General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe end of the cow
No, not the rump or tail - but cloned meat . Article says the price of producing a kilo (2.5 pounds) of "artificial" meat has dropped from $10,000 to $80 and is still going down in price as the process is refined.
"From a small piece of muscle you can produce 10,000 kilos of meat"
Mixed feelings on this. Can see the positive side in that cattle raising is really ineffective, wasteful and somewhat cruel. However, the idea of meat grown in a lab is somewhat unsettling. Quick, someone post a picture of Dr. Frankenstein screaming, "It's Alive!!!".
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2015/s4205857.htm
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)creamed in this thread, right? Hope you have thick skin!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I'm grilling top sirloin tonight. Happy trails and bleus skies!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Hope yours turns out as good as mine did. I mostly like mine with the breath knocked out of it
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)Keep mooving, nothing to see here
treestar
(82,383 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)'The Streets of Laredo' at 2:10...
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...but then she cleared it right up with that new MRSA cow med.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)thucythucy
(8,045 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I have a haunch we can do it!
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Let's don't go there..........
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...or to engage in a cheep attempt to extend the the thread by introducing a chicken pun theme. What a poultry excuse!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)now that it got interesting
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Otherwise, it just sounds cheesy.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)You knew that was coming, right?
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)But I'm willing to try an alternative to my Chateau briand.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Still, it cud be bovine intervention steering us from our udderly e-veal taste for meat.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)He ran a great campaigne!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and even remember Pat Paulsen's Half A Comedy Hour.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)and the fear and pain experienced by those poor animals.
vt_native
(484 posts)I couldn't ignore the profound animal cruelty inherent in meat production any longer.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)If everyone could actually see what goes on with animal slaughter, I am certain that many, many more people would be vegetarians.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Warpy
(111,245 posts)and turn grazing lands back into what they were supposed to be, grasslands populated by bison.
Until it becomes widely available, I'll eat 100% grass fed beef the once a year I do eat it.
I just hope they do the same for fish and fowl.
MADem
(135,425 posts)If it tasted the same, I'd eat it.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)You have a rare talent for using this medium well.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)to get cloned rare fauxlet mignon and pseudo-loin if it tasted the same!
in most cases that is exactly the same thing - there is very little physiological difference between a bison and a cow and they can both be managed (or mismanaged) in the same ways.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)As a kid, visiting my grandparents in Mayor Daley's neighborhood was a treat--except for that.
packman
(16,296 posts)Seems like it's almost mandatory when talking about cows:
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)hunter
(38,310 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)There will be a handful of really tasty cows out there have have their DNA completely sequenced and form the basis for mass cloning. Not just mass cloning, but selective mass cloning... of the popular cuts of meat.
They won't mass-clone the whole animal, but the parts we consume. Basically, rows of petri dishes growing steaks, chops, roasts, etc. Some sort of nutrient fluid would be used to grow the meat, and probably use electrical stimulus to exercise the muscle cells into delicious, delicious shape.
The fluid could be created from landscaping or agricultural waste, or whatever. That part will probably be the grossest part.
The carbon footprint should be drastically reduced. And when you went to the store to buy some ribeye, you would be able to pick the name of the cow of a particular breed you wanted. So if you liked ribeyes from "Amy the cow", you'd always be able to buy cloned meat from Amy for your entire life as Amy's DNA is copied a million times a day to make cuts of meat.
Same for other animals, although with the importance that many cultures place on beef and the high carbon footprint of cows, I think cattle will be first.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)imagine "home grown veal" in your veal scallopini.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Can't wait. No more gristle, no more rubbery veins, just pure, tender muscle tissue, sans animal.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Lots of land would be freed up, hopefully for nature restoration and not golf courses.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)for my taste.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)cannot be measured but by bone and blood.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)It's the new old cure for MRSA!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)and you can make him a drone working in a factory until he drops
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Grow me some perfect Dinosaur Bones AKA beef back ribs. Not those sissy little baby back ribs, or beef short ribs, but good FOOT-LONG beef ribs.
Firin' up the smoker in anticipation.
S_B_Jackson
(906 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)People are tasty!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Picnics must be fun.
"What does everybody want??"
"BRAAAAAAAINSSSS!!"
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Captain Spaulding Tasty Fried Chicken:
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)then you shouldn't have a problem.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)but I have no objections up to and including "it's not natural". If it tastes like, cooks like, and has the textures and mouth feel of a rare filet mignon?
Sign me the hell up!
And do something about the Alaskan King Crab Legs. Make a big ol' batch of those for me to test, too. And raw oysters.
Oh hell, I'll try them all!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Do it for leg of lamb, too.
Even better, create Alaskan King Crab leg meat by the ton, and I will be in heaven on Earth.
Signed,
Unrepentant Seafood and red meat lover.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)The almost complete abandonment of questions of economic justice by the Left is truly astonishing to me.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Is cloned tissue supposed to be bad? Heck, I'd pay a premium for it. As I said above, no gristle, no connective tissue, no blood vessels. No worries about it eating pesticide on forage or drinking fracking fluids in the water table. Plus, of course, the ecological benefits from raising far fewer cattle - lots less methane, no antibiotic feed, no soil erosion all spring immediately to mind, and I'm sure there are plenty of other benefits. Where's the justice in continuing to murder other animals for food when you no longer have to to get meat?
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)the taste of the meat.
Nevertheless, I recognize the ideological basis for your choice of terminology - as all use of language supports a political ideology. I am an unapologetic carnivore, and foodie, and you sound like someone who does not eat meat by following arguments for vegetarianism.
I support the right of farmers and ranchers to make an honest living raising food. I support the right of everyone to have access to healthy food. I'll wait for the culinary professionals to determine whether or not cloned meat deserves a place on the table in fine restaurants. The health consequences of eating cloned meat will take up to 20-50 years to be determined, so I plan to let others volunteer to be the guinea pigs for this science experiment.
You don't wish to discuss how this cloned meat is being developed to feed the proletariat, nor how this will affect small farmers and ranchers ability to earn a decent living. I do.
I wish you "bon appetit" on your cloned meat.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)less than ethical choice on my part. And guess who raises most of the vegetables I eat? Farmers. I do garden myself, but don't raise nearly enough to feed myself year round. And I think it would be far healthier for most Americans to eat less meat than they do currently.
How will this affect small farmers? It will incentivize them to grow more vegetables, and raise fewer cattle.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)I refuse the framing that tells me that as a human, I am unethical if I eat meat. It is no more unethical for me to eat meat than it is for a wolf or a lion - we are carnivores.
I think your argument about ranchers switching to raising vegetable is a bit over-simplified and you haven't discussed that cloned meat is being developed to feed minimum wage earners - and whether or not that is acceptable since the 1% have no intention of raising salaries so that everyone has access to good quality food.
Cheers
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Check out your teeth in a mirror some time. You've got more teeth adapted to eating veggies than you do teeth adapted to eating meat. Your teeth are a lot closer to those of a horse than those of a shark or lion or wolf.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Or Elsie, and that's not a threat, it's a premise!!
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Isn't it fascinating how we think we need to eat the flesh of animals? We don't; but we do crave it and want it.
So we justify this craving by categorizing animals; some are pets and we don't eat them, and we're not cruel to them. But then there are others who are bred and slaughtered on a massive scale for the sole purpose of satisfying human taste buds. How can we do that?
I guess cloned meat will save a lot of animals, but it's also really strange.
Kali
(55,007 posts)that this could be a possible dietary choice.
gives me the willies, personally, but I don't have a problem with other people buying and eating it if that is what they want to do.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Considering how harmful raising cattle is for the environment - According to the UN, they are responsible for 18% of greenhouse gases and a major cause of deforestation - I think it's nice that we are looking into alternatives.
Though it sets up a rather interesting potential conflict - Can this food be considered natural or organic? And, what about those with vegan or vegetarian diets? They are both based on a desire to live a lifestyle that doesn't harm animals, and direct cloning of meat doesn't actually harm them. All that cloning would require is a small peice of meat, which can easily be obtained without having to kill the animal.
Exception for dietary vegans ofc, this advancement isn't going to be of much benefit to them, but the bulk of vegans are comprised of those with moral, political, or environmental concerns. Cloned meat resolves most of the moral issues - Those who disagree with animals being killed for human benefit - and directly addresses environmental concerns - Switching over to cloned meat would lead to a reduction of cattle herds over time, and the reduction of cattle herds and their impact would be even quicker should this group come out in support of cloned meats.
Political is up in the air, though it's heavily influenced by moral or environmental groups.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)That would make for some convoluted rabbinical debates, I think.
Impact on the environment is an interesting question. For sure we could use relief from the waste that cattle produce. It would be great to think of the cattle and pork populations falling to new lows, something manageable to the air and water surrounding their pens.
I know -- it's really unnatural. But then, so is a lot of our food.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)nt
Lancero
(3,003 posts)By the most restrictive definitions, a lot of food that is considered 'natural' isn't. Anything that is the result of directed and focused crossbreeding wouldn't be because it didn't occur naturally, it was directly influenced by human hands.
The article focuses on cattle, though you are right that it could apply to quite a few foodstock.
Though it does bring another question - What happens to the animals after we no longer require them? Their populations have grown so large because we encourage their growth and protect them from their natural predators, but what will happen to the species when we no longer have a need to grow or protect their populations? Especially the species that were selectively bred with traits beneficial for production but would actually harm them in the wild?
Natures course would be for these species to die out, to go extinct, but I'd figure that quite a few people would disagree with this outcome.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)...to get used to the idea, during which the population of food-animals can be consumed while ranchers breed fewer of them. I can see a considerable amount of resistance coming from ranchers, though.
Food animals will never become extinct, though. We've coexisted with them for tens of thousands of years, and some people will always want to eat the real deal and will be willing to pay a premium for the pleasure.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)I mean...why go through all that trouble just to replicate the whole cow?
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)This thread has been hilarious.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)probably start to use the slaughterhouse scrap meat for pet food again.
A lot less contamination recalls and sickness from meat grown in a lab. Unless the tech sneezes in the dish and we grow human 'meat' as lab accident
Maybe? the spent dairy cows that traditionally suffer an end of life to become Americas cheapest ground beef...could be humanely euthanized when their decade + of milking/calving is over.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)actually one day be a reality (for meat at least).
In my best Jean-Luc Picard voice:
"Computer! A New York strip, medium well!"