General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUh oh. Argument over whole milk heating up again.
Recent conventional wisdom has been that one should drink low fat or skim milk. Now some are saying otherwise. Dairy industry certain to make a big deal out of this. Stay tuned for a resumption of the milk wars. Got milk?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/10/06/for-decades-the-government-steered-millions-away-from-whole-milk-was-that-wrong/
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's not even a real food.
Sorry, I need milkfat, particularly since radical Hindu activists are shutting off my access to meat.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Wouldn't that just be beef?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,170 posts)store bought nut milks (and soy, coconut, etc) usually have carageenan as an additive. It is an emusufier and thickener extracted from seaweed. Totally natural BUT it causes inflammation, especially in the gut. Now the SO brand has removed carageenan, but has replaced it with xanthan gum which is safe for most people.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)This joke is 100% stolen.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Orrex
(63,199 posts)Condom-mint would be awesome.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Nut Juice in a Sack
DebJ
(7,699 posts)titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Just sayin.' "Drupe juice" probably would not be a big sell either.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)Old English meoluc (West Saxon), milc (Anglian), from Proto-Germanic *meluks "milk" (cognates: Old Norse mjolk, Old Frisian melok, Old Saxon miluk, Dutch melk, Old High German miluh, German Milch, Gothic miluks), from *melk- "to milk," from PIE root *melg- "to wipe, to rub off," also "to stroke; to milk," in reference to the hand motion involved in milking an animal (cognates: Greek amelgein, Latin mulgere, Old Church Slavonic mlesti, Lithuanian melu "to milk," Old Irish melg "milk," Sanskrit marjati "wipes off" . Old Church Slavonic noun meleko (Russian moloko, Czech mleko) is considered to be adopted from Germanic.
Of milk-like plant juices from late 14c. Milk chocolate is first recorded 1723; milk shake is first recorded 1889, for a variety of creations, but the modern version is only from the 1930s. Milk tooth (1727) uses the word in its figurative sense "period of infancy," attested from 17c. To cry over spilt milk is first attested 1836 in writing of Canadian humorist Thomas C. Haliburton. Milk and honey is from the Old Testament phrase describing the richness of the Promised Land (Num. xvi:13, Old English meolc and hunie). Milk of human kindness is from "Macbeth" (1605).
milk (v.)
Old English melcan, milcian, meolcian "to milk, give milk, suckle," from Proto-Germanic *melk- "to milk" (cognates: Dutch melken, Old High German melchan, German melken), from PIE root *melg- (see milk (n.)). Figurative sense of "exploit for profit" is first found 1520s. Related: Milked; milking.
I wonder how one milks human kindness anyway. Where's the nipple for that?
Javaman
(62,515 posts)I drink raw milk from a USDA inspected Dairy. A dairy that supplies milk to a national ice cream brand as well (Blue Bell).
I have been drinking it for 5 years. I'm in my 50's and get yearly physicals and have yet to see any problem with cholesterol, high blood pressure or anything that was supposedly associated with drinking whole milk.
So take that for what it is.
but don't get me wrong, pasteurization certainly has it's place. However, I do have a real issue with homogenization. that needs to be done away with.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)You can have whole milk which is pasteurized and homogenized or not.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)but the easiest way to get unhomogenized milk is to get it from a grade A raw milk dairy.
I read about a possible cause for the increasing cardio/vascular disease being homogenized milk 40 years ago. The hypothesis being that the process that breaks the membrane around the globules of butterfat exposes them so that they can oxidize, thus the cholesterol becoming corrosive. This, if true, would lead to scaring of the arterial walls giving a place for plaques to build up.
I bet there are no studies done on homogenized v. non-homogenized milk and the incidence of atherosclerosis because they docs and scientist are comfortable with the statistical and clinical studies about whole milk and heart disease. In fact they may not even be aware that there are chemical differences between homogenized and non-homogenized milk
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)In this case the evidence now appears to be that drinking whole milk does not appear to have a significant impact on incidence of heart disease. If what you are saying did occur I would think there would be an impact.
As to the question - there are lots of dairies which produce pasteurized but not homogenized milk. It is way easier to get than raw milk because it can be found in regular retail grocery stores, while raw milk generally cannot. Most retail grocery stores will not touch raw milk because of the potential liability.
Javaman
(62,515 posts)but in my opinion, homogenization should be done away with completely.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Consider me a moron on this subject. And others if you must. Let's start with this one.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)it keeps the milk from separating. If you milk a cow and leave that bucket of milk sitting there, soon you will have a layer of thick cream and a layer of low-fat milk. Homoginized milk means it is treated so that it doesn't separate. The fat is emulsified to keep it from separating from the liquid.
Javaman
(62,515 posts)it was introduced so "housewives" would buy their milk, cream and butter separately. Prior to homogenization, they could do all those things from just unhomogenized milk.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You couldn't just take it from a milk bottle.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)I'm pretty sure most of us know you need to churn the cream to get the butter. He said they could get all those things from unhomogenized milk. He didn't say you could pluck a lb of butter out of the milk bottle, lol.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)(after cheese).
It turns out housewives were not exactly fond of churning to get butter, and preferred sticks. Even when you could get unhomogenized milk.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)And my grandmother always churned her own butter until she retired when I was a little kid in the early 80's. My mom even did it for special occasions (using the jar method and whipping cream).
At any rate, the point is that you could. Not that everyone did.
Javaman
(62,515 posts)but whatever.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Fat isn't water soluble. So it "rises to the top" on raw milk.
In homogenization, they spray the milk through a material with very small holes. That breaks the fat into very small pieces. Those pieces are so small that they do not significantly clump together in the milk.
That keeps the fat distributed throughout the milk instead of separating into basically non-fat milk and cream.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Didn't Blue Bell just have a massive recall over listeria?
Javaman
(62,515 posts)the milk was fine, it was the processing plant in Kansas that wasn't clean.
What happened to "the little creamery in Brenham"?
Javaman
(62,515 posts)the farm I get my milk from is Stryk Dairy in Flatonia.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Whole it otherwise, it's best avoided entirely.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)Not equally by all cultures or regions, of course, but it's probably been part of the human diet since the agricultural revolution.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Have you ever been to a dairy factory farm?
There is nothing natural about what goes on there.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)All of them, even the "organic" ones, have been genetically engineered for millennia.
"Natural" is a false standard. Nothing that humans do or can do is "unnatural," so it's simply a label applied or withheld depending on the preferences of the speaker.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)smiley
(1,432 posts)spit milk all over my keyboard!
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)to my ear?
Orrex
(63,199 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)"Boinky"
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)But I did not suggest otherwise.
My point is the milk we drink now is not comparable to the milk we have been drinking for millennia.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Nutritionally it's directly comparable.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)You're cherry-picking, if you'll excuse the quasi-pun.
You approve of one kind of "unnatural," so you decide it's not a big deal.
But you reject another kind of "unnatural," so you declare it unacceptable.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I also didn't say I approved of unnatural vegetables.
Basically nothing we eat today is similar to what we ate millennia ago. Thus, I don't think that is a reasonable standard to determine food choices.
I do think people ought to be aware of how dairy cows are raised in factory farms and then make an informed choice.
It would also be good if people were similarly informed about the fruits and vegetables they consider eating.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,376 posts)The milk my mother drank as a child was unpasteurized and gave her diphtheria.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)A millennia ago we did not even know about germs and about a hundred years ago breweries in NYC had herds of cows which they fed mostly brewer's grain - hardly any hay or grass. Resulted in unhealthy cows and unheathy milk and unhealthy children.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It's also extracted from cows in a very different manner than it was in the past.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Modern genetic engineering refers to a far more technical process.
Facility Inspector
(615 posts)you'd definitely want non plant protein sources to help you hunt/seek food from sunup to sundown.
Prior to the fuxation of the sacred/profane and science, that's all people could do to survive.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)We buy 2%. And the state of Ohio's WIC program just changed their milk allowance to include 1%, skim, and fat free only. I'm sure the dairy farms are feeling that effect.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)It helps in the development of the brain if nothing else.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)They will only allow 1% at the most. I think the change took effect in July of this year?
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/392766
Mature human milk contains 3%--5% fat, 0.8%--0.9% protein, 6.9%--7.2% carbohydrate calculated as lactose, and 0.2% mineral constituents expressed as ash. Its energy content is 60--75 kcal/100 ml.
In general, the gross composition of cow's milk in the U.S. is 87.7% water, 4.9% lactose (carbohydrate), 3.4% fat, 3.3% protein, and 0.7% minerals (referred to as ash
hunter
(38,310 posts)But milk turns my gut into a rumbling...
Which is an odd thing. My dad's side of the family had many dairy farmers, and many older relatives who still drank milk.
One of my nieces, FFA as a kid, and now in college, has decided goats will be the dairy animal of an uncertain future, and local cheeses the primary dairy product.
Industrial scale dairy farms are cow hell. Fewer and fewer dairy farms today have happy cows eating green grass on sunny hillsides.
I didn't used to have anything against cow milk until my life's adventures exposed me to huge commercial dairy operations. Unhappy cows living on mountains of cow shit eating industrial swill...
My wife and I did buy liquid milk by the gallon as our children were growing up.
If I was raising small children today I'd skip the traditional U.S. childhood diet of cow-milk-on-breakfast-cereal and cow-milk-in-a-glass.
There are better, less damaging to the earth, alternatives to the protein and calcium the milk industry brags about.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)But my sister has never been able to drink milk. She can eat cheese. Go figure.
There are many pastured dairies around. Particularly in Pennsylvania.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Just check the nutrition label and if the sugar content is low, this means the product is low in lactose and will present less of a problem to those who are lactose intolerant.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)Most people know about lactose but not as many know about casein.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Lactose is a simple sugar that's mostly found in milk.
Before agriculture, humans only got lactose from breast milk. So we evolved to stop making lactose digesting enzymes after we stopped nursing. Without that enzyme, you can't digest the lactose. But the bacteria inside you can. Your gut is rumbling because the bacteria are having a party on the massive boost in food - they aren't competing with you for lactose.
Most cheese making involves bacteria partially digesting coagulated milk. The bacteria break the lactose into even simpler sugars (galactose and glucose). You can always digest those, so no bacteria party in your gut.
Ethnic background matters only in as much as some of our post-agriculture ancestors used milk for food. Since they kept drinking milk, they kept making the enzyme to digest lactose. Eventually certain ethic groups became more resistant to the "turn off the enzyme" effect. But the enzyme will be shut off in anyone who eats no lactose for a while.
If you really want to eat something with lactose in it, you can buy pills with the lactose-digesting enzyme in it next to the vitamins. Take it with the lactose-containing food and there will be no party in your gut.
StarlightGold
(365 posts)for me.
I used to drink nothing but skim, and then realized I may as well just drink water.
Love the richness of it.
JeffHead
(1,186 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)There seems to be plenty of choices in the milk aisle, and that's good. Everyone should mind their own business.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)If whole milk is actually good for you then we should be serving it to school kids and not lowfat milk. Same with WIC programs, etc.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)that one problem with drinking skim milk was that your body needed the presence of fat (as in 2% or whole milk) to properly absorb the calcium in the milk. Makes sense to me.
And for a long time it was still suggested that children be on whole milk at least to age 2, and the only reason I could ever glean for the recommendation to switch to skim was the absurd notion that they'd get fat drinking whole milk. As if other aspects of diet and life-style had no connection to weight gain.
I rarely drink regular milk these days, but I do use half and half in my coffee, and for the milk in any baking or cooking I do that calls for milk.
hunter
(38,310 posts)I'm not sure they would have accepted cow's milk at all.
In any case, children ought to be breastfed. Ours were, even with my wife working. (It was a family friendly workplace and we lived nearby.)
If that's not possible, the only thing that ought to go into a baby bottle is human breast milk or infant formula. No cow's milk, and especially no juice or other sorts of sugar water. (Ask any dentist about some of the children's mouths they've seen.)
I don't believe industrial scale dairy operations are good for anyone; not people, not cows, and not the natural environment. There are many good alternatives to over-hyped, over-processed, industrial scale milk production.
My dairy family was always cynical about skim milk. It was clear to them that producers pushed it because it could be sold for near the price of whole milk, and then the cream and butter sold separately for greater overall profits.
Milk does seem to be the only thing that works for some recipes. Since I don't keep milk in the fridge, I keep canned evaporated milk around so I don't have to drive to the store when I decide to make something that requires milk. I haven't yet tried the "boxed" milks that require no refrigeration.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)a bit past age two. Neither one was ever much of a cow's milk drinker, but their father is somewhat lactose intolerant, and they may also be. It's not very important.
I suppose someone who never keeps milk around could keep the non-fat dry milk, although again we're dealing with the non-fat aspect of it. But then, perhaps when adding the water to it, you could make it thicker, which wouldn't exactly put fat in, but might not be so watery in the recipe. I've had bread recipes that call for the non-fat dry milk as an ingredient. Again, in my case because I normally have half and half around, I generally have no problem with a milk ingredient when cooking or baking.
phylny
(8,378 posts)unopened, in case we need it since it has such a long shelf life. I'd leave it on the shelf in the pantry, but then if you need it, it's room temperature, and not too delicious that way
I had read somewhere that the milk producers were really happy with the advent of skimmed, 1%, 2% milk because it left more cream for them to produce more butter. Does that make any sense?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Vitamin D is fat-soluble, and you need vitamin D to absorb calcium. But as long as you get the vitamin D from somewhere (like, the sun) then you'll absorb the calcium.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)"Organic" is nothing more than a completely arbitrary marketing gimmick. It doesn't even mean "organic" as synthetic substances are approved when "organic" substances don't work.
§205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production.
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9874504b6f1025eb0e6b67cadf9d3b40&rgn=div6&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7&idno=7#se7.3.205_1601
§205.603 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic livestock production.
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9874504b6f1025eb0e6b67cadf9d3b40&rgn=div6&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7&idno=7#se7.3.205_1603
B2G
(9,766 posts)Everything else is too heavy or too light.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)ice cream, and butter we eat?
The dairy industry would love for us all to buy skim milk (at the same price as whole) so that they can sell us the fat separately in the form of ice cream, cheese and butter. Likely the marketing of skim milk is part of the business model and it has been very effective at increasing the profits of food processors. Since 1970, we've gone from 8 pounds per person per year to 23 pounds of cheese. We are each, on average, eating 23 pounds a year of cheese annually.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Public breastfeeding and pit bulls might soon have company.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I buy the chocolate or vanilla and the vanilla is delicious over cereal..
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Nac Mac Feegle
(969 posts)in terms of explotation of the cow. And the rough handling involved in factory farming.
Do you have any idea of the violence involved in milking a soybean???
We're talking a lot more than the danger of cold hands on sensitive body parts, here. Even if it is 'just' a cow.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)I've had soy milk. I won't knowingly drink it again.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Some of those chocolate or vanilla ones have as much sugar as a soda. Reading the labels is important.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)no effect on blood glucose levels. Fat is quite nearly a lifesaving food group for me.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Just finished reading a book about a guy who normally had a high fat/high protein/moderate carb diet and he switched to low-fat, high carb 'healthy' foods for 90 days - the experiment was that he had to eat the same amount of sugar most people consume in a day in his country (I think he was Australian) but in HEALTHY form (ie: honey, maple syrup, or in 'healthy' foods like yogurt or granola bars). He at the same amount of calories as he normally did. And he ate 'healthy' foods, no junk. Not only did he gain tons of weight (I think 20 lbs over 90 days?) but it affected his liver quite dramatically. Same calories. Same exercise. Crazy! He quickly returned to his normal weight when he went back to his normal diet after the 90 days was up (and his liver went back to normal). Very intersting book. I think it's a documentary as well.
An example of what he ate before and after for breakfast:
Before - 3 eggs, bacon, spinach & avocado
After - high fibre, low-fat granola, juice, whole wheat toast w/jam
As you can see, for the 'after' he was not eating what people consider 'junk'. He was eating 'high fat' before. Yet it was the low fat/high sugar that increased his triglycerides, liver enzymes, insulin levels and weight.
Anyhow that is my long winded way of agreeing with you.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)its full of chemicals to boot.
It's not all white: The cocktail of up to 20 chemicals in a glass of milk
By DAVID DERBYSHIRE FOR MAILONLINE
UPDATED: 03:53 EST, 7 July 2011
A glass of milk can contain a cocktail of up to 20 painkillers, antibiotics and growth hormones, scientists have shown.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2012050/The-cocktail-20-chemicals-glass-milk.html
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Did you know it's highly likely the government is pumping a substance into your home the Germans used to poison thousands of allied troops?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_weapons_in_World_War_I#1915:_Large-scale_use_and_lethal_gases
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Who wants that with their corn flakes every morning? Jeez..
JI7
(89,245 posts)philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Unless you're under, say, under a year old. Or have a very accommodating wife/girlfriend/acquaintance.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)I could have made money off it, I would've booted my babies off the boob sooner and hauled out the pump, LOL.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)everything on Earth has a chemical composition. Everything we eat is a "chemical." I just never really know what people mean when they say there are chemicals in stuff. H20 is a fantastic chemical. Cow's milk is about 87% that chemical.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Reasons:
1. It tastes great
2. It has fat in it. So it tastes great
3. Vitamin A helps you see stuff
4. Good taste
5. Calcium good for bones
6. Vitamin D helps you absorb the calcium
7. That tasty milk fat helps you absorb the fat soluble vitamins A & D
8. Did I mention it tastes great.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)That stuff is yummy.
Ratty
(2,100 posts)As a whole milk chugger for many years I'd wanted to switch the skim for a long time but couldn't tolerate the thought of drinking that thin, blue, tasteless watery stuff. Then someone mentioned how good organic non-fat milk was and I was amazed to find they were right. I switched to that 5 or 6 years ago and never batted an eye.
Non-fat for the chugging but I still keep around a quart of the whole for cereal, oatmeal, cooking and the like. I think the whole milk fat is good for me in moderation.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I am also allergic to soy, corn, tomatoes, oats, strawberry, watermelon, lemon, natural vanilla, cayenne, and I think a few other minor things. I use almond milk after coconut milk did not sit well with me.
BainsBane
(53,029 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)In coffee, regular cheese. Choose where to put the fat, and calories.
Warpy
(111,240 posts)The cream floated to the top and if you wanted fatty milk, you just shook the bottle or carton to redistribute it. Most people skimmed off the cream for their coffee. What was left was lower in fat than homogenized milk and higher in fat than 2% and seemed to please everybody.
DebJ
(7,699 posts)never end.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Does that count?
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)"This shift in understanding has led to accusations that the Dietary Guidelines harmed those people who for years avoided fats -- as instructed -- and loaded up excessively (emphasis mine)on the carbohydrates in foods such as breads, cookies and cakes that were marketed as "low fat.""
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/10/06/for-decades-the-government-steered-millions-away-from-whole-milk-was-that-wrong/