General Discussion

tonybgood

(218 posts) Fri Mar 27, 2015, 11:42 AM Mar 2015

I think the NFL has found a team to move to Los Angeles: The Indianapolis Colts!

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think the NFL has found a team to move to Los Angeles: The Indianapolis Colts! (Original Post) tonybgood Mar 2015 OP

If only your dream was true riversedge Mar 2015 #1

Time to petition the league. tonybgood Mar 2015 #2

They certainly SHOULDN'T, but I don't find that they were as welcoming to... MANative Mar 2015 #3

move the combine. KG Mar 2015 #4

Perfect. GeorgeGist Mar 2015 #5

Wouldn't that be the best burn ever? Initech Mar 2015 #6

Ok but they have to do it after midnight hootinholler Mar 2015 #7

riversedge

(70,183 posts)

1. If only your dream was true

Reply to tonybgood (Original post)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 11:45 AM

Mar 2015

tonybgood

(218 posts)

2. Time to petition the league.

Reply to riversedge (Reply #1)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:16 PM

Mar 2015

There is no way the NFL can turn a blind eye to this kind of discrimination.

MANative

(4,112 posts)

3. They certainly SHOULDN'T, but I don't find that they were as welcoming to...

Reply to tonybgood (Reply #2)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:32 PM

Mar 2015

Michael Sam as I would have liked to see. It seems clear that there are still closeted players in the NFL; the league has a lot of work to do in LGBT support. Encouraging the Colts to move to LA over it would be great, but not nearly enough.

KG

(28,751 posts)

4. move the combine.

Reply to tonybgood (Original post)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:34 PM

Mar 2015

GeorgeGist

(25,318 posts)

5. Perfect.

Reply to tonybgood (Original post)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:26 PM

Mar 2015

Initech

(100,060 posts)

6. Wouldn't that be the best burn ever?

Reply to tonybgood (Original post)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:35 PM

Mar 2015

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)

7. Ok but they have to do it after midnight

Reply to tonybgood (Original post)

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 04:48 PM

Mar 2015

And not tell anyone they're moving.

Reply to this discussion