General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoseph Farah, (head of WND) has a twfer today...
Talk about a blithering idiot...
(BTW, this "just asking" has earned the epithet "JAQing off."
Joseph Farah Is 'Just Asking': Will Obama Actually Leave Office In January 2017?
Submitted by Miranda Blue on Friday, 3/6/2015 11:02 am
WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah personally believes that President Obama will leave office when his second term is up in January 2017, but senses that there is great concern out there across the fruited plain that the president will try to stay in office permanently, so he evidently considers it his journalistic duty to explore why this conspiracy theory may be true. [W]hy do we assume Obama will step aside willingly from the presidency following an election in 2016? Farah asks in a column today. Im not saying he wont. Im just asking why. Farah then goes on to cite evidence of Obamas possible power grab, including that the president that respects neither the law nor the American tradition of peaceful changes of power, has said he and his family might remain in Washington after leaving office, and, of course, the ever-present reality that Obama himself may not even be constitutionally eligible for office.
- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/joseph-farah-just-asking-will-obama-actually-leave-office-january-2017#sthash.7HqpO6Op.dpuf
WND's Farah Is Just Not Down With All That Science Stuff
Topic: WorldNetDaily
Joseph Farah devoted his Feb. 26 WorldNetDaily column to a screed against science -- specifically attacking National Geographic for highlighting "the war against science":
Sadly, I dont have the time or space to refute and rebut every aspect of this full-throated endorsement of modern science as the new priesthood, whose conclusions are questioned at the threat of excommunication, not to mention humiliation in rational circles.
In short, if you doubt any conclusions of the modern scientific establishment, youre not only a rube, but you are dangerous.
Apparently, in the 20th or 21st centuries, science finally worked out all the bugs of the past and is now certain about all the big and little questions of life. There are no more mysteries. There is no more ambiguity. There are no more unknowns. There are no more doubts about matters like man-made catastrophic climate change, that evolution explains everything we need to know about the origins and diversity of life on the planet, vaccinations, genetically modified food and just about everything else.
Science is the final arbiter. Even though science has made innumerable blunders in the past, today science has it 100 percent right and there is no room for skepticism, this National Geographic opus concludes. If you question anything about sciences conclusions (as if all scientists are united on any of these matters), you might as well join the Flat Earth Society.
There are no nuances. There are no big questions left to answer. The new priesthood has spoken.
It never occurs to National Geographic that what they call science is actually a government-science complex with immense power, money and influence that is merely frustrated with its inability to coercively persuade everyone of their infinite wisdom even with control of the schools, the colleges, the universities, the major media, the museums, the zoos, the observatories, the medical schools, etc.
Among the things Farah's upset with is National Geographic's stand on the side global warming existing and vaccines helping people. But he engages in some old-school paranoia as well:
As for me and my house, we reject fluoride. Its getting harder and harder when the government adds this poison, which accumulates in your body, to your water supply. But we manage.
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/blog/index.blog?entry_id=2351733