Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking via AP Tweet - Harry Reid endorses Chuck Schumer as his replacement. (Original Post) MANative Mar 2015 OP
Link from LBN bigwillq Mar 2015 #1
Thanks! MANative Mar 2015 #3
No problem bigwillq Mar 2015 #8
Harry Reid II. nt Zorra Mar 2015 #2
Pretty much. nt MANative Mar 2015 #5
ugh tk2kewl Mar 2015 #4
I'll grant, though, that he does know the Senate and its procedures well. MANative Mar 2015 #7
and he loves his Wall St. GeorgeGist Mar 2015 #20
This Is A Snub To Durbin And ...... global1 Mar 2015 #6
Agreed. nt MANative Mar 2015 #9
Of course Reid is doing this. But Wall Street Dems have got to GO! RiverLover Mar 2015 #10
Being a NY senator, I imagine that he takes an awful lot of $$ from this "constituency" n/t MANative Mar 2015 #12
Yuck - Wall Street's best bud tularetom Mar 2015 #11
He talks a great game in front of the cameras, but his votes and positions are a different story. nt MANative Mar 2015 #13
I disagree with Reid. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #14
I wouldn't argue with any of your characterizations. MANative Mar 2015 #15
She may yet be the choice. This isn't a constitutional monarchy. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #16
You make a very fine point! The "blessing" isn't the vote. nt MANative Mar 2015 #17
Leahey(sic) is a much better choice still_one Mar 2015 #18
No thanks. truebrit71 Mar 2015 #19
From one piss poor leader to another LittleBlue Mar 2015 #21
I really think it would be a bad move. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #22

MANative

(4,112 posts)
7. I'll grant, though, that he does know the Senate and its procedures well.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:10 PM
Mar 2015

Wouldn't be my ideological top choice.

global1

(25,241 posts)
6. This Is A Snub To Durbin And ......
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:09 PM
Mar 2015

the wrong person for the job IMHO - though Schumer is a seasoned veteran of the Senate.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
10. Of course Reid is doing this. But Wall Street Dems have got to GO!
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:12 PM
Mar 2015

Posted this on another thread, but its even more relevant here~

Chuck Schumer and the Democrats' Identity Crisis: Economic Policy vs. Rhetoric
Dec 2014

...Unfortunately, Schumer embodies the contradictions that will tear the Democratic Party apart over the next two years. He understands the need to embrace a populist, progressive narrative and program, but his ties to Wall Street and big money lead him to blunt any real moves by Democrats to take a bold stand for working people against corporate power.

The budget proposal to allow more government bailouts of banks that gamble with their depositors’ money was a huge lost opportunity for Democrats to paint Republicans as being on the side of the big banks that wrecked the economy. That opportunity was negated by President Obama’s pushing for the budget and Senator Schumer’s stealth maneuvers (widely known in Congress) to keep the Wall Street deal intact. As a result, the leaders of both parties demonstrated, as they’ve done before, that government is in fact on the side of the rich and powerful....

http://www.nextnewdeal.net/chuck-schumer-and-democrats-identity-crisis-economic-policy-vs-rhetoric

MANative

(4,112 posts)
13. He talks a great game in front of the cameras, but his votes and positions are a different story. nt
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:19 PM
Mar 2015
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. I disagree with Reid.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:21 PM
Mar 2015

Schumer has a lot of flaws. Patty Murray would be a much better choice.

His positives are:

1) not in danger of losing re-election, giving him flexibility in what he would do as majority leader;
2) savvy on rules;
3) a partisan that the Republicans hate

Negatives:

He's Chuck Schumer.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
15. I wouldn't argue with any of your characterizations.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:22 PM
Mar 2015

I do like Patty, too. She would have been a fine choice.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
16. She may yet be the choice. This isn't a constitutional monarchy.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 12:25 PM
Mar 2015

Reid won't even get to vote on the next Senate leader.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
22. I really think it would be a bad move.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 03:26 PM
Mar 2015

Not as bad as some feel it would be, but I think there are better options. That being said, most of us could have told you Schumer would be tapped years ago. The signs were pretty clear.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking via AP Tweet - H...