Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,022 posts)
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 09:34 PM Mar 2015

47 Republicans May Have Just Broken the Law By Writing An Outrageous Letter To Iran

Just when you thought congressional Republicans couldn’t look any more like a troupe of treacherous clowns hellbent on circus-ifying anything President Obama tries to do, they pull another bag of tricks from the trunk of their tiny car.

On Monday, 47 Republican senators signed an open letter addressed to the “Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” on U.S. Senate letterhead. The correspondence basically indicated that Iran’s ongoing negotiations on its nuclear program with the Obama administration are an all but futile endeavor. The weirdest thing about the letter — other than the fact that it was written in the first place — is that it doesn’t address anything specific regarding Iran’s nuclear program. It advances no alternative proposals, it elucidates no conditions under which the GOP would assent to a deal of any kind, and thus, it offers no hope of resolving one of the biggest U.S. foreign policy challenges of the last 35 years.

You’d think considering the letter is official correspondence from Senate Republicans, it would’ve addressed specific leaders within the Iranian government such as Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, President Hassan Rouhani, or the members of the Guardian Council, but it does not. Regardless, the letter is unlike anything seen in recent memory. Not only does it explicitly attempt to undermine negotiations between the U.S. and Iran concerning the latter’s nuclear program, it’s written in an unbelievably condescending tone:



Read more: http://thedailybanter.com/2015/03/how-not-to-do-diplomacy/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
47 Republicans May Have Just Broken the Law By Writing An Outrageous Letter To Iran (Original Post) Galraedia Mar 2015 OP
Is There A List Of The 47 That Signed This Letter & The Repugs That Didn't..... global1 Mar 2015 #1
This is the list - LiberalElite Mar 2015 #2
Who Are The Repugs That Didn't Sign This Letter?..... global1 Mar 2015 #5
Are you kidding? This list has names and states of the signers - Google LiberalElite Mar 2015 #7
I Ultimately Had To Do Just That.... global1 Mar 2015 #8
I hope the anger over this goes beyond DU world wide wally Mar 2015 #3
Each and every one of them should be impeached/recalled. nt Terra Alta Mar 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #6

global1

(25,241 posts)
1. Is There A List Of The 47 That Signed This Letter & The Repugs That Didn't.....
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 09:49 PM
Mar 2015

I'm thinking there are more than 47 Repug Senators. That means some didn't sign this letter. They should be asked why they decided not to sign this letter. I'm thinking there will be some interesting answers.

global1

(25,241 posts)
5. Who Are The Repugs That Didn't Sign This Letter?.....
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 10:40 PM
Mar 2015

I got to think there are a few that didn't sign on. Again - some smart reporter has to pigeonhole the non-signers and ask them why they didn't add their name to the letter. Will they give some lame excuse or will they say that they didn't want to be part of a sabotaging effort. We got to get them on record.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
7. Are you kidding? This list has names and states of the signers - Google
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 06:57 AM
Mar 2015

the senate website, compare names and whoever's left didn't sign it.

global1

(25,241 posts)
8. I Ultimately Had To Do Just That....
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 08:01 AM
Mar 2015

to get the 7 names. One would think some aspiring journalists would have approached this story from the direction of the non-signers. To me that is a most interesting perspective of this story. Usually the Repugs do things enmasse. I want to know why 7 Repug senators went against the Party. To me that is where the story is. These 7 could sink the 47 signers.

Response to Galraedia (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»47 Republicans May Have J...