General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow the Media Misrepresent Obama’s “Fast Track” “Secret” International Trade Deals
5/7/2015
Both conservative and liberal news media misrepresent U.S. President Barack Obamas proposed international trade-deals as if they were about only such things as lowering tariffs and reducing national trade-protectionism which are relatively minor surface-features of these huge proposed treaties: TTIP with Europe, TPP with Asia, and TISA (Trade in Services Agreement). All of these proposed Obama trade-deals are actually about transferring to panels of international corporations the powers that currently reside in the various individual nations regulatory and legal authorities i.e., that reside in the democratic governments that are accountable to the population that elected them instead of to the few global billionaires who control the international corporations.
...For example, if you will google-seach in one-and-the-same search the two phrases together fast track was passed bill was defeated you will get the following: No results found for fast track was passed bill was defeated.
The reason why this is the case is laid out in the book by Public Citizen, The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority. It explains that Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was created by President Nixon in order to get around something: to get around the U.S. Constitutions having placed Americas treaty-making authority in a balance-of-powers framework with Congress, something that the Constitution did in order to prevent the emergence of dictatorship by excessive power in the hands of the federal Executive, the President (which dictatorship was Nixons goal to achieve.
Only 16 times since Nixon was in the White House has his Fast-Track TPA been applied, and yet hundreds of free-trade agreements have passed Congress without any need for (or application of) Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority during that time. How and why has this been so, and why does the public not know these crucially important things?
TPA, or Fast Track, is the device that is used only when a President wants to ram through Congress a trade-deal that would never be able to pass Congress under the traditional, and fully Constitutional, method, because these are the few trade-deals that have provisions in them that, for the typical member of Congress, would cause him or her to lose the congressional seat if he or she didnt at least try to get the bill amended before it was passed. In other words: only fascistic, or outrageously pro mega-corporate, trade deals, need TPA in order for them to pass Congress. Thats why Nixon initiated TPA. It works as he intended it would.
In Congress, to vote for TPA is to vote for the trade-deal thats about to be fast-tracked; and to vote against TPA is to vote against that trade-deal....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-tpp-and-ttip-how-the-media-misrepresent-fast-track-secret-international-trade-deals/5447839
djean111
(14,255 posts)Only 16 times since Nixon was in the White House has his Fast-Track TPA been applied, and yet hundreds of free-trade agreements have passed Congress without any need for (or application of) Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority during that time. How and why has this been so, and why does the public not know these crucially important things?
TPA, or Fast Track, is the device that is used only when a President wants to ram through Congress a trade-deal that would never be able to pass Congress under the traditional, and fully Constitutional, method, because these are the few trade-deals that have provisions in them that, for the typical member of Congress, would cause him or her to lose the congressional seat if he or she didnt at least try to get the bill amended before it was passed. In other words: only fascistic, or outrageously pro mega-corporate, trade deals, need TPA in order for them to pass Congress. Thats why Nixon initiated TPA. It works as he intended it would.
Fast Track just lets the president ram through corporate deals - this is NOT about countries, it is about corporate rules over countries - and enables Congress to cover its ass at home.
Why not let the few chapters that are actually about trade stand on their own? No, most of the TPP - and TTIP, I believe, judging from the anger in the EU - is about corporate power. It is almost like we are being told that everything - every law, every rule, every regulation - has to do with trade, and, as such, shoud be decided by corporations. That, IMO, is what is being handed to corporations - globally - on a silver platter.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Well said.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)-- so much more than more popular and good liberal causes.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)The panel of 3 arbiters is not run by corporations. In fact, each side picks one, and agrees on the third. Often they are law professors, not corporate attornies.
Countries agree to the ISDS because it attracts badly needed foreign investment.
Heck, the tribunals are run under UN and WTO auspices.
But, ooooooh, they are so evil.
djean111
(14,255 posts)People in the EU are also protesting about ISDS - do you spend time telling them they are wrong, too - or do you actually think that the same small group of people is just protesting all over the world. IMO, the ISDS is designed to have a tighter grip on everything.
Attracts badly needed foreign investment? Gives away countries to global corporations, is more like it. Makes any sort of law or rule or regulation moot, is more like reality. Takes the gamble out of investing, actually - corporations will make a profit one way or another, now. Profit from fracking, or profit from a settlement because a country does not allow fracking. What a deal!
Most likely all of this back and forth about the TPP is moot, the money has changed hands. All I can do personally is never vote for anyone who supports it. I am puzzled by the doggedness here, as if anyone really needed message boards to be all okay with the TPP. Gloating would be more honest.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)here and there who will protest just about anything.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Kinda funny, in a way, to see arguments for the TPP/TTIP devolve to attempting to marginalize the opposition and and belittling sources.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)UN lawyer says tactics used by multinationals in courts outside of public jurisdiction would undermine democracy and law
http://www.theguardian.com/global/2015/may/04/ttip-united-nations-human-right-secret-courts-multinationals
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Dave Johnson~
intellectual property rights like patents and copyrights,
government procurement like Buy American which would be banned,
investment and land use,
service-sector regulation,
food and product safety,
corporate competition,
labor,
even environmental standards.
Leaks show that TPP even limits government regulation of financial services!
Dean Baker explains that non-trade items like patents in an agreement like TPP can have a huge effect on us by dramatically increasing prices of items like pharmaceuticals, in Political Corruption and the Free Trade Racket,
Tariffs and quotas might raise the price of various items by 20 or 30 percent. By contrast, patent and copyright protection is likely to raise the price of protected items 2,000 percent or even 20,000 percent above the free market price. Drugs that would sell for a few dollars per prescription in a free market would sell for hundreds or even thousands of dollars when the government gives a drug company a patent monopoly....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/secret-negotiations-the-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp-a-corporate-takeover/5335348
This is another way the media, owned by the corporations who are writing the TPP, has failed US. This should be front page news.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... to overrule the laws elected representatives of We the People NOT be the most undemocratic piece of shit idea ever rammed down our throat?
Are you fucking kidding?
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Arbitration is used all the time.
But the ultimate fact is, countries are happy to sign these agreements with UN, WTO arbitration rules. It attracts trade and investment in their country.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Fuck the WTO and all of it's neocon and neoliberal scumbag grifters.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)lifestyle, assuming we were lucky.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)That's biggest crock I've ever read.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)The all-conspiracy-all-the-time outlook sometimes produces ridiculous conclusions like Dr. Zeuse here:
However, mainly, investigative journalism ignores the biggest scandal of all, which is the corruption thats rampant in our free press. This is a news-beat thats simply too hot to touch. Its ignored even by both the liberal (fair.org and mediamatters.org) and the conservative (aim.org andmrc.org) media-watchdog organizations. Its journalisms orphan, because journalism is owned by the aristocracy, and no aristocrats want it to become honest. Aristocrats instead want honest journalists to become fired. Journalists just want to keep their jobs.
If he's trying to claim that the US press is some kind of faithful stenographer of the President's position, on TPP or anything else, he's sadly mistaken.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Its so hard to only post a portion of an article when the entire article is spot on & everyone should read.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)The parts where Zeuse isn't quoting his own blog or whatever RINF is. Not exactly top grade material. Ditto Citizen Watch, also generously quoted.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)That sounds pretty accurate to me.
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Damn Nixon, anyway! And anyone who follows in his footsteps.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)It's deeply discouraging that that will never happen.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Elizabeth Warren has warned leery Democrats that a fast-track trade bill could undo U.S. laws such as the Dodd-Frank banking regulations later. A number of constitutional scholars and other legal experts say shes right. In her quarrel with President Barack Obama over trade legislation, Elizabeth Warren has got the law on her side.
The Massachusetts senator has warned fellow Democrats that a fast-track trade bill now in Congress could undo U.S. laws such as the Dodd-Frank banking regulations later. A number of constitutional scholars and other legal experts say shes right.
The reason: An arcane trade-bill provision that would make it easier for a future president and Congress to undercut existing statutes, even ones with little to do with trade....
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)If only our representatives would read it. They're too busy counting the $$$ they'll get if passed for the corporations paying them off to care, I imagine. And republicans are now bragging they have the votes in both the senate & the house to get 'er done.
It's beyond frustrating.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That accounts for about 99% of the swiftboat crowd.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)So there's that, globalresearch.ca .
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)And by creepy I mean exploitative. Not at all surprised to see them cited here.