HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Has Hillary said anything...

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:24 PM

 

Has Hillary said anything about bankster's threats to withhold donations over Warren's statements?

It's been widely reported that Wall Street banksters have threatened to withhold donations to Democratic candidates if Elizabeth Warren continues to publicly pillory them.

I've not seen any comments from Hillary Clinton on this matter. A Google search came up empty.

I would hope that any good Democrat would be outraged. Does anyone have any links to statements from Ms. Clinton on this matter?

71 replies, 3308 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 71 replies Author Time Post
Reply Has Hillary said anything about bankster's threats to withhold donations over Warren's statements? (Original post)
Scuba Mar 2015 OP
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #1
leftofcool Mar 2015 #3
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #7
Autumn Mar 2015 #22
leftofcool Mar 2015 #26
Autumn Mar 2015 #47
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #56
Autumn Mar 2015 #57
Scuba Mar 2015 #11
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #13
Scuba Mar 2015 #14
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #15
Scuba Mar 2015 #16
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #19
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #27
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #30
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #31
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #52
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #59
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #64
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #32
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #36
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #38
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #40
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #43
Scuba Mar 2015 #53
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #58
L0oniX Mar 2015 #66
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #67
eridani Mar 2015 #20
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #21
1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #54
wyldwolf Mar 2015 #55
1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #63
mylye2222 Mar 2015 #2
leftofcool Mar 2015 #4
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #34
2banon Mar 2015 #70
brooklynite Mar 2015 #5
Fumesucker Mar 2015 #8
brooklynite Mar 2015 #9
Fumesucker Mar 2015 #12
cali Mar 2015 #17
brooklynite Mar 2015 #18
Autumn Mar 2015 #23
Autumn Apr 2015 #71
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #35
tracks29 Mar 2015 #6
Maedhros Mar 2015 #10
Sienna86 Mar 2015 #24
winter is coming Mar 2015 #25
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #37
winter is coming Mar 2015 #45
elehhhhna Mar 2015 #28
NBachers Mar 2015 #29
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #33
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #39
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #41
rhett o rick Mar 2015 #42
JaneyVee Mar 2015 #44
PDittie Mar 2015 #49
bullwinkle428 Mar 2015 #62
Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #46
brooklynite Mar 2015 #48
joshcryer Mar 2015 #50
Warren DeMontague Mar 2015 #51
99Forever Mar 2015 #61
Sunlei Mar 2015 #60
L0oniX Mar 2015 #65
Oilwellian Mar 2015 #69
Oilwellian Mar 2015 #68

Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:32 PM

1. Has Sanders/Webb/O'Malley/Biden... Feingold said anything about it?

I've not seen any comments from Sanders/Webb/O'Malley/Biden... Feingold on this matter. A Google search came up empty.

I would hope that any good Democrat would be outraged. Does anyone have any links to statements from Sanders/Webb/O'Malley/Biden... Feingold on this matter?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:43 PM

3. I haven't see a thing.

Also note, I did not see anything from the above mentioned Dems including Warren on the Indiana fiasco. I did see a tweet from Hillary though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:49 PM

7. ah! VERY good observation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:11 PM

22. What did she tweet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Autumn (Reply #22)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:41 PM

26. Paraphrasing.......She was disappointed that American had come to this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #26)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:10 PM

47. America? The banks threatening blackmail are America?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Autumn (Reply #47)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:24 PM

56. What does Indiana have to do with banks?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #56)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:50 PM

57. The OP is about banks threatening to withhold money because of Liz.

The poster posted he had seen a tweet from Hillary. I asked what she had tweeted. I see now the poster was not talking about the OP subject because I went back and read your post and Hillary's tweet was not about the banks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6429167

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:07 PM

11. None of those you mentioned are considered the leading Democratic Presidential candidate, nor ...

 

... are any of them on record saying banker-bashing is "unproductive and foolish."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #11)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:12 PM

13. So they're not 'good Democrats?' That's the qualifier you set in your OP

The qualifier wasn't whether they were considered the leading Democratic Presidential candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #13)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:15 PM

14. I'm expecting good Democrats to be outraged, and the leading candidate and bankster-buddy...

 

... to go on the record about their threats.

If you don't, that's your business.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #14)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:37 PM

15. that isn't what you said in your OP. Are you changing it now because those others don't meet...

... your standards for a 'good Democrat' either?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #15)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:39 PM

16. I'm asking if banker-buddy Hillary is on record. My question has nothing to do with others.

 

But your lame attempts to derail the thread are noted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #16)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:47 PM

19. your OP's qualifier was 'good Democrats.' Obviously anyone who hasn't spoken on the topic...

... is NOT a good Democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #15)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:56 PM

27. You are playing cute word games when you know the banksters didn't mean they'd

 

withhold money from H. Clinton's campaign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #27)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:03 PM

30. I'm holding the OP to his exact words.

Has Hillary said anything about bankster's threats to withhold donations over Warren's statements? I've not seen any comments from Hillary Clinton on this matter. A Google search came up empty. I would hope that any good Democrat would be outraged. Does anyone have any links to statements from Ms. Clinton on this matter?


Not a peep from Sanders or the rest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #30)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:14 PM

31. And that's your defense for why H. Clinton is hiding under her desk until after the election?

 

She knows she has big money behind her and can coast in. The bottom line is that Sen Warren is willing to take on the banks and H. Clinton is willing to take their money.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #31)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:46 PM

52. Why rhett o rick, wherever did you get I was defending anyone?

I'm just making sure the OP holds his heroes to the same high standards he's placing on Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #52)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:44 AM

59. That doesn't even make sense. HRC is the number one contender for the Presidency.

 

You want to deflect attention from her positions on issues because on economic issues, foreign policy, and controlling the NSA/CIA Security State, her stands are glaringly different than those of progressive Democrats. The longer she can go w/o debating her stands on those issues, the better for her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #59)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:42 AM

64. It makes perfect sense. Look, here's your world:

the number one contender for the Presidency, who is still unannounced, is held to a higher standard than your progressive heroes. Or so you say when it's convenient.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #14)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:17 PM

32. She hasn't even announced yet.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #32)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:24 PM

36. You continue to post that same post. Why? Do you think it will somehow stop

 

the concerns over Clinton's ties to Wall Street?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #36)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:27 PM

38. OP is wondering why only the Democratic front-runner hasn't made a statement...

 

She hasn't even announced yet. Why would she have to answer for every insignificant news item?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #38)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:36 PM

40. You view this as an "insignificant news item"? The big banks just fired a shot across

 

the bow of the Democratic Party, essentially warning them to sit down and shut up. I would think that H. Clinton would have a comment running or not. And let's be clear, she is running now, just hasn't announced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #40)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:03 PM

43. Who cares. It's voluntary donations.

 

What would Hillary say? "I'm pissed off Wall Street won't voluntarily give Democrats campaign cash!" ? I'm sure that if she decides to run someone will ask her about it and she will answer. But this griping about her not releasing a statement immediately is silly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #40)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:00 PM

53. Yep, but some obviously don't get it. Dems in Congress have been ordered to get in line.

 

Now we'll see what they're made of, and I don't think we're going to like it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #53)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:39 AM

58. The Party is polarizing. More and more Democrats will have to pick a side.

 

Change or status quo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #58)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:52 AM

66. Stand with and for the 1% or stand with and for the common person.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to L0oniX (Reply #66)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:59 AM

67. I think this is why HRC is keeping quiet. Sooner of later she will have to show how

 

she differs from the Progressive Wing of the party. She will be compared with Sen Warren whether Sen Warren runs or not. And just like 2008 a good share of the Party will be seeking someone progressive and HRC will not suffice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:05 PM

20. You didn't look in the right places

Sanders: TPP Trade Deal a ‘Disaster’
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-tpp-trade-deal-a-disaster

Biden's another Clinton, but recognizes public pushback
http://ultraculture.org/blog/2014/02/14/tpp-hold-according-biden/
The White House’s trade plans are on hold, at least for now, Vice President Joe Biden said Friday, in welcome news to many Democrats who oppose the sweeping deals.

Webb is for it--forget about him
http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2010/07/20100702115824ihecuor0.9951985.html#ixzz3ViS98G6J
Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Senator Jim Webb, chairman of the committee’s East Asian and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee, expressed congressional support for the TPP in a June 14 joint statement:

Feingold seems to be against.
http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/trade-issues/why-is-the-fair-trade-for-our-future-resolution-important/
The Fair Trade for Our Future resolution is being co-sponsored in the House by Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Rep. George Miller (D-CA), Rep. Jack Quinn (R-NY), Rep. Hilda Solis (D-CA), Rep. Steve LaTourette (R-OH) and Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN). The leader in the Senate is Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI). Both resolutions are open for broad co-sponsorship and we hope to work on gathering co-sponsors into 2004.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:08 PM

21. That isn't what the OP is talking about

He asked if Clinton has said anything about bankster's threats to withhold donations over Warren's statements because all good Democrats should.

I asked if Sanders and the rest have. He's not answered that yet and neither did you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:18 PM

54. Shhh. You're ruining a perfectly good anti-HRC narrative! n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:23 PM

55. they're twisting themselves in knots over this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wyldwolf (Reply #55)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:57 AM

63. That's because this whole thing comes from a very twisted place ...

 

it's just a[strike] thinly veiled, and[/strike] not well thought out (as you have shown) anti-HRC hit.

{Edited to remove: "thinly veiled,"}

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:38 PM

2. She will not say anything...

 

This is frightening. I hope Sen. Warren will be OK.
WHat is happenning sounds like the 1980th when then Sen.Kerry investigated CIA drug runnings and BCCI. And Bill Clinton pardonned the criminals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mylye2222 (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:45 PM

4. Well, according to her supporters she does not need any money from bankers to run for Prez

She has plenty of money. She is in the 1% so I am sure she is doing just fine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #4)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:20 PM

34. The Clinton's have a personal fortune of over $100,000,000 but I doubt that

 

they will spend a dime. In fact I bet their fortune continues to grow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mylye2222 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:12 AM

70. Ding ding ding ding!

 

Kerry was just tying up the final preparations on these investigations for indictments and charges to be made, and then he received an order to cease and desist. That cease and desist order must have come with very serious threats to Kerry's personal or financial well being, because he hasn't been his own person since. The only thing that makes sense to me. Warren will soon get the same memo I think we will know when it happens. She'll be very quite about a number of issues she's been quite vocal about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:46 PM

5. Why would ANY politician comment on the issue of voluntary contributions to political groups?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #5)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:50 PM

8. Some of them were just threatened with cutting off a major source of funding?

Just a guess of course...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fumesucker (Reply #8)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:00 PM

9. People are threatened with having contributions dropped all the time...

One lesson of politics is never criticize the hand that used to feed you. It's a sure way of never getting their support again. Remember, we're talking about VOLUNTARY contributions.

I've told several Senators I was cutting off my support because of a political issue I disagreed with. That's politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #9)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:11 PM

12. Cutting off an entire party from funding due to the words of one member is a little unsusual

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #9)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:41 PM

17. baloney. The record is rife of politicians returning contributions.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #17)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:45 PM

18. ...when the contributor is toxic. Not No with a simple difference of opinion on policy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #9)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:13 PM

23. That's a great thing to do. I have told some Democrats I am withholding

my vote because of issues I disagree with Like Hillary. I don't have deep pockets like you do. All I have is a vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Autumn (Reply #23)


Response to brooklynite (Reply #5)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:22 PM

35. The banks are making a blatant threat. Politicians will notice. nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:49 PM

6. She doesn't have to but...

My feelings towards her would go up tremendously. It would be quite the statement to the Democratic doubters if she stood up with Warren.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 04:04 PM

10. If they follow through, there goes her funding advantage.[n/t]

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:31 PM

24. Don't believe she has addressed the threat.

I'm sure it puts her in a difficult position, with the Foundation and all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:40 PM

25. Has any politician other than Warren commented on it? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winter is coming (Reply #25)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:26 PM

37. Yes my local councilperson did. What are you insinuating? nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #37)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:17 PM

45. I wasn't "insinuating" anything.

I was merely wondering whether none, few, or many politicians other than Warren had already made a statement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 05:56 PM

28. lol that story mustbe buried or

 

We might/ figure out its all a racket.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:02 PM

29. A Probing Question for Our Times! This thread deserves hours or research, and thousands of replies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:20 PM

33. OP's like this are why America thinks progressives are too insufferable.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #33)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:33 PM

39. America thinks progressives are too insufferable? Please show me a link.

 

Do you think progressives like Sen Warren and Sen Sanders are too insufferable? I think you might be siding with the big banks and want all progressives to sit down and shut up. Centrists might be told to "toe the line" but I don't think you or the big banks or Rahmbo are going to have much success in getting progressives to sit down and shut up.

By the way, on which issues do you disagree with progressives other than un-regulated big banks? And Fracking? And Free (not Fair) Trade and the TPP? the Patriot Act? Indefinite detention? Cutting Social Security? Help me out. Where do you differ from the progressive wing of the Party?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #39)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:57 PM

41. Oh I didn't say me, I said America.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #41)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:01 PM

42. OK, but how did you find out what America thinks? And doesn't America include you? nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #42)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:10 PM

44. I'm active in national politics.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #33)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:22 PM

49. I don't think that's what America thinks.

Completely ridiculous assertion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #33)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:57 AM

62. Do you find Bernie Sanders insufferable? He looks pretty darn progressive to me.

For the record, I don't find him insufferable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:34 PM

46. Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!

 

Don't mind me I'm just practicing the standard Hillary Fan Club(tm) response to uncomfortable questions about how their candidate operates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Man from Pickens (Reply #46)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:12 PM

48. Would it be anything like how Elizabeth Warren supporters react?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:27 PM

50. I thought democrats shouldn't take their dirty money?

I don't see Clinton commenting on such silliness.

Meanwhile Warren has failed to co-sponsor the "Follow the Money Act."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:33 PM

51. Oh, now I understand some of the other psychodramas currently playing in GD.

I strongly suspect that Hillary knows not to say nasty things about potential donors, especially on the subject of donations per se. I mean, lets be real.


I'm more interested in hearing how she feels about the CARERS act. Has she issued a statement there? Seems to me any 2016 candidate is going to need to address the conflict btw. Federal and State marijuana law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #51)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:48 AM

61. I see.

You consider your want to get high more important than Wall St blackmailing the Democratic Party because one of it's key people has the audacity to point out their corruption.

I guess it's pretty clear where your priorities lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 08:47 AM

60. good then banks can cutback on the 2% they take from every debitcard transaction & start paying inte

start paying at least 2% interest on consumer accounts.

No more $6.00 check charge every time someone tries to cash a $25 check Chase bank.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 09:46 AM

65. This is going to be a missed huge opportunity for the Democratic party...

 

...to stand with the common people against the oligarchy. Let the repukes stand out as the party of the 1% ...and the Democrats for the common people.

Here's the Dem campaign ad: Do you wonder why the majority of campaign ads are for republicans? That's because the 1% is paying for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to L0oniX (Reply #65)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:09 AM

69. The silence of the Dems is deafening

It's very telling as to who really controls our government. Total corruption.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Original post)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:04 AM

68. Ha! Fat chance.

Which is why Hillary Kissinger Goldman Sachs Clinton will lose another primary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread