Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,589 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:49 PM Mar 2015

What Might Have Motivated Hillary Clinton To Use Personal Email

What Might Have Motivated Hillary Clinton To Use Personal Email

BY CLAY JOHNSON -- GUEST CONTRIBUTOR at Think Progress

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/03/04/3629650/hillary-clintons-private-email-tells-us-antiquated-government-technology/

"SNIP................


I love this story from the New York Times about Hillary Clinton using her personal email account for official Secretary of State business because it points to a serious fracture in transparency’s goals, its implementations and IT policy in Government. Take this choice quote from Thomas Blanton, the Director of the National Security Archive:

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Are you serious? Let’s be clear, that personal email was probably far more secure than her state.gov email account. The State Department’s email system has been compromised for months. It’s highly likely that it’s been compromised since forever: remember, during her tenure, Wikileaks released the State Department’s classified communications.

A better question is: why would she use the State Department’s email system to conduct official business? In fact, if it’s demonstrably insecure, does she not have a responsibility not to use it? It’s probably the case that if Hillary Clinton was focusing solely on security, using her personal email with 2 Factor Authentication was probably way more secure than using the honeypot mess of IT that is the State Department’s email servers.



................SNIP"
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Might Have Motivated Hillary Clinton To Use Personal Email (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2015 OP
I pointed out yesterday the generic email account was likely more secure Warpy Mar 2015 #1
An alias? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #4
It's a common WASP name Warpy Mar 2015 #12
The only thing that really matters Abq_Sarah Mar 2015 #2
A better question? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #3
aaaah...... BooScout Mar 2015 #5
So you're saying State has absolutely 0 funding to spend on IT? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #7
They have 200 million dollars plus at their disposal. Rex Mar 2015 #10
Did congress stop the state dep. from fixing there email? awake Mar 2015 #9
+100 ND-Dem Mar 2015 #14
She kept her email server in her toilet so she could check it every morning AngryAmish Mar 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #8
LOL...Release the Minion! Oilwellian Mar 2015 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #15
Because email is shit? hunter Mar 2015 #11

Warpy

(111,230 posts)
1. I pointed out yesterday the generic email account was likely more secure
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 09:05 PM
Mar 2015

simply because it was behind an alias and one of many hundreds of millions sent out that day, one needle in a huge haystack. No one would have paid any attention to it.

Not so the official, "secure" email account. The NSA pays particular attention to those and they have also been prone to hacking.

No email is ever really private and things live forever in cyberspace. If you want your mail to be private, you need to spend the money on a stamp--or schedule a diplomatic courier with a locked bag.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. An alias?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 10:59 PM
Mar 2015

Clintonemail.com?

My gods, who could have ever thought that it might be a server for emails for the Clintons with such a super secret domain name like that?

Abq_Sarah

(2,883 posts)
2. The only thing that really matters
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 09:54 PM
Mar 2015

Is that public officials don't get to route their official emails through their own private servers. I'm sure we can all agree that it's a practice that completely destroys any efforts at transparency. They weren't her emails, they belong to us.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. A better question?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 10:57 PM
Mar 2015

Why didn't she make it a top priority to FIX the State Department's email system during her tenure? Or any kind of priority at all? If it was such a wreck, surely that should have been one of the main things to focus on while she was there. Were no one else's emails at State important? Only hers needed to be handled through private servers, while it was fine for every other person's to go through the system that was so 'compromised'? If Hillary Clinton was so 'focused' on security, why wasn't she 'focused' on it for everything State did, as opposed to simply her own emails?

Isn't it the job of the person at the top to try to make sure everything below them is functioning efficiently? Or is it to 'fix' problems just for themselves, and ignore the same problems happening for everyone working under them?

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
7. So you're saying State has absolutely 0 funding to spend on IT?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:13 PM
Mar 2015

No discretion at all to hire on IT guys, no ability to direct their current staff to work on fixing the problem?

I find that highly unlikely.

I think your analogy fails.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
10. They have 200 million dollars plus at their disposal.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:33 PM
Mar 2015

So does that mean that during the BFEE years, Cheney and his crew of pirates never had to worry about their emails? I can't believe the State department has no way of getting her top rate security. Unless the people are you are trying to keep out are part of the government.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
6. She kept her email server in her toilet so she could check it every morning
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:13 PM
Mar 2015

There is nothing wrong here.

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Response to Oilwellian (Reply #13)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Might Have Motivated...