General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoseph E Stiglitz: The great trans-Pacific free-trade charade
Last edited Sun Oct 4, 2015, 05:57 AM - Edit history (1)
Bangkok Post | 4 Oct 2015
As negotiators and ministers from the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim countries meet in Atlanta in an effort to finalise the details of the sweeping new Trans-Pacific Partnership, some sober analysis is warranted. The biggest regional trade and investment agreement in history is not what it seems.
You will hear much about the importance of the TPP for free trade.
The reality is that this is an agreement to manage its members trade and investment relations and to do so on behalf of each countrys most powerful business lobbies.
Make no mistake: It is evident from the main outstanding issues, over which negotiators are still haggling, that the TPP is not about free trade...
...The TPP would manage trade in pharmaceuticals through a variety of seemingly arcane rule changes on issues such as patent linkage, data exclusivity and biologics. The upshot is that pharmaceutical companies would effectively be allowed to extend sometimes almost indefinitely their monopolies on patented medicines, keep cheaper generics off the market and block biosimilar competitors from introducing new medicines for years. That is how the TPP will manage trade for the pharmaceutical industry if the US gets its way...snip
MORE: http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/716932/the-great-trans-pacific-free-trade-charade
Joseph Eugene Stiglitz, ForMemRS,[2] FBA (born February 9, 1943) is an American economist and a professor at Columbia University. He is a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001) and the John Bates Clark Medal (1979). He is a former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank and is a former member and chairman of the (US president's) Council of Economic Advisers.[3][4] He is known for his critical view of the management of globalization, free-market economists (whom he calls "free market fundamentalists" , and some international institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stiglitz
wolfie001
(2,199 posts)....into small bits. How 'bout you?
nxylas
(6,440 posts)He may not have the power to "tear it up".
Scuba
(53,475 posts)There's still LOTS of time for him to do even more egregious destruction of the nation, its standing in the world, and the people's welfare.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)To the detriment of every living thing and soon to be extinct life form, but hey, you'd have to be some kind of nut to care about how your individual actions negatively affect others.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)do something about it?
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)With every dollar in the markets they are doing something. Just like every slave owner did something. They legitimized and normalized the cruel and horrible mistreatment of others for gains for themselves.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Showing what the twits in the US media won't
Lewis B. Chesty Puller, USMC