Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:37 AM Mar 2015

The Case for Al Gore in 2016

Al Gore should run for president

Ezra Klein: “To many Democrats, the fight the party needs is clear: Hillary Clinton vs. Elizabeth Warren. But the differences between Warren and Clinton are less profound than they appear. Warren goes a bit further than Clinton does, both in rhetoric and policy, but her agenda is smaller and more traditional than she makes it sound: tightening financial regulation, redistributing a little more, tying up some loose ends in the social safety net. Given the near-certainty of a Republican House, there is little reason to believe there would be much difference between a Warren presidency and a Clinton one.”

“The most ambitious vision for the Democratic Party right now rests with a politician most have forgotten, and who no one is mentioning for 2016: Al Gore. Gore offers a genuinely different view of what the Democratic Party — and, by extension, American politics — should be about.”

He would have MY vote - unequivocally:
http://www.vox.com/2015/3/16/8220537/al-gore-president-2016
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Aristus

(66,327 posts)
1. I'd vote for him for sure.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:40 AM
Mar 2015

But he won't run. I think he's done with the political sphere. Plus, his divorce might make this difficult. Being a divorcee didn't hurt Reagan's chances, but the right-wing fuckwits who worship ole St. Ron didn't care about stuff like that.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. Has Gore expressed any indication he would run? I can't imagine he would have any
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:44 AM
Mar 2015

desire to do so...not that I would blame him at all.

kickysnana

(3,908 posts)
3. But will he willingly hand over the Presidency again.?
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:45 AM
Mar 2015

I do respect him. He was doing what he was told according to Sen Welstone's staff. Do not respect the Dems that allowed the theft of the 2000 election to happen.

A Constitutional crisis would have been far better for everyone than the horrors that have happened since.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
4. Totally agree. I also think John Kerry could have waited more than 12 hours to concede and/or
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 12:42 PM
Mar 2015

questioned the skeazy things that happened in Ohio.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
5. If there is even a whiff of this, you'll see republican commercials
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 12:46 PM
Mar 2015

that say something along the lines of "Al Gore, the guy who sold out to Al Jazeera..."

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
6. They are going to come out with hit pieces on whoever gets the nomination.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 03:33 PM
Mar 2015

We could do much worse than Al Gore.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. No, no thanks Dems don't need old DLC retreads
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 03:45 PM
Mar 2015

Notwithstanding Gore has done an ok job with climate change...the time of corporate pandering DLCers is near its final end.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
14. Little difference between Warren and Clinton?
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 07:59 AM
Mar 2015

what complete bullshit!

This really isn't about Gore, it's about dampening enthusiasm for Warren.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Case for Al Gore in 2...