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
57. That's my guess too.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 09:17 AM
Jan 2015

That would mean a discharge that is not technically punitive, so it wouldn't necessarily mess up his future employment prospects. It would still mean a lot of pay and benefits down the drain, though.

gladium et scutum

(806 posts)
43. I believe that he
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 08:42 PM
Jan 2015

can request a military judge as opposed to a General Court Martial board. If he accepts a Court Martial board, he can request that an enlisted man be assigned to that board.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
40. UPDATE: Army says no actions, decision in Bergdahl investigation
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jan 2015

Army says no actions, decision in Bergdahl investigation

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - No actions or decisions have been made in the investigation of Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who was released last year in a prisoner swap with the Taliban after disappearing from his base in Afghanistan in 2009, a U.S. Army spokesman said on Tuesday.

Major General Ronald Lewis, head of public affairs for the U.S. Army, also said in the statement that media reports published earlier on Tuesday about the case "patently false."

NBC News earlier reported that Bergdahl would be charged with desertion, citing senior defense officials.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014999237

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING (NBC): Army Sgt....