General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn The UK, Guns Aren't The Problem, It's Knives.
Last edited Sat Oct 3, 2015, 05:59 PM - Edit history (1)
There is of course the weapon of choice, but the real question is, what is the underlying cause for one to take weapons against another. Same problem, different weapon. I was just listening to this on BBC London, the fear many people have of WTF is going on.
http://news.sky.com/story/1520156/knife-offences-up-amid-rise-in-overall-crime?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter
Update: I deleted a quote from townhall.com which was here that has been pointed out to me is not a good source.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)apparently knives are the problem. Definitely, knives are less lethal, but I wonder, is this just natural to mankind to violently attack others. If so, then that needs to be considered the root cause and also dealt with.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But non-political bombings are AFAIK essentially unknown.
It's more difficult to get guns in the UK than in the US, so the capability to do this is lessened (though not eliminated). There also doesn't seem to be as much desire to do it in the first place.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)I know small shotguns are allowed for country dwellers but what about pistols?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though keep in mind "allowed" and "actually available" are different questions; in Cumbria in 2010 Bird used a legal .22 rimfire rifle to kill his first victim and an illegal magazined shotgun to kill the remaining 11 victims.
Pistols are essentially banned; even the UK Olympic shooting team has to go to the Channel Islands to train.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)dynamics are that some strike out with knives or guns, etc. That, will be the root cause IMO.
Thanks for the link!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)Homicide by knife hit a 30/40 year peak in the UK in 2006/07 at 272.
That's 272 too many of course but mercifully low compared to the US 'murder with firearms' figure in your chart .
beevul
(12,194 posts)If that's 'civilization', I'll take a pass.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 4, 2015, 08:41 AM - Edit history (1)
or at best minimized this will likely morph on and on. What I see is the lack of a focus on what is the root cause of gun and knife violence. At one time it was mostly robberies and the like, but now it seems likely for sport. Also, likely it's indicative that some need some help with their emotions, but there is no easy route for them to get the help they need. The societal systems are failing.
It's much like putting band-aids on cancer as a treatment.
I'm sure someone/some group someplace is looking into this too.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkseaton_shootings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_school_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbria_shootings
I'm not aware of a knife massacre: in the UK as elsewhere, guns are the weapon of choice for lone people who want to cause a lot of carnage. (Though bombings have a much longer history in the UK than in a lot of places, but bombings for some reason almost always have a political motive.)
Interestingly, the one mass shooting in the UK since the reforms after Dunblane did not begin as a random mass spree killing but rather as a domestic murder which then escalated.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Yes, a gun is definitely more lethal, no question at all, but why do some individuals strike out like this. Is it a pattern, are there common causative factors at work?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)which is still stigmatized in US culture, and a lot of macho idiots who think gunz make them "manly."
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)people need help and they don't even realize it. Yeah, the macho thing is so damn stupid. The damn fools who think guns make a man.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I've compared us to Brazil a few times (another western Hemisphere post-colonial country with a legacy of slavery and racism and high inequality). Brazil has significantly higher gun violence than us, but has apparently only had one random mass spree shooting, at a school in Rio in 2011. Whereas it's been something of a feature of American culture for a while now.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)violence. One could avoid it, what parts of town, etc., be careful, etc., etc. ... but now it just strikes out, and also against children. It is, it seems to be "something of a feature of American culture for a while now."
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)sociologists are studying this in detail.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But get less sensationalistic press coverage
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And for the most part young males are in school.
If I had to guess.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)due to the 24/7 exposure they know they will get on every channel.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)plus the instant notoriety.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)stop publicizing the names if the idiots.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)shadowrider
(4,941 posts)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570996/At-27-dead-109-injured-gang-knife-wielding-men-attack-train-station-China.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China_%282010%E2%80%9312%29
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/13946-china-school-knife-massacre-why-no-media-coverage
Enough for you? There are more, just google knife massacres or knife killings.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm well aware of Chinese knife massacres, which seem like part of a fairly long pattern of edged weapon massacres in East Asian history.
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)That's odd because according to the Guardian , the latest increase follows a four year downward trend and still shows a 50% drop from the peak six years ago.
Am I missing something or is that Sky quote in the OP a tad misleading?
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/16/knife-in-england-and-wales-up-for-first-time-in-four-years
Knife crime has increased in England and Wales for the first time in four years, with the number of assaults with blades rising 13%, according to the latest set of police recorded crime figures.
The Office for National Statistics said the 2% rise in all knife crime offences in the 12 months to March marked the end of a downward trend in the previous four years but the total remained more than 50% below its peak six years ago.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)could be misleading, but in the article it said:
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)Last years' 13% rise is certainly a cause for concern but it's just wrong to characterise it as part of a long term trend as that sky quote does.
ETA: We just don't know yet.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)that it was actually a bastardised Sky quote courtesy of Townhall.
Sources are such a minefield sometimes - thanks for taking it out of the OP.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)A nutcase with a semi auto assault rifle that has a 30 round clip filled with hollow point bullets
Or...
A nutcase with a knife?
I can outrun a knife. A hollow point bullet? Not so much.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)social dynamics causing one to strike out with a gun or a knife.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I can think of no good rational reason to randomly murder innocent people.
You could say increasing social isolation, lack of upward social movement, cronic unemployment, lack of schooling, his mommy did not show him love and his daddy beat him. I dunno.
Of course millions of people live with these same issues and worse and never would whip out a gun and start killing people over it.
That scum that did the latest mass murder is fu**ing evil.
That's all I got, sorry.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)for organic reasons, and then environmentally influenced toward evilness. So, they are on the edge, maybe even well hidden, and then eventually they act out.
I've wondered if they see these other mass killings and then see that, somehow in their mind, that it's OK to do. To me, that is a reason for good gun regulation, I suppose they could always get one, but it seems it could be made harder.
Yep, I would much rather have someone coming at me with a knife than a gun. I wonder if the politicians will do anything, so often it's a 3rd rail for them, none want to touch it. Thanks for getting back to me!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Maybe there's too many people on this earth now?
Seems like there was an experiment done with animals where they were all crowded together in a small space to see what would happen.
Don't recall the type but apparently they started attacking and killing each other.
Mankind use to always have a frontier or a wild west area to go to if you didn't like where you were born.
But not anymore. Like I said, no excuse for murder but I wonder if overcrowding plays a role?
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)forgotten it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Calhoun
I definitely think there are some causative factors from overcrowding and also hence IMO the devaluation of life. I think we are seeing that now, and this, coupled with limited resources on earth, is going to lead IMO to some pretty nasty times in our lives.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)It really seems like overcrowding could be causing some of these terrible things eh?
Could this even be an underlying cause of the world wars where millions and millions of people perished?
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)start. Groups of people/nations have their own ideologues and are unwilling to bend. I'm wondering what's going to happen as we run out of resources. In math there's something called the 'infinity test' to see if a theorem or something is valid. You take a number to infinity as a test case. So, consider earth, run the population to infinity! Yep, that sure won't work. Question is, when do we reach the breaking point. I guess TPTB are looking into this. You and I certainly aren't the only ones concerned, but it sure does not get much coverage in MSM. And none ever talk about how to manage it.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Maybe NASA needs to get cracking on that mars mission eh?
Humanity might really need a new frontier
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I think the problem is in controlling population. It's such a difficult one to solve. It would involve changing the cultural beliefs of many third world nations, and that isn't something that is going to happen very quickly or easily.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thanks for the link.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Actually republicans believe that. Is there any truth to this? Or morals left the building?
Who knows I guess it could be a lot of factors.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)We live under a system that requires competition. Competition breeds more hurt feelings and dissatisfaction than a system of greater cooperation.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)for whatever reason and a shooing becomes a leveling event to them, perhaps. Definitely, we live in a society where most things are win/lose. It is not healthy. The reward system should be based on greater cooperation, not greater competition. Of course all individuals won't respond shooting, but some do. This certainly does not cover all of the causes IMO, but is likely one of the causative factors.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,266 posts)That's what townhall.com is for. Here's what you quoted:
Matt Vespa | Jul 18, 2015
Gun ownership is an alien concept with our British cousins across the Atlantic, but that doesnt mean that violent crime has been reduced. In fact, with no guns readily available, though there are gun crimes in the UK, knives seem to be the weapon of choice. This isn't surprising. The rise in knife attacks has been in the UK press since 2008and theyve increased by 13 percent since last year (via Sky News):
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/07/18/uk-knife-attacks-are-surging-n2026497
(Sky got it right, by the way, since they started their article "Knife crime has increased for the first time in many years, annual crime statistics have revealed."
I did a comparison between knife homicide in the UK and USA a couple of years ago:
Sharp instrument 698
Hitting, kicking, etc. 401
Blunt instrument 167
Strangulation/asphyxiation 158
Shooting 140
Other 320
Total 1,884
(note the years for recording crime don't run from Jan-Dec, for some reason. So "combined data for 2008/09 to 2010/11" means 3 years, starting 2008, 2009 and 2010)
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/hosb0212/hosb0212?view=Binary
These can be compared with the US data, available for 2008 here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/oct/05/us-homicide-rates
The US had a homicide by sharp instrument rate of 0.67 per 100,000 per year; England and Wales, roughly, 0.43 (about 55 million population). Hitting etc. - USA: 0.30; E&W: 0.25. So those 2 categories are roughly equal. Shooting: USA: 3.33; E&W: 0.09.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2282358
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)I did a Google, saw it on townhall.com and had no idea who they were, until I saw some posts, so I referred to the Sky link. I should have deleted what townhall.com said.
Thanks for the additional information you just provided.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)I keep seeing this idea or implication that knife homicides in the UK are inordinately high and/or surging therefore gun control in the US is moot.
It's jarring because knife murders in the UK are, thankfully, fairly rare - and, as you point out, the UK rate is actually lower than that for the US .
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,578 posts)Or at least they were the last time I spent any time there, which is awhile, admittedly.
What's their murder rate like compared with ours?
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Contrary1
(12,629 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)similar, but the weapon of choice is restricted. Serious restrictions would be a good start. As some have said, better to have a mass knifing attempted than a mass gun slaying attempted.
valerief
(53,235 posts)The U.S. isn't the only country that ships jobs to China and hacks away at the middle class.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)the world as hopeless today to live a reasonable life. I feel sorry for kids today that have no resources from their parents. Thatcherism and Reaganism have been the most destructive forces on a society IMO in my lifetime.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)The attacker stabbed 20 school children. All of them lived. If the attacker had a gun I'm sure not all of those kids would have survived.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)step IMO. And we certainly don't know all of the causative factors, and IMO that will take awhile and then to find solutions. ... but getting better control of the availability of guns is something that can be started quickly.
I find it difficult to believe that congress, etc. will sit idly by, but likely that might happen. There is so much money in guns and ammunition in this country, it's hard to tell what might happen to improve the situation.
This all said, there are responsible gun owners and they too are in agreement I've read that we need better control of the availability of guns. In one poll I saw the majority of Americans want that, but congress is DUH!
Jeneral2885
(1,354 posts)Staring the ex-Pink Ranger Amy Jo Johnson. A Canadian cop show.
"A knife's as bad as a gun. It never sticks, never jams, never runs out of ammo, and you don't need training to know how to use it."
Backwards Day episode.
tavernier
(12,369 posts)A lot of these macho shooters would rethink their killing spree if they had to actually plunge a knife into someone while looking them in the face, IMO. Not all, but I bet most.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)gives time to think, whereas a gun is over in an instant.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)from "its da meds not da gunz" to the chorus of retread talking points from prior horror show events.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Getting guns under better control is the first step IMO.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Other countries have successfully controlled mass shootings by, shockingly, strictly regulating the type of guns that can be owned and how those guns are used.
Until we do that everything else is a distraction intended to obstruct the one obvious action a society can take to reduce gun violence.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)No need for nasty comments.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)But that is just me. Oh, and perhaps the New York Times, which in today's edition also noted, on its front page, just how dubious this particular deflection tactic is.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)including overcrowding and comparisons to other countries for the most part. It was a fine discussion till now. My husband developed a mental illness before he took his life a little less than two years ago so you can stuff your reply.
malaise
(268,695 posts)Guns are made to kill
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)malaise
(268,695 posts)Wink