11 Lies Netanyahu Told Congress on Iran
http://blogs.forward.com/forward-thinking/215878/-lies-netanyahu-told-congress-on-iran/
The case Netanyahu laid out against an Iran deal in his address to Congress revolves around 11 core arguments. Think they sound convincing? Look at those arguments one by one, and youll see why each of them is bogus....
Pressure in the form of sanctions especially multilateral, international sanctions helped convince Iran to come to the negotiating table. But Irans red lines in negotiations, including retaining some level of enrichment, are clear. Additional U.S. pressure now, aimed at forcing the Iranian regime to its knees, is far more likely to scuttle talks than to force greater Iranian flexibility, and the failure of diplomacy would be blamed on the U.S., not Iran. One result: no deal to curtail Irans nuclear program. Another result: strengthening those in Iran who support weaponization of the nuclear program as a deterrent against attack. And a third result: the almost certain collapse of the international sanctions regime, which has been critical to restraining Irans nuclear program so far....
Zero enrichment or complete dismantlement of Irans nuclear infrastructure is both unachievable and unnecessary. Its unachievable because just as U.S. negotiators must get a deal they can sell to their constituencies, Iranian negotiators must be able to sell a deal to their own constituencies as meeting their own red lines. And its unnecessary because assuming zero enrichment and complete dismantlement are genuinely shorthand for the best possible guarantee that Irans nuclear program will remain peaceful, this goal can be achieved through a nuclear agreement that includes strict limits on Irans enrichment capacity and stringent safeguards and transparency with respect to Irans nuclear facilities and materials. Insisting on zero enrichment or total dismantlement guarantees no deal which means it guarantees that such limits and safeguards are absent....
Any nuclear deal with Iran would be grounded in ongoing rigorous inspections and verification mechanisms not trust to ensure that Iran lived up to its end of a deal. Should Iran interfere with those inspections and verification mechanisms, or should those inspections and verification mechanisms reveal Iranian malfeasance, the international community would know immediately and have ample opportunity to prepare its response. Without an agreement, those rigorous inspections and verification mechanisms would be absent.