General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe joyful, illiterate kindergartners of Finland. (I'm so jealous.)
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/10/the-joyful-illiterate-kindergartners-of-finland/408325/In the U.S.:
In Finland:
At 9:30 a.m., the boys were called to line up for a daily activity called Morning Circle. (The girls were already insidehaving chosen to play boardgames indoors.) They trudged across the yard in their rubber boots, pleading with their teachers to play longereven though they had already been outside for an hour. As they stood in file, I asked them to describe what theyd been doing on the playground.
Making dams, sang a chorus of three boys.
Nothing else? one of their teachers prodded.
Nothing else, they confirmed.
[Children] learn so well through play, Anni-Kaisa Osei Ntiamoah, one of the preschools kindergarten teachers, whos in her seventh year in the classroom, told me. They dont even realize that they are learning because theyre so interested [in what theyre doing].
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Although not much choice since my school was made of the same stuff.
These socialist states have a lot to teach about how success-driven capitalist education is yesterday's way to learn.
I wish the same respect for innovation and new ways not tied to capitalist ideology and the work ethic as sacred cow was given to non-white socialist states.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Which my mother ( RIP) then shared publicly to anyone who would listen.
For 35 years.
i DO remember I walked to Kindergarten.
No mothers had cars during the day back them, kids walked to school if it was less than a mile.
and if you could read, it considered a "bad thing" for reasons I never did figure out.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)And I remember stomping through snow that was half as tall as I was to get there.
It was fun.
(And no "snow days" either. Snow days are for wimps who drive cars.)
On edit: I also remember having to wear "snow pants" under my skirt that I would take off as soon as I got there. That is one memory of the past that I'm not nostalgic about.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)tested.
Then- holy fuck! You expect them to know what? Opt Out! OPT OUT!
The thought that maybe Jayden or Brayden or Kayden may not be the little Einstein they thought he was, is too much of a threat. Meanwhile the kid does 4 days of soccer a week and spends a whopping 10 minutes learning math.
Look, I'm not saying drill Kindergartners in Quantum Mechanics; and certainly reading is something that kids pick up at diff. speeds- but at the same time those schools that say "no reading before 2nd grade" are likewise doing kids a disservice.
I'll go out on a limb and speculate that the Joyful Kindergartners of Finland won't be competing with their Chinese and Indian counterparts for the tech jobs of the mid-21st century.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)To do mindless repetitive coding. That's what rote learning gets you.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)"authorities", to be sure.
My personal ideal with kids and learning is to nurture the natural inquisitive spirt and love of learning. And play is bar none one of the BEST ways to learn IMHO.
Unfortunately I've seen too many situations in the US where people just think facts and science and the like are inherently suspect, (surely you've noticed the anti-intellectualism streak?) and they aren't telling their kids to get a chemistry set and start screwing around, they're methodically loading up the Honda minivan for 3 hours on the soccer field every afternoon because nothing is more important than making sure this kid becomes the next Pele.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)More than half of the relatives in our extended family are in math, science, or engineering fields.
I do strongly agree that play is an important part of learning, and hands-on activities in general. That's why I'm concerned about what's happening in kindergarten. Worksheets and drills fill up too many hours in kindergartens these days. All to serve the test-gods.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But they couldn't even get all day state kindergarten- ours did it as their last year in preschool.
I think they've changed it, statewide, since. But not sure.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and then complain about the way schools determine how much kids actually know, which usually involves some form test.
I'm out there in the trenches, Scoot, I know what I'm talking about.
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)the pig every day does not make it fatter................
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)My children are all grown now, but they were spread far enough apart that each one had a different experience. The third got the high-test, high-pressure experience -- and it didn't benefit him or anyone else in his class. He dealt with school-based anxiety starting in elementary school. And the teachers were so anxious themselves (except for the ones on the verge of retirement) that they were no help with that issue.
My oldest, the one with the most relaxed, fun kindergarten experience, ended up with an engineering PhD from a top school. She has no problem keeping up with her Chinese and Indian counterparts.
Reading and math are both subject to developmental readiness. One of my nephews struggled with reading all the way into high school -- even had to use audio books made at "Recording for the Blind" -- but the skill suddenly clicked in 10th grade. And he also went on to get an engineering degree. And a top student of my husband's said he felt dumb until fourth grade, because it took that long before his reading ability reached the level of his math.
So many students like this, students who are very bright but don't learn on the standard timeline or in the standard manner, are at risk these days.
Meanwhile, students in Finland are at or near the top in world rankings, even in math.
P.S. Education these days is driven by tests. And test content is primarily driven by what is TESTABLE. So if something is difficult to test -- like public speaking skills, or empathy, or listening skills -- then it falls out of the curriculum. Not because it is unimportant, but because the testing companies haven't come up with a way to test it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)...before they learn to dread going like in another industrialized nation.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
WillowTree This message was self-deleted by its author.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)I can remember drawing pictures of apples and chucking a tricycle out an upstairs window. No calculus.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)They are far too stupid to learn. Amiright?
My four year old is well on her way to learning to read and she has only been read to. We are such monsters!
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)you'll end up smarter, or a better reader overall, than someone who doesn't learn till age 7.
Your child is developmentally ready right now. But forcing reading skills on a child who isn't developmentally ready for this step not benefit the child -- and is likely to frustrate her.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)People underestimate kids; they're made to learn. They can't learn "too soon" or "too much" -- a child is a learning machine. The very structure of their brain is conducive to the learning process.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Forcing them when they aren't ready seems really counterproductive to me. I'm speaking as an early reader myself--always experienced reading as more of a tropism than an actual skill. Oddly, that caused me trouble because the school wanted to teach reading their way, and if you already knew how you didn't fit in.