Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsACLU: Federal Court Rules for Indian Families in ACLU Lawsuit
Full release at: https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/federal-court-rules-indian-families-aclu-lawsuit
RAPID CITY, S.D. In a sweeping victory for Indian families, a federal court has ordered South Dakota officials to stop violating the rights of Indian parents and tribes in state child custody proceedings on several grounds.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and Rapid City attorney Dana Hanna on behalf of two South Dakota Indian tribes the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Indian parents who suffered the loss of their children at the hands of the state.
The lawsuit in part charges that Indian children are being removed from their homes in hearings that lasted as little as 60 seconds, and that parents have no chance to present evidence. In a 45-page ruling issued late yesterday, Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken wrote that "Indian children, parents and tribes deserve better," agreed with all seven of the ACLU's claims, and ordered the state to:
Provide parents with adequate notice prior to emergency removal hearings
Allow parents to testify at those hearings and present evidence
Appoint attorneys to assist parents in these removal proceedings
Allow parents to cross-examine the states witnesses in the hearings
Require state courts to base their decisions on evidence presented during these hearings.
The court also found that the state violated the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a federal law designed to ensure the security and integrity of Indian tribes and families. The law is intended "to curb the alarmingly high rate of removal of Indian children from Indian parents."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 625 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ACLU: Federal Court Rules for Indian Families in ACLU Lawsuit (Original Post)
Algernon Moncrieff
Mar 2015
OP
It is simply appalling what the leaders of this country have done to the original inhabitants of
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#4
mopinko
(70,077 posts)1. the first nations need real self rule, not just
permission to sell cigarettes and build casinos.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)2. Agree!
mopinko
(70,077 posts)3. we are friends w several bands of first nations people.
i cant believe the lack of self sufficiency. the poverty. it is just appalling.
at least they seem to have won one in wisconsin. last i heard this mine is not going forward. it would have destroyed a first nation tribe's land, including their traditional rice crop.
http://www.propublica.org/article/in-wisconsin-dark-money-got-a-mining-company-what-it-wanted
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)4. It is simply appalling what the leaders of this country have done to the original inhabitants of
this land. It makes me so sad the oppression still continues.
Rex
(65,616 posts)5. "Indian children, parents and tribes deserve better,"
IS the understatement of several centuries.