General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGun control will end up just like the drug war, almost exclusively aimed at minorities and the poor
Meanwhile wealthy white males will remain coked up, heavily armed and completely unpunished.
The brutality and racism problems with the police will have to be fixed before handing them yet another tool to wield against the population or we all know what portion of the population is going to get that tool wielded against them most often and most brutally.
Twenty years from now all of the Very Serious People will be shocked, shocked that the result of gun control is many more minorities in private prisons on long sentences that rack up big profits for the corporations they work for at slave wages while gun ownership among wealthy whites has soared. We had no idea! We never intended! Very Serious People would never do something like that intentionally for mere personal gain! No one could possibly have predicted!
I expect if it was explained slowly enough even Doug Feith could understand.
4now
(1,596 posts)To do nothing.
Response to Fumesucker (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
daleanime
(17,796 posts)is the same as disarming. Have a lovely evening.
Response to daleanime (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The ONLY time firearm-carry police should be on a scene is when a suspect is brandishing a firearm or has already fired shots.
LAGC
(5,330 posts)They are primarily a device to keep the lower-classes in their places, subservient and docile against all the mounting economic injustices levied against them.
There's a reason why the most prominent, outspoken key backers of gun control in this country are billionaires like Bloomberg and Gates. They've seen the writing on the wall. And the last thing they need is an armed populace of "have nots" pissed off and angry while the "haves" laugh all the way to the bank.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)It's more important to be seen doing something. Don't worry about actually doing anything and, even if you actually do something, don't worry about the facts! Those are just details!
daleanime
(17,796 posts)more important, then the lives lost.
Have a lovely evening.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Because big demand and no supply will create it. And of course the smugglers of guns will be well armed themselves. And although gun registration and regulation is pathetically low now, it would be zero then. The gun banners obviously haven't thought this through.
JI7
(89,247 posts)has helped .
JI7
(89,247 posts)in fact they are often more assumed to be armed anyways and are shot . like tamir rice . and then the cops justify it by claiming they were armed.
only white people like bundy are able to fight off law enforcement by being armed.
Response to JI7 (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JI7
(89,247 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Why would you expect different results when you leave the same enforcers in charge of guns as are in charge of all the other laws?
And of course the gun laws will have to be made more strict and more punitive because that's the way America rolls.
JI7
(89,247 posts)you need to do something about racism .
black people are always stopped in their cars for alleged traffic violations or other things . your solution seems to be we shouldn't have traffic laws because of this instead of dealing with the actual issue .
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The system was *designed* the way it is, it didn't get that way by accident.
JI7
(89,247 posts)it's easy to blame the "system" as if there is some higher power when in reality people are just assholes .
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Cannabis was nicknamed marijuana so it could be demonized as a "Mexican" drug while for blacks it was cocaine that was supposed to impart superhuman physical powers.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)A gun, if used in the ways we don't care for, is openly used. Think about it. Your claim is that 'the rich' would be allowed to shoot the place up all the time? Really?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Case in point: the officers indicted in Baltimore.
I think what we're dealing with here is power that has become insulated because it has previously been allowed to grow unchallenged. In other words -- bullies.
Bundy didn't escape because he was white, he escaped because they were willing to challenge the bullies. And yes, the same holds true for people of color, i.e. the Huey P. Newton Gun Club --
Paladin
(28,252 posts)Feel free to prove me wrong.
madville
(7,408 posts)Specifically Black males against other black males, ages 18-24 per current DOJ statistics. If more strict gun regulations were enacted that group would receive the most attention from law enforcement since that is where most gun violence occurs thanks to the war on drugs.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I support some common sense gun controls like background checks and stuff. But apparently there are some extremists who do want a new war on guns. It's just going to target poor people and minorities.
And also create a huge new gang problem as gangs step in to control the black market, just like with drugs.