Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 07:07 PM Sep 2015

Tom Brady is Lucky That He is A Union Member

Whether or not you are a Patriots' Fan or you hate the fact that they win all the time, you have to admit that the Brady Deflategate saga was quite a lesson to many people on the advantages of being in a union and working under a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA).

Take, for instance, the players involved with "Bountygate". The New Orleans players that were suspended had all of their punishments dramatically reduced, or, in some cases, completely vacated. The coach, Shawn Payton, worked for management and was, in essence, an employee at will. He had no recourse because he had no employee rights. Therefore, he lost a full year of work, his salary and a hefty fine.

This should be a lesson to everyone in the work-place. Being a union member and working under a CBA, you can only be disciplined for "Just Cause" and not because someone in management thinks you are "generally aware" of another's misconduct, if the misconduct isn't even proven to have taken place in the first instance.

So, whether you work for $20 million a year or $20 thousand a year, only unions give you rights in the work-place.

51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Brady is Lucky That He is A Union Member (Original Post) louis c Sep 2015 OP
1+ riversedge Sep 2015 #1
Unions are such a no brainer. Too bad so many have no brains randys1 Sep 2015 #2
Your last sentence Dyedinthewoolliberal Sep 2015 #3
This Is A Teachable Moment And The Unions And Union Supporters Need To..... global1 Sep 2015 #4
Except their union is frankly really crappy mythology Sep 2015 #5
Imagine Krytan11c Sep 2015 #8
This proves my adege, "a bad union is better than no union at all". louis c Sep 2015 #11
The two locker room guys had no union. Result they were terminated by the Patriots. Johonny Sep 2015 #6
Another Framegate lie... joeybee12 Sep 2015 #15
Try to picket an NFL game and see if they cross the line, not a real Union! Nt Logical Sep 2015 #7
This has nothing to do with the union. former9thward Sep 2015 #9
I'm sorry that you are mistaken louis c Sep 2015 #10
I sorry this is what you do for a living. former9thward Sep 2015 #12
Again louis c Sep 2015 #13
Shawn Payton is not in the same class as Brady. former9thward Sep 2015 #14
He has the same type of contract louis c Sep 2015 #16
He has th same type of contract because of the union. former9thward Sep 2015 #17
If there was not a union, he would not have recourse to arbitration louis c Sep 2015 #18
I doubt you even watch football. former9thward Sep 2015 #21
You're assuming Brady could have negotiated for that. ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #19
The Union is not for players of Brady's ability. former9thward Sep 2015 #20
I get the impression from your (wrong) arguments in this thread Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #22
No, I think he is saying 1939 Sep 2015 #23
Please read this louis c Sep 2015 #35
I am not surprised that you get wrong impressions. former9thward Sep 2015 #25
Well let's see, when I asserted correctly that the republicans Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #27
Another tactic -- derailing threads. former9thward Sep 2015 #28
Oh I'll be around. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #29
After you read this........... louis c Sep 2015 #31
A blog by a no name blogger. former9thward Sep 2015 #32
NBC sports is no "no name blog"? louis c Sep 2015 #33
Read. It helps. former9thward Sep 2015 #36
You need a labor education louis c Sep 2015 #39
LOL former9thward Sep 2015 #42
The top tier coaches 1939 Sep 2015 #47
I thought you seemed a little too rightward leaning for this site louis c Sep 2015 #34
Now, personal attacks. former9thward Sep 2015 #37
You may be right ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #24
The NFLPA was recognized in 1968. former9thward Sep 2015 #26
Only unions protect workers' rights louis c Sep 2015 #38
Sorry I (and so many others) do not meet your standards. former9thward Sep 2015 #40
At least you said you're sorry louis c Sep 2015 #44
And I am disappointed in your personal attacks on me. former9thward Sep 2015 #45
kingforalldems is correct louis c Sep 2015 #41
The key word being "NOT" tenderfoot Sep 2015 #43
Any you are not much of a labor person. former9thward Sep 2015 #46
Are you kidding me? louis c Sep 2015 #48
Feel like an idiot yet? louis c Sep 2015 #50
+1000 smirkymonkey Sep 2015 #51
Yup. Agschmid Sep 2015 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #49

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,566 posts)
3. Your last sentence
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 07:32 PM
Sep 2015

is an excellent way to sum up why unions are important. I'm stealing it!
But I will say thanks first!

global1

(25,241 posts)
4. This Is A Teachable Moment And The Unions And Union Supporters Need To.....
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 08:58 PM
Sep 2015

take advantage of it and make it an example. A lot of people relate to football. What a better way to couple the two - football players and the value of a union - and relate that to every worker.

Hear that Unions - don't squander this opportunity.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
5. Except their union is frankly really crappy
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:59 PM
Sep 2015

They have only very recently begun to secure any sort of benefits for retirees (and even that required retired permanently injured players to initiate the lawsuits), they don't have guaranteed contracts and they support a system that pays the handful of players who get hit the least, the most money and the players who are at the most risk for life long injuries lesser amounts.

The NFLPA also fought tooth and nail against drug testing and just defended a player who cheated other members of the union. If my "representatives" spent a bunch of time and money defending somebody who cheated me out of a fair shot, I'd be pissed off. It is utterly silly to assume that Brady and "The Deflator" only took the air out of the balls in one game.

The NFLPA is really not an example of a good union. It has let down both retired players and current players (or at least the current players who are not drug users or cheats).

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
8. Imagine
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:27 AM
Sep 2015

Imagine you work in a union job and per your collective bargaining there are set penalties for being late to work. 1-15 minutes= a warning. So one day you're late for work and your company decides to ignore the collective bargaining and suspend you for 2 weeks. It would be your unions job to fight for you.
The cba between the nfl and nflpa had set punishments for equipment infractions, a $25,000 fine. All of a sudden Tom Brady violates equipment policy and he's suspended 4 games. Damn right his union fought for him.
I agree that the nflpa could be much stronger, but I find no fault with their handling of Tom Brady's case.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
11. This proves my adege, "a bad union is better than no union at all".
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 07:06 AM
Sep 2015

Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:29 PM - Edit history (1)

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) can help you fix a bad or corrupt union.

The NLRB can step in and protect you if the union doesn't do its job in protecting your rights. You have recourse, even in a bad union, and you can correct it through the election process.

If you have no union, you are at the mercy of the employer, period.

Johonny

(20,833 posts)
6. The two locker room guys had no union. Result they were terminated by the Patriots.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 11:54 PM
Sep 2015

Poor people with no union lost their jobs in deflategate. Rich guy with union kept job and money. It pays to have a union.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
15. Another Framegate lie...
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 08:08 PM
Sep 2015

The two guys weren't even employees...just game-day employees who worked the Sunday games at Foxboro...in other words, they were employed 8 days a year...season ended, they left...lots of misinformation out that that the haters just ate up.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
9. This has nothing to do with the union.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 01:21 AM
Sep 2015

Brady is one of the top players in the NFL. If there were no union his contract would provide all the protections against arbitrary punishment.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
10. I'm sorry that you are mistaken
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 07:01 AM
Sep 2015

Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:29 PM - Edit history (2)

Without specifying in an individual contract rights only afforded in a Collective Bargaining Agreement, you are essentially an "At Will" employee.

By way of example, as I stated in the OP, each player accused in "Bountgate" had they're punishments reduced or rescinded.

Yet the coach, Sean Payton, is considered a management employee with an individual contract and not covered by the CBA, so he had no recourse, and had to accept the one year suspension without pay and a very hefty fine.

So, as I say, I'm sorry to have to correct you, but arbitration is reserved for union members with a CBA who can only be disciplined "for cause".

This is what I do for a living.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
12. I sorry this is what you do for a living.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:29 PM
Sep 2015

Because you do not understand it. If there was no union Brady would have a personal contract which specified how discipline will be handled. He is a top player so he would be able to get anything in his contract that he wanted and the owner would sign it. Low level players would not be so lucky.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
13. Again
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 07:41 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:30 PM - Edit history (1)

Sean Payton had a personal contract with the same league, under the same conditions.

He had no recourse to arbitration, or even the grievance process. Payton, in Bountygate, had no way to remedy his punishment. All of the Players were remedied with discipline reduction and in two cases, there punishment was vacated and they were paid for their "lost time" (completely financially compensated). All as a result of the Collective Bargaining Agreement which only affords union members that remedy.

How is it you can't understand that?

As for feeling sorry for what I do for a living, you can feel sorry for the management teams that consistently lose to me in the grievance and arbitration proceedings in Greater Boston. I do very well for a blue collar guy.

The Brady case was a good vehicle to educate the public on the advantages of a union and the work place law it provides.

I'm so sorry you missed that point and that you don't get it

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
16. He has the same type of contract
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 04:07 PM
Sep 2015

as Brady. A direct contract with his secondary employer, the New Orleans Saints.

He can be disciplined by either his primary employer (the NFL) or his secondary employer (the Team), neither of which have union negotiated CBA's for management personal, so Payton has no rights under the primary contract (the NFL).

This is the last time I will respond on this subject. You don't get it and never will.

I have done this work for 20 years and have risen to the top of my profession. I deal with the most accomplished labor lawyers in America.

If you want to find out the facts involving labor law, I suggest you join the closest labor guild so you can have a remedial understanding of the subject.

I'm sure you know a lot about what you do for work. If I were you, I would try to post to subjects you know about and stay away from that which you know nothing about.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
17. He has th same type of contract because of the union.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 04:22 PM
Sep 2015

The WHOLE premise of my comments in this OP was if there was NOT a union. Please get out of this field if you really are in it. You don't know what you are talking about.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
18. If there was not a union, he would not have recourse to arbitration
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:20 PM
Sep 2015

I know, I broke my promise to not respond, but old union habits die hard.

I will stay in this field. I settled a case in which a woman, wrongfully terminated, was returned to work with full seniority, back pay and $60,000 paid in a triple damages suit against the company, and I'm not even a lawyer. I negotiate 3 or 4 days a week Collective Bargaining Agreements at 19 various sites around Greater Boston and mitigated a case just this week, in which a female electrical worker returned to work with a 3 day suspension with pay. As a matter of fact, I am on the negotiating team for the maintenance workers at Gillette stadium for a contract that expires on Dec. 31 of this year. Members can choose an agent to represent them in the second and third steps of a grievance and I am asked for so often that I have trouble meeting a schedule. So, when you say I should look for another field, it seems that people who really, really do know what they're talking about would heartily disagree with you.

If you can't see the importance of a union, perhaps you are on, and have been on for years, the wrong political site.

I have been criticized before from people who really do know what they're talking about but who support people for public office that wouldn't be welcome here at DU.

And you surely don't know what you are talking about, at least not on this subject.

But, alas, everyone is entitled to an opinion, regardless whether or not is based in knowledge or merit.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
21. I doubt you even watch football.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:46 PM
Sep 2015

If you did you would not be making these comments. Brady could negotiate for arbitration or anything else and he would get it. Teams want him. Its not the other way around. But keep on digging....

ShrimpPoboy

(301 posts)
19. You're assuming Brady could have negotiated for that.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:29 PM
Sep 2015

Did top players have these rights before the CBA?

I honestly don't know. If not, that would be a strong argument for the union--not personal bargaining position--being responsible.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
20. The Union is not for players of Brady's ability.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:42 PM
Sep 2015

It absolutely helps those of mid level or lower level ability. Brady could negotiate for anything he wanted.

Kingofalldems

(38,451 posts)
22. I get the impression from your (wrong) arguments in this thread
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:00 PM
Sep 2015

that you don't like unions very much. Very unbecoming of a Democrat.

1939

(1,683 posts)
23. No, I think he is saying
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:15 PM
Sep 2015

that top players (like CEOs) have the power in contract negotiations to build in protection for themselves.

Board of Directors to CEO: You're fired!

CEO to Board of Directors: Fine, just pay me the gazillions of dollars severance that my contract calls for.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
35. Please read this
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:39 PM
Sep 2015
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/07/21/sean-payton-bounty-suspension-seems-like-10-years-ago/

It says it all. It explains my position, which shouldn't have to be explained on this site.

The biggest problem with Democrats is that they don't know who their friends are.

We can't win without unions and too many Democrats are uninformed or misinformed about the most important political ally we have.

Ou unionr members will take a walk if they feel left out and there is no way we win without them and people like them.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
25. I am not surprised that you get wrong impressions.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:25 PM
Sep 2015

Given all your past replies to me. I said the union helps most players. It does not help Brady. He doesn't need it. I was elected three times to be Chairman of the biggest steelworker union in Chicago and one of the five biggest (at that time) in the U.S. So your post is pretty funny. And that is not news, I have posted many times about my activities there. Since you are the king of all dems only in your mind you don't to judge who is a Democrat and who isn't except in your own mind which is filled with wrong impressions -- and arguments.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
31. After you read this...........
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:03 PM
Sep 2015

I'll accept your apology.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/07/21/sean-payton-bounty-suspension-seems-like-10-years-ago/

<snip>“I certainly can’t speak for Tom,” Payton told Fox Sports Radio, via the New Orleans Times-Picayune. “The comparisons are difficult, because one deals with the players union, and in our case, there’s pretty much no representation outside what the league finds."

<snip 2>Without the legal backing of a union, coaches such as Payton have little choice but to sit back and take it, when it seems everyone else gets their sentences reduced as soon as it leaves Goodell’s courtroom.

Story by NBC Sports, July 21, 2015

I guess that says it all.

Game, set and match.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
32. A blog by a no name blogger.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:09 PM
Sep 2015

Giving the same silly argument as you do. Comparing a coach who 99% of people have never heard of to a top tier player is just ridiculous.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
33. NBC sports is no "no name blog"?
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:16 PM
Sep 2015

and Sean Payton is no "no-name".

Find me a story from any source that backs your position.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
36. Read. It helps.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:40 PM
Sep 2015

I said the blogger is no name. Never heard of him. Sean Payton is a coach. Are you placing him on the same level with Brady? If a team was offered Brady or Payton who would they chose? If you say Payton then you don't watch football. Please give me a source that equates the skills of Brady to Payton in terms of winning football games.

1939

(1,683 posts)
47. The top tier coaches
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 10:44 AM
Sep 2015

Like Jimmie Johnson and Bill Parcells can dictate their contracts. Lesser lights like Payton have their contracts dictated to them.

Top flight rock bands can demand champagne, caviar, and cocaine be provided in their dressing room. Other rock bands do what the bar owner tells them to do.

ShrimpPoboy

(301 posts)
24. You may be right
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:19 PM
Sep 2015

Or ownership could have gotten together and agreed not to let any player have those rights. If that were the case, Brady wouldn't have been able to get it. Again, what were top players getting before the CBA? It's only a few years old. Did Brady negotiate for this before 2011? I don't know and I doubt you do either.

What we do know to be fact is that the arbitration and appeals rights he currently has come from the union negotiated CBA, alternate realities notwithstanding.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
26. The NFLPA was recognized in 1968.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:36 PM
Sep 2015

I am not sure why you are using 2011. That was just the last negotiations. Knowing what players got before 1968 is like doing alternative history. It was a different world back then. Baseball was the #1 sport not the NFL. Now the NFL is #1. Since '68 billions of dollars of TV money has come into the game which has completely changed everything. Owners and players have become wealthy off of it.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
38. Only unions protect workers' rights
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:42 PM
Sep 2015

Voices like yours have weakened the Democratic Party. Our most important ally is Labor. Without it, we lose nearly every national election.

Too many misinformed Democrats think like you and make my job of convincing our members to vote with us that much harder.

You really are a hindrance to our cause.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
40. Sorry I (and so many others) do not meet your standards.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 07:46 PM
Sep 2015

BTW you don't speak for Labor. And you don't speak for Democrats.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
44. At least you said you're sorry
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:29 PM
Sep 2015

and I only speak of you not understanding.

However, the whole Democratic Party could use a lesson in labor history and how important the working middle class is to our success.

We ignore these people at our peril.

Your ignorance on the subject speaks volumes and is an example of the electoral danger we encounter.

Duers are supposed to be the best informed Democrats, so that we can bring this message to those who are not so politically interested.

For having 15,000 posts, I'm surprised and disappointed at you lack of information which leads to your insulting position concerning unions.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
45. And I am disappointed in your personal attacks on me.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:51 PM
Sep 2015

Which is what your posts have degenerated into. You have intentionally tried to distort my position on unions. You did not make a mistake. It was an intentional effort to distort. The posts are there for everyone to read.

And please stop sending me IMs. If you are going to make personal attacks do it out in the open.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
46. Any you are not much of a labor person.
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 01:30 AM
Sep 2015

Despite your lame attempts to say you are. I was part of the struggle to get the UAW recognized at the world's biggest steel foundry in Portland, Or. My role is documented in the recently published book Radicals in the Rose City: Portland's Revolutionaries 1960-1975. What unions have you established? I was elected to be Chairman of the biggest Steelworker Union in Chicago three times. What Union have you been elected to? I think I know the answers to these questions...

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
48. Are you kidding me?
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 01:19 PM
Sep 2015

I was elected as the Business Manager for 12 years at a 250 member union and re-elected 3 times. We merged with IBEW 103 in Boston.

I am now an organizer and a BA for that local and have brought in 120 new members since March.

Brady is a learning moment for people who usually don't want to know about unions. The protection afforded him by the NFLPA can be used as a lesson on belonging to a union.

I was at the Labor Day Breakfast in Boston, and President Obama said that "Brady was happy he was in a union."

That message didn't escape him.

And it hasn't escaped me.

Good luck in what you do for unions, but you don't know me, but if you want to converse through email, I'll show you all the work I've done over the past 25 years in the movement.


 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
50. Feel like an idiot yet?
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 06:13 PM
Sep 2015

Maybe you're smarter than these folks, too. By the way, I was at the Labor Day Breakfast with the President this morning. What did you do?

News


‘Brady Is Free’: Obama, Others Reference QB At Boston Labor Day Event

September 7, 2015 12:43 PM



BOSTON (CBS) – Football and politics don’t always go hand in hand. But on Labor Day in Boston they did, thanks to Patriots quarterback Tom Brady.

Brady, who successfully challenged his 4-game DeflateGate suspension, was referenced multiple times during the annual Labor Day union rally and breakfast at the Park Plaza Hotel in Boston.

Among those mentioning Brady was President Barack Obama, who didn’t waste any time with a DeflateGate reference.

“It’s always good to be back in Boston, especially when the weather’s like this. Pretty soon fall is going to be in the air. Students are coming back. The Pats kick off on Thursday. Brady is free,” Obama said with a smile.

“Even Brady’s happy he’s got a union,” the president said later in his speech. “When Brady needs a union, we definitely need a union.”

Earlier in the event, U.S. Sen. Ed Markey joked about Brady’s union success.

“No one will question the balls of a union member ever again,” joked Markey, referencing Brady and his allegedly deflated footballs.

Steve Tolman, president of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, mentioned Brady during his speech as well.

“It’s because of the union that Tom Brady had the right to challenge the unfair punishment handed down by the NFL,” Tolman told the crowd.

Response to louis c (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tom Brady is Lucky That H...