Just saw the new NBC/Wallstreet Journey poll and

[bigdarryl]

Hillary is getting 92% of the democrats who support her.So much for Bernie Sanders is gaining on Hillary

[upaloopa]

1. Shhhhhhh! You might put a damper on the burn

[cherokeeprogressive]

2. Proud to count myself among the 8%.

[HooptieWagon]

3. Bernie will continue to chip away.

[HERVEPA]

4. Not very good. I would think she should get 100% of the Democrats who support her.

[hrmjustin]

6. No Democratic Nominee has ever gotten 100 percent in recent history.

[HERVEPA]

7. No Democrcrat has ever gotten 100% support from those who support him or her?

What is your definition of support?

[hrmjustin]

8. I am talking general election.

No Dem or Gop nominee has ever won 100 percent.

They usually get between 90 to 94 percent.

[HERVEPA]

9. Thanks for the clarification

[edgineered]

16. Love is blind - and those lovers cannot see the statement from the words. nt

[Warpy]

29. Heh, no kidding

I noticed that wording, too.

[hrmjustin]

5. But but they said that Sanders has the big Mo.

They assured me!

[HERVEPA]

10. Why do you feel the need to mock Sanders abd his supporters.

I'm not out there mocking Hillary for anything.

[hrmjustin]

12. I feel so ashamed.

[HERVEPA]

21. And you're hosting in prayer and religion. Wow!

[hrmjustin]

22. What are you talking about?

[HERVEPA]

23. I'm talking about the obnoxious posts while

Hosting

New York
Prayer Circle
Hillary Clinton
Interfaith Group

[hrmjustin]

24. What does my comment have to do with my faith or my hosting?

[HERVEPA]

26. Never mind. Hopeless.

[hrmjustin]

27. I think you are describing yourself.

Good bye!

[MFrohike]

11. Wallstreet Journey?

Was it entitled "Don't Stop Believin?"



Sorry, couldn't resist.

[yuiyoshida]

13. Wallstreet Journal?

Well we all know what Wall Street thinks of Bernie. And as for NBC... I am sure the major networks all have their chosen candidates already.

[Art_from_Ark]

14. The Wall Street Journey-- er, Journal

is one of Rupert Murdoch's rags. Not much better than fishwrap or bird cage liner these days.

[yuiyoshida]

15. hahaha...

pfft..well there ya go! XD

[leftofcool]

18. All polls showing Hillary ahead are viewed this way.

[Gothmog]

19. Those are some strong polling numbers

[hay rick]

20. Wonder what the polls will look like after the first couple of primaries.

Until then I expect to hear about a lot of unhatched chickens.

[alcibiades_mystery]

25. Heh heh heh

[MrMickeysMom]

28. The last time numbers were similar was in 2007 before Barack Obama emerged as a candidate...

I find it interesting that this poll is flanked by the WSJ as a strong candidate is emerging now.

I'd also think that the numbers would be interesting IF there WERE large numbers of primary voters showing up at the polls.

This means the work goes on to get the registration out and follow up with getting the vote out. I don't discount that Sanders is emerging at a rate unseen before, and that worries a lot of people on Wall Street.

[stevenleser]

30. Nope, at this time in 2007 Obama was only 14-16 points behind, and he barely pulled it out

And needed help from two states, including Florida, misbehaving such that their delegates were not counted until after Obama had clinched the nomination.

[MrMickeysMom]

32. That wasn't the point...

He (Barack Obama) was emerging as a strong candidate, and regardless of how or who helped him, he pulled it off. Obama couldn't possibly be the candidate Bernie Sanders is. Perhaps you have yet to realize it, or maybe you'd just prefer to listen to what worked then, so the same outcome is predictable now. I beg to differ. There are a lot of turning points now. Remember when the last economic bubble burst?

We are seeing such a strong candidate who connects with the real middle and working class emerging like no one has in a long, long time (FDR). It is not a coincidence that the Wall Street Journal is showing this poll. We are in big trouble and the ideas of the last election are not going to work for a candidate running against Bernie Sanders.

[Betty Karlson]

35. Good points.

But the FDR voters are no as monolythic a voters bloc as they once were. The demographic composition of the USA has changed significantly since those days.

[Cha]

31. mahalo bd

[CTBlueboy]

33. mock now cry later

The appointed one and her supporters still didn't learn their lesson from 08 campaign

I'm just gonna sit back and wait for those debates

Underdogs always win the battle

[DiverDave]

34. Uh-Huh...and the owners of nbc and wsj want you to believe it

I guess you do.
They lie to advance their own agenda.

[wyldwolf]

36. what you're seeing is a certain segment of the Democratic party solidify around Sanders

It's real support, for sure, but that segment is only so big. We've seen it with Bill Bradley in 2000, for example. Bradley supporters crowed early on how they were going to knock Gore off.