Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,525 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 08:58 PM Mar 2015

75% of Denver Cops Aren’t Turning on Body Cams in Use of Force Contacts, This is Why

75% of Denver Cops Aren’t Turning on Body Cams in Use of Force Contacts, This is Why
By Matt Agorist on March 14, 2015




Denver, CO — A local news team in Denver has obtained video twice in just one week of officers brutalizing individuals. Both time the officers were disciplined after it was exposed.

The latest cop to be caught using excessive force on an arrestee is officer Chad Sinnema. Sinnema was suspended for a mere four days after using force that could have killed a man back in August.

CBS 4 obtained video from a Denver police department body camera that was rolling Aug. 22, 2014, when officers apprehended a suspect in a domestic violence incident in downtown Denver.

During the arrest, the suspect resisted, according to police, by kicking and pushing at officers. However, that is not seen on video, nor were any of the officers injured. However, it was after he was subdued when Sinnema’s use of excessive force came out.

According to Sinnema, his knee was on the back of this man’s shoulders when he was holding him down.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/75-denver-cops-turning-body-cams-force-contacts/#l5JRDm6ETbvFRCSK.99

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
75% of Denver Cops Aren’t Turning on Body Cams in Use of Force Contacts, This is Why (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2015 OP
Shoulders? That knee is on the back of the guy's neck. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #1
Only way to get compliance is, "No picture No pay." Downwinder Mar 2015 #2
I'm good with that. Iggo Mar 2015 #4
No footage = instant termination BrotherIvan Mar 2015 #5
sounds like dpd fizzgig Mar 2015 #3
That's why we told you officers shouldn't be allowed to turn them on and off. Trillo Mar 2015 #6
My favorite was "What if some woman's boob pops out in a scuffle with the cops?" Iggo Mar 2015 #9
I have one thing to say. Fuck that prick. He's no cop. Lint Head Mar 2015 #7
He is a cop. That's how they do. Iggo Mar 2015 #10
There must be consequences. Let's get serious. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #8

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Shoulders? That knee is on the back of the guy's neck.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:38 PM
Mar 2015

The guy really is lucky he wasn't killed, and that's exactly why we need body cameras that can't be turned off by police during their shifts.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
5. No footage = instant termination
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 10:32 PM
Mar 2015

If the camera was working when the officer left the station, it should work all day.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
6. That's why we told you officers shouldn't be allowed to turn them on and off.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:05 PM
Mar 2015

"Oh, but what about when they're in hospitals, cops have to protect patients privacy."
(paraphrase from memory)

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
9. My favorite was "What if some woman's boob pops out in a scuffle with the cops?"
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 11:53 AM
Mar 2015

And then "What if that video ends up on the internet?"

Like that was the perfect reason not to monitor the police to make sure they aren't murdering people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»75% of Denver Cops Aren’t...