General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy America’s obsession with STEM education is dangerous
Why Americas obsession with STEM education is dangerousBy Fareed Zakaria at the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-stem-wont-make-us-successful/2015/03/26/5f4604f2-d2a5-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html?tid=sm_fb
"SNIP...............
If Americans are united in any conviction these days, it is that we urgently need to shift the countrys education toward the teaching of specific, technical skills. Every month, it seems, we hear about our childrens bad test scores in math and science and about new initiatives from companies, universities or foundations to expand STEM courses (science, technology, engineering and math) and deemphasize the humanities. From President Obama on down, public officials have cautioned against pursuing degrees like art history, which are seen as expensive luxuries in todays world. Republicans want to go several steps further and defund these kinds of majors. Is it a vital interest of the state to have more anthropologists? asked Floridas Gov. Rick Scott. I dont think so. Americas last bipartisan cause is this: A liberal education is irrelevant, and technical training is the new path forward. It is the only way, we are told, to ensure that Americans survive in an age defined by technology and shaped by global competition. The stakes could not be higher.
This dismissal of broad-based learning, however, comes from a fundamental misreading of the facts and puts America on a dangerously narrow path for the future. The United States has led the world in economic dynamism, innovation and entrepreneurship thanks to exactly the kind of teaching we are now told to defenestrate. A broad general education helps foster critical thinking and creativity. Exposure to a variety of fields produces synergy and cross fertilization. Yes, science and technology are crucial components of this education, but so are English and philosophy. When unveiling a new edition of the iPad, Steve Jobs explained that its in Apples DNA that technology alone is not enough that its technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.
Innovation is not simply a technical matter but rather one of understanding how people and societies work, what they need and want. America will not dominate the 21st century by making cheaper computer chips but instead by constantly reimagining how computers and other new technologies interact with human beings.
For most of its history, the United States was unique in offering a well-rounded education. In their comprehensive study, The Race Between Education and Technology, Harvards Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz point out that in the 19th century, countries like Britain, France and Germany educated only a few and put them through narrow programs designed to impart only the skills crucial to their professions. America, by contrast, provided mass general education because people were not rooted in specific locations with long-established trades that offered the only paths forward for young men. And the American economy historically changed so quickly that the nature of work and the requirements for success tended to shift from one generation to the next. People didnt want to lock themselves into one professional guild or learn one specific skill for life.
...............SNIP"
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)We have too many computer/software engineers and not enough mechanical/electrical engineers. Whatever is built in the virtual world is often trivially portable and can move from nation to nation in a very short period of time. Infrastructure assets, on the other hand, can't be, and that's where I believe long-term competitive advantage will lie. You can ship computers anywhere you have electricity, but you can't ship a road, a port, a bridge, or a power plant.
forsaken mortal
(112 posts)Why couldn't you hire offshore engineers to design the infrastructure you speak of? Seems the only people that have to be on site are the actual builders, and those usually aren't engineers but craftsman, machine operators, and the like. I do believe there needs to be more emphasis put on the trades.