General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFlaws in Polling Data Exposed as U.S. Campaign Season Heats Up
Polls for the 2016 U.S. presidential race have been defying all expectations: Donald Trump as the persistent Republican frontrunner even as he insults large swaths of the country and brushes off policy questions; Hillary Clinton haunted by an email controversy Democrats shrug off while a Vermont socialist keeps gaining on her.
Are the polls correct? While that is hardly a new question, doubts are intensifying after a series of high-profile misfires around the world in the past year, notably in Greece, Israel and the UK. As politics and business lean increasingly on surveys and data, technological and social shifts are combining to challenge polls reliability in an entirely new way. Polling professionals have no solution; investors are wary.
"There isnt a pollster out there who thinks about this seriously who isnt a little bit uneasy," said Kirby Goidel, editor of the book "Political Polling in the Digital Age." Interviews with more than a dozen pollsters in the U.S. and around the world revealed similar anxiety.
Brad Schruder, a director of foreign exchange at Bank of Montreal, said what many in the investment world have been thinking: "It makes you wonder, how much weight should we attach to these polls?"
Telephone Avoidance
Global Failures
A single voter
Robocalls
Rising Anger
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-29/flaws-in-polling-data-exposed-as-u-s-campaign-season-heats-up
still_one
(92,116 posts)demographics, but I also think caller ID has an impact to, especially because people are tired of robocalls, so if they see a caller ID they do not recognize, they won't answer it.
Something to think about for sure.
Thanks
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)People follow a crowd when it comes to down to it. If someone tells you the crowd thinks this, most people want to be part of it.
Sanders momentum is proof of that, seeing his massive crowds is contagious. In spite of the media push polls promoting others. Push polls are only effective with the boob tube Generation. Most people get their news elsewhere these days.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Old people who skew conservative. Haven't answered my home phone in probably five years.
Friends know my mobile, even then won't answer if I don't know the caller ID. The days of answering the phone are last century
postulater
(5,075 posts)Just curious, why do you keep yours?
I can't think of a good reason why we keep ours.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)For Internet access in the states.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)And will never go back.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)and uses a walker. It's not easy for her to get around. Nevertheless she insisted on answering the phone despite having an answering machine. She doesn't have caller I.D. When she recently complained about answering the phone only to find it was a telemarketer or a fraudster from Microsoft, sometimes several times a day, I had to tell her to stop answering the phone. It is not necessary anymore. It was a hard sell but she finally agreed.
P.S. she's a Democrat.
I also had a friend in her '70s who had a Tracfone and a landline and intended to keep the landline in case of emergency. She also was a registered Democrat.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)In fact, just the opposite is true. Admittedly there are lots of junk polls out there (DU polls, for one) and most people don't understand the difference.
It's also true that legitimate, rigorous polls can miss the mark. That's why AAPOR* members spend so much time testing methodologies and trying to understand the influence of technology on the representativeness of the responses.
*http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/default.aspx
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)There are most certainly push polls out there, but it is not "most." Check out a site like 538, which actually assesses poll methodology and poll performance.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)but again, scientific polls have questions that are carefully crafted to mitigate bias and have sampling methodology designed to poll a broad spectrum of demographics, again to mitigate bias.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Some polls, sure. Most, no.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)But if we're talking about national political polls, it's not a matter of my opinion. There are those who abide by the AAPOR standards and those that don't. One big tell is whether the pollster's methodology is open and reported so that other researchers can critique it and try to replicate the results, just as is standard in hard science data collection.
I realize that to those outside of any profession it's hard to ferret out the good from the bad and that unfortunately the internet has made us feel like armchair experts because there's so much data readily available. The problem is that GIGO is more true now than ever.
canoeist52
(2,282 posts)And in a cold wet and windy weather. We vote - we win!
Sisterwife15
(21 posts)They must be wrong!!
Seems to be how it goes around here.
This site ranks them. Some polls are better than others I suppose.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/
Ace Rothstein
(3,157 posts)Sisterwife15
(21 posts)I tried going to that site and it's now German as-seen-on-TV products