Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTHE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF BEING “TOUGH ON CRIME”
Were in this exciting moment where weve had 40 years of being tough on crime, and weve finally come to recognize that it really hasnt worked very well, says sociologist Alice Goffman bluntly. Scientists have shown in the past few years that the relationship between incarceration and crime is basically zip. The crime rate goes up and down, incarceration just continues to grow. Its not a good way of fighting crime.
When it comes to talking about jail, Goffman, a teeny tiny wisp of a woman with wide eyes and an open smile, does not mince her words. Sitting forward on a sofa in the Vancouver Convention Center, the day before she is due to give a TED Talk on the problem of using incarceration as a one-size-fits-all solution to crime, she is hopped up at what she sees as the injustice of it all. And she has seen it. As an ethnographer, she lived and breathed with the people in one particular neighborhood of Philadelphia for over a decade, young black men and their families who cannot escape a snakes-and-ladder system that seems like it has been designed to present them with one snake after another.
?w=770&h=564
Incarceration is targeted at poor African-American and Latino communities, she says. So what you have is not just young people going to prison and returning home, but people dealing with court fees, dealing with probation regulations, dealing with parole, living in halfway houses, on house arrest, going to court date after court date. Its a very corrosive system thats way bigger than just locking people up and returning them home with criminal records. It creates this culture of fear and suspicion where young people are looking over their shoulder, wondering when the police are going to come, wondering where theyre going to be seized or who around them is helping the police.
Young people like Tim, who was placed on probation because his brother, Chuck, drove him to school in a car that it transpired had been stolen in California. Tim was charged with being accessory to receiving stolen property and placed on three years of probation. He was eleven years old. And this is the point where Chuck starts teaching him how to run from the police, says Goffman.
http://ideas.ted.com/the-unintended-consequences-of-being-tough-on-crime/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 885 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF BEING “TOUGH ON CRIME” (Original Post)
Katashi_itto
May 2015
OP
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)1. Disgraceful, counter productive..sickening. n/t
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)2. it's now a cash cow for politically connected people
Like for profit health insurance, charter schools, nclb and its evil spawn rttb, and the war on drugs, the rich are getting richer from it, so it will never go away.