General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Japanese Kids Can Walk to School Alone
Its a common sight on Japanese mass transit: Children troop through train cars, singly or in small groups, looking for seats.
They wear knee socks, polished patent-leather shoes, and plaid jumpers, with wide-brimmed hats fastened under the chin and train passes pinned to their backpacks. The kids are as young as 6 or 7, on their way to and from school, and there is nary a guardian in sight.
*What accounts for this unusual degree of independence? Not self-sufficiency, in fact, but group reliance, according to Dwayne Dixon, a cultural anthropologist who wrote his doctoral dissertation on Japanese youth. [Japanese] kids learn early on that, ideally, any member of the community can be called on to serve or help others, he says.
Japan has a very low crime rate, which is surely a key reason parents feel confident about sending their kids out alone. But small-scaled urban spaces and a culture of walking and transit use also foster safety and, perhaps just as important, the perception of safety."
Kaitos stepmother says she wouldnt let a 9-year-old ride the subway alone in London or New Yorkjust in Tokyo."
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/why-japanese-kids-can-walk-to-school-alone/408475/
Rex
(65,616 posts)Also they don't have 5 zillion handguns.
Bucky
(53,936 posts)Child predators don't use handguns to accost their victims, obviously.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You would be thrown in jail and lose your kids. Another over reach of laws. Can not even let your kids walk to the park.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)In part by forbidding almost all forms of firearm ownership, the country has as few as two gun-related homicides a year.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/07/a-land-without-guns-how-japan-has-virtually-eliminated-shooting-deaths/260189/
TWO gun-related murders PER YEAR.
Firearms killed 32,251 people in the United States in 2011
beevul
(12,194 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)That is a HUGE plus IMHO.
beevul
(12,194 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)That responsibility belongs squarely on the shooter.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Gun deaths are nearly as many as car crash deaths now.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/americas-top-killing-machine/384440/
beevul
(12,194 posts)BTW, 20 or so thousand of those, are suicides , which as I said, the 'Very strong gun-control laws' in Japan seem not to be effecting.
Japan has roughly 25k suicides annually, yet strict gun control.
And again, 10k non-suicide gun deaths is hardly a 'killing zone' in a country of 300 million.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)firearm homicide rate fell by 59 percent, and the firearm suicide rate fell by 65 percent, in the decade after the law was introduced, without a parallel increase in non-firearm homicides and suicides. That provides strong circumstantial evidence for the law's effectiveness.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/02/did-gun-control-work-in-australia/
beevul
(12,194 posts)Nevermind the fact that you aren't going to get Aussie style gun control in America.
Ever.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Do you even favor US having more stringent background checks, and/or closing the massive
gun-show loophole allowing ANY ONE to waltz into a gun show and buy a deadly assault weapon?
beevul
(12,194 posts)A government can not "buy back" what was never its own to begin with. No, I don't support 'buy backs', since they're an easy way to get rid of crime guns no questions asked, as well as generally ineffective at stopping gun violence.
Feel free.
There is no such thing as the 'gun show loophole', and in fact theres no loophole there at all, since congress never intended to regulate private sales whether at a gun show or in the newspaper, when it passed the brady bill in the first place.
You take issue with semi-automatic rifles, I take it?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)Mainstream America is pro-gun, so it really shouldn't.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is obvious the problem in America. 300 million of them.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Their culture does not solve every problem with a bullet.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Nor does ours.
Anti-gun folks do, however, like to lean on gun suicides for their arguments, and Japan disproves those arguments.
Report1212
(661 posts)The cultural aspect is way overwhelming everything else
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)In Australia, for example, which also has it's own version of US's "wild-west gun-slinging cowboy" culture.
"Firearm homicide rate fell by 59 percent, and the firearm suicide rate fell by 65 percent, in the decade after the law was introduced, without a parallel increase in non-firearm homicides and suicides. That provides strong circumstantial evidence for the law's effectiveness."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/02/did-gun-control-work-in-australia/
Report1212
(661 posts)Meaning australia didnt have a whole lot of guns to begin with, and they also did this at a time when global economy was going up and global crime everywhere including in US was dramatically falling.
Hell in 90s to now US gun crime just about halved and we didnt do any significant laws.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Yes, Aussie gov't's 650,000 mandatory gun buy-backs happened, and then the Australian
"murders by gun" numbers dramatically plummeted, by by 59 percent, and the firearm suicide
rate fell by 65 percent.
And not only that, perhaps more importantly, Australia has not had any mass-shooter incidents
since the new restrictions were put in place:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2012/12/16/gun_control_after_connecticut_shooting_could_australia_s_laws_provide_a.html
Exactly what part of this^ are you disputing again ?
EX500rider
(10,808 posts)Mexico and Brazil also have strong gun-control measures...didn't seem to help them a bit.
I think people have to realize violent societies are violent regardless of the laws.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)So we should just all give up, armor up, live in fortresses (IF we can afford one), etc.
Is THIS^ the America you want? It would seem so.
EX500rider
(10,808 posts)...I just pointed out that strong gun control hasn't done squat for Mexico or Brazil or South Africa etc...
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Unfortunately our political system relies on divisiveness. So things fall apart.
I can remember being a kid in Los Angeles in the 50s and we went anywhere anytime and nobody thought much about it.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)tblue37
(65,217 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,046 posts)Unless it was raining or snowing. And we played in the neighborhood unsupervised, road our bicycles all over town, and did not carry cell phones (maybe a dime for a pay phone).
The universal answer to that seems to be, well that was the 60's, it's more dangerous today...
Bunk. It is our perception of danger - strongly encouraged by those who want to keep us in a state of fear - that has changed.
NOLALady
(4,003 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)a car service (or so they said) heck once they let us out of school in the eye of a hurricane and it started back up as we walked home stepping over downed trees and power lines. The larger kids had to grab the smaller ones as they blew by us. You had to live over a mile away to gt a bus pass, my luck I lived exactly a mile away.
When I was in high school, my parents put me down to pick up my brother if he was sick, I had to leave my classes to get him at his school which was in the opposite direction than mine, walking all the way. Nothing like walking a sick kid home. Oh well, I was 10 years older than him and my parents did not want to leave work.
Not exaggerating.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Perhaps it is the stress of overcrowding also.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I took the public bus home from my half-day kindergarten alone. I was small for my age, and had just turned 5 when the school year started, but pretty quickly the regular drivers on my route knew who I was, and looked out for me.
Yeah, it was different back then.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)It a very 'red' area. Lots of guns.
Children walk everywhere with their friends or alone. Very safe and I hope it stays that way.
egduj
(805 posts)But they had to implement women-only train cars due to the widespread sexual assaults going on while commuting.