Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 07:02 PM Mar 2015

I haven't thought about this guy in the last 3 or 4 FU's.

(note: FU is a Friedman Unit--which is 6 months--see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_Unit)

Without further ado, because I know how much DU has missed the wisdom of this blowhard, I give you Thomas Friedman:
--

Thomas Friedman asks if US should arm ISIS to fix problems created by policies he supported

“Should we be arming ISIS?”

That’s the question New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman poses today, writing that while he loathes the terrorist group, also known as the Islamic State, it’s not as if the Shiite militias fighting ISIS in Iraq would govern much better:

O.K., so we learn to live with Iran on the edge of a bomb, but shouldn’t we at least bomb the Islamic State to smithereens and help destroy this head-chopping menace? Now I despise ISIS as much as anyone, but let me just toss out a different question: Should we be arming ISIS? Or let me ask that differently: Why are we, for the third time since 9/11, fighting a war on behalf of Iran?

In 2002, we destroyed Iran’s main Sunni foe in Afghanistan (the Taliban regime). In 2003, we destroyed Iran’s main Sunni foe in the Arab world (Saddam Hussein). But because we failed to erect a self-sustaining pluralistic order, which could have been a durable counterbalance to Iran, we created a vacuum in both Iraq and the wider Sunni Arab world. That is why Tehran’s proxies now indirectly dominate four Arab capitals: Beirut, Damascus, Sana and Baghdad.

ISIS, with all its awfulness, emerged as the homegrown Sunni Arab response to this crushing defeat of Sunni Arabism — mixing old pro-Saddam Baathists with medieval Sunni religious fanatics with a collection of ideologues, misfits and adventure-seekers from around the Sunni Muslim world. Obviously, I abhor ISIS and don’t want to see it spread or take over Iraq. I simply raise this question rhetorically because no one else is: Why is it in our interest to destroy the last Sunni bulwark to a total Iranian takeover of Iraq? Because the Shiite militias now leading the fight against ISIS will rule better? Really?

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/18/thomas_friedman_asks_if_us_should_arm_isis_to_fix_problems_created_by_policies_he_supported/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I haven't thought about this guy in the last 3 or 4 FU's. (Original Post) DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2015 OP
He is making this too complicated, why dont we bomb ALL brown people to smithereens, this way NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #1
Not ALL brown people. He gets all his material from Middle Eastern cab drivers. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2015 #2
Thanks for the reminder on Friedman Units. I'd forgotten that bit of pundit idiocracy . . . Journeyman Mar 2015 #3

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
1. He is making this too complicated, why dont we bomb ALL brown people to smithereens, this way
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 07:07 PM
Mar 2015

nothing is left to chance...

right?

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
2. Not ALL brown people. He gets all his material from Middle Eastern cab drivers.
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 07:10 PM
Mar 2015

So he needs them to keep driving cabs.

Journeyman

(15,023 posts)
3. Thanks for the reminder on Friedman Units. I'd forgotten that bit of pundit idiocracy . . .
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 08:25 PM
Mar 2015

As for Thomas, think I'll go another dozen FU's, or maybe just one big one (and gift it to Thomas), and pass on reading him today. My life will be better for it, I'm sure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I haven't thought about t...