General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan the president use executive powers to make the all police wear cameras? Breaking news about
the situation in Ferguson by Attorney General Holder is fucking unbelievable! It proves a systematic attack on the black residents of Ferguson and much of it is done to make money.
The written articles will come out. I just saw this on Chris Hayes
But if there is any time to force the damn police to be followed then it is now
=========== One woman got 2 driving tickets for a price of $150. Now 2 years later she owes over $500 and she has been jailed for a total of 6 days. Eric Holder didn't even know why she owed all this extra money.
I'm adding this article for the people who have not seen the studies of police cameras.
New Publication Available: The Effect of Body-Worn Cameras on Police Use-of-Force
Police Foundation Executive Fellow, Chief Tony Farrar, recently completed an extensive yearlong study to evaluate the effect of body-worn video cameras on police use-of-force. This randomized controlled trail represents the first experimental evaluation of body-worn video cameras used in police patrol practices. Cameras were deployed to all patrol officers in the Rialto (CA) Police Department. Every police patrol shift during the 12-month period was assigned to experimental or control conditions.
Wearing cameras was associated with dramatic reductions in use-of-force and complaints against officers. The authors conclude:
"The findings suggest more than a 50% reduction in the total number of incidents of use-of-force compared to control-conditions, and nearly ten times more citizens complaints in the 12-months prior to the experiment."
http://www.policefoundation.org/content/body-worn-cameras-police-use-force
elleng
(130,834 posts)of course not. The FBI and other federal police-type corps? Yes. There are MANY individual jurisdictions throughout the country, which makes stuff confusing and difficult.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)They probably wouldn't, but it's conceivable they could.
tritsofme
(17,372 posts)But it's not something a president could mandate unilaterally.
elleng
(130,834 posts)Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Maraya1969
(22,474 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,832 posts)They only records what the cop sees. It doesn't record what a cop does.
Maraya1969
(22,474 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)unconscionable treatment of blacks in that community by police, however, our entire economic system is a systemic attack on all residents except the exceedingly wealthy.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Ferguson being horrible and cameras being effective do not translate to legal ground for an executive order.
What law do you propose the EO be attached to? They are an interpretation of laws in place not the ability to legislate.
Now, that isn't to say that no actions are possible at all to be perfectly clear here just that what you are asking isn't plausible at all. The DOJ can take serious measures in Ferguson.