Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 01:40 PM Mar 2015

Utilities wage campaign against rooftop solar

By Joby Warrick

Three years ago, the nation’s top utility executives gathered at a Colorado resort to hear warnings about a grave new threat to operators of America’s electric grid: not superstorms or cyberattacks, but rooftop solar panels.

If demand for residential solar continued to soar, traditional utilities could soon face serious problems, from “declining retail sales” and a “loss of customers” to “potential obsolescence,” according to a presentation prepared for the group. “Industry must prepare an action plan to address the challenges,” it said.

The warning, delivered to a private meeting of the utility industry’s main trade association, became a call to arms for electricity providers in nearly every corner of the nation. Three years later, the industry and its fossil-fuel supporters are waging a determined campaign to stop a home-solar insurgency that is rattling the boardrooms of the country’s government-regulated electric monopolies.

The campaign’s first phase—an industry push for state laws raising prices for solar customers—failed spectacularly in legislatures around the country, due in part to surprisingly strong support for solar energy from conservatives and evangelicals in traditionally “red states.” But more recently, the battle has shifted to public utility commissions, where industry backers have mounted a more successful push for fee hikes that could put solar panels out of reach for many potential customers.

more

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/utilities-sensing-threat-put-squeeze-on-booming-solar-roof-industry/2015/03/07/2d916f88-c1c9-11e4-ad5c-3b8ce89f1b89_story.html?hpid=z1

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. OK. Before anyone puts on their tin hat, they should READ material from the actual presentation:
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 01:59 PM
Mar 2015

It can be found here:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1374670-2012-eei-board-and-chief-executives-meeting.html#document/p48/a191712

The Post, here, is trying to foment outrage with an organization, the Edison Electric Institute, using ridiculous language rather than facts.

First of all, "private meetings" are common among all types of organizations. You can't just walk into an EEI meeting, or an Emily's list meeting, or an NREL meeting, there's no surprise there.

Secondly, EEI represents investor owned utilities which, like your favorite grocer or shoe seller, has to stay in business or be sold to another company which will have to, guess what, stay in business and be profitable.

So, three years ago, the organization sees more and more small installations on the horizon and they realize that a number of problems might occur:

Is the grid stable and robust enough to take on additional generation? (often no)

If fewer people are needing electrons from the utility, but are still connected in order to have power at night, and a place to send their surplus energy, what is a fair way to charge them for access to that grid?

If fewer people are using electricity but costs for maintaining the grid remain the same or rise, do regular customers have to start paying more???

>>>>These are all fair questions, but to many people utility companies are just big bad bullies out to rip us off.

It's a shame that people know so little about their electricity, the different sources used to create it, and how it gets to the customers.

Peace.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
2. Okay. But what about the furture? What about Carbon issues? What about freedom from fossil
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 02:12 PM
Mar 2015

fuels?

You are correct about the economic impact for utility companies. But what about the impact on our futures?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. In California, utilities' profits are decoupled from sales of electricity.
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 02:43 PM
Mar 2015

I'm on a tablet so hard to copy paste, but California state agencies encourage efficiency and renewable generation vigorously. The "loading order" and renewable energy generation incentives/mandates ensure continued deployment of carbon free generation technologies.

Sadly, other states aren't as progressive.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
4. And the timber industry.
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 02:36 PM
Mar 2015

Big business and corporate protectionism is exactly why the United States is no longer a leader in anything.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
7. You think the repubs have principles?
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 03:28 PM
Mar 2015

The only principle is "will this make me richer or give me more power?"

And a lot of Dems hold to the same 'ideal'

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
9. Of course not
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 04:12 PM
Mar 2015

Moreover, I don't think a neoliberal Democrat has any principles that haven't been sold to him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Utilities wage campaign a...