General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGwyneth Paltrow: ‘Nobody is worth the money Robert Downey Jr. is worth’
Sorry, Goop, he is, obviously. He makes top dollar because his films do, too, for everyone else. She obviously isn't as bankable as he is. Simple economics.
There's also a small irony in her recipes calling for $50/oz. Manuka honey and such. How is anyone other than Robert Downey, Jr. expected to pay for Manuka honey if they aren't being paid like Downey?
Gwyneth Paltrow is calling out the wage disparity between the sexes in Hollywood, insisting no one is worth the salary her Iron Man co-star Robert Downey Jr. takes home.
The Oscar winner has joined Patricia Arquette, Meryl Streep and Reese Witherspoon, among others, who have voiced their concerns about the fair pay issue in Hollywood as leading men continue to pick up much bigger paychecks than their female co-stars.
Paltrow tells Variety, Your salary is a way to quantify what youre worth. If men are being paid a lot more for doing the same thing, it feels s.
-----------------------
According to editors at Forbes magazine, the actress earned $9 million over the past year, while Downey, Jr. raked in $80 million, making him the worlds highest-paid actor.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/people/2015/10/07/gwyneth-paltrow-nobody-is-worth-the-money-robert-downey-jr-is-worth/
valerief
(53,235 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)but hard to comprehend with some much principle involved.
valerief
(53,235 posts)money as megarich actor B?
People need money to survive, not to outdo each other.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)I was just trying to be clever using two separate definitions of 'principle' in one sentence.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)someone who has lived a life of luxury which she was born into, and didn't really have to struggle, like interestingly Downey did. So she says these really stupid things that you'd never hear Obama say.
I mean, I'd want to know of her, she was born into an entertainment industry family, and why doesn't EVERY child deserve to be born into families with such business connections, leading to $9M/year film careers that are basically part-time cameos.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I agree with the issue- a pay disparity is what it is. Symptomatic of valuing what men do much higher, simply out of tradition. but she is a poor spokeswoman for everything. born with a solver spoon and a foot in her mouth.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)She easily could request more if she wanted to. Plus how many movies did Robert do compared to her? The other thing is she likes to do independent films which don't pay as much. One other thing.....can she open a film? That is pretty important. If this was Sandra bullock, Jennifer Lawrence or Melissa McCarthy, I would sympathize with them. They open movies on their own.
Rex
(65,616 posts)To completely materialistic people, yes that is true. They define worth my superficial means only.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)It works for me.
As a quantifiable number it is a great indicator as it's hard to measure someone's compassion, or concern for the rabble and their commitment to talking about doing something to feign concern about the children unless I take them at face value, which I of course do not.
demmiblue
(36,824 posts)Even when a female actor is a huge draw, like Jennifer Lawrence, they are still paid less than their male co-stars.
All the rest is a bunch of goop.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)demmiblue
(36,824 posts)Even though women like her are paid millions, their experiences reflect what happens to all women on an everyday basis, especially minority women. Should they get agents?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)But Lawrence is one person negotiating in a competitive 'star' environment. She needs someone
that knows how much she is worth to a film production and can make the case that paying
her more is in their interest.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)What something may sound like does not particularly indicate what something is... our biases often compel us to reach into the 'it does not follow' fallacy to better validate themselves.
madville
(7,404 posts)She made 52 million the last year compared to Downey's 80 million. She was paid more than every other male actor on earth.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Women at every level get screwed.
progressoid
(49,951 posts)edhopper
(33,485 posts)(that is movies by the current Marvel Studio) and it was a big hit. They gave him a very big contract for future movies. As they continued to make movies they tied the actors to longer term contracts for less money. He makes more than the other Avengers actors.
Right place, right time.
I guarantee he didn't make mega bucks for The Judge
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)edhopper
(33,485 posts)Is that why they got rid of Howard for Cheadle?
reddread
(6,896 posts)with some other issues packed in as well.
at least according to the gossip around here.
edhopper
(33,485 posts)not flattering and says he was not kind to women as well.
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/lou-reed-monster-man-new-book-article-1.2392998
reddread
(6,896 posts)waaay back when.
salacious, unpleasant way to make money Im sure.
He's just lucky I let him have Laurie.
now I see the publicity for this one.
that money was just sitting there.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Angleae
(4,481 posts)There were a couple of Hulk moves earlier in the 2000s that ended up losing money not to mention a Captain America movie in 1990 that totally bombed.
edhopper
(33,485 posts)done by the Marvel Studio. Not just movies about Marvel characters.
Both Hulk movies made around $250 million, so they were successful or not, depending on the accounting involved.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Angleae
(4,481 posts)Marvel doesn't own the movie rights to Spider-Man, X-Men, and Fantastic Four and aren't likely to ever get them back.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)in American Hustle?
You really believe that the star of Hunger Games was less bankable than the men?
They paid her less because they could. As a young woman, she didn't know how much she was worth. But if simple economics were involved, she'd have been paid more than any of them men in that movie.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)She has to be able to bring a large enough audience to justify the pay.
From all that I know, the problem is that women just don't bring in as large audiences as men in movies. That might be from sexism (from both women and men), but companies want money, and why is it their fault that audiences are sexist?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)And Hunger Games is a billion dollar enterprise.
It's ridiculous to pretend that she wouldn't have justified a higher salary than Christian Bales -- IF the salaries were based on economics, uninfluenced by sexism.
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchises/
madville
(7,404 posts)Downey made 80 million and was #1, Jennifer Lawrence made 52 million and Jackie Chan was next at 50 million. So she did out earn every other man on earth at least, Downey is the only other person that made more in the last year.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Hunger Games movie she was only paid $10 million. She's finally getting paid what she's worth.
madville
(7,404 posts)Iron Man 3 made 1.2 Billion worldwide while Hunger Games Cathibg Fire made around 800 Million.
Downey making 80 million as a lead and her making 52 million are proportional by those box office numbers.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)And it's not like she's in some "must work or my children will starve" situation.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)to make less than they did.
She had to negotiate that salary in a vacuum and, as she has said, she didn't know how hard to push.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)Then she agreed to work for 10 million.
(I'm making up the exact number)
closeupready
(29,503 posts)(or whatever her American Hustle contract stipulated as her financial compensation.)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and the tough thing is, women already know that this is how it works. most employers plan to pay us less.
I have heard a few say it outright, but I don't think most bosses are stupid enough to behest about it anymore.
I remember when I was hiring they told me to throw out all the resumes from men, because they were going to pay peanuts.
so I could only afford to hire a woman.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Was it that blatant, and how big was the organization you hired for?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)because they thought he was really cool. Young, handsome, charming and oozing confidence. My boss loved gossiping with him. I had about 15 years experience (he had co-managed a pizzeria which failed, and had nothing to do with our industry) and they paid him almost as much as me. He absolutely was just winging it- couldn't tell when projects were easy and profitable or risky and time consuming. No clue at all about what the people he managed did all day, or when things were unnecessarily expensive. He planned to cajole and flirt good work out of people, LOL.
When I asked about why he'd command that salary w/ no experience- they said he needed more money to date because he was looking for a wife. Wish I was kidding. In reality, the boss just loved hanging out with him. It took him about six months of screw ups for them to dump him and hire someone who knew something about the business. That's when people talk about meritocracies or how businesses make the smartest decisions I have to laugh. People hire people who are "their kind" or "they'd like to have a beer with" more often than they hire actual talent or skill. It wasn't until I worked at a much larger place before I saw women with actually good jobs, actually managing men too. In smaller companies, that was unheard of, and I'm taking NYC, 15-25 years ago. Corporate companies having diversity pushed on them has made a huge difference.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)making a ton of money, there's no doubt that he deserves all that money.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)compared to people that aren't in the entertainment business?
I'm not taking issue with challenging the pay disparity, I'm taking issue with this idea: "Your salary is a way to quantify what youre worth".
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)She has to be thankful for that.
Googling Gwyneth Paltrow, she's worth $140 million. How can anyone complain about that?
Shoulders of Giants
(370 posts)But simple economics allows a man to make hundreds of millions from superhero movies while hundreds of millions of children go to bed hungry every night. Therefore, simple economics is evil.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)So the most money goes to the best game players, even if they have handicaps.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)the main pull of the show (which is Jim Parson's Sheldon character.) Jim Parsons, Johnny Galecki, and Kaley Cuoco get paid the same amount even though Jim Parsons is the big star of the show (and really the main character) while Galecki and Cuoco really just play the main supporting characters.
Sometimes what is unfair is not unfavorable.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)She's just complaining she's not as rich as Robert Downey, but she is still very rich.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)No one's running to see Ironman to check out what Pepper Potts is up to. Plus she's usually only in those movies for less than five minutes.
sub.theory
(652 posts)She's been wealthy her whole life. I admit I don't think too much of her either, because she has such an arrogant, holier-than-thou way about her, despite being hopelessly out of touch about life outside the world of the rich and famous.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)about not being paid enough money.
$9 million is more than most people will make in a lifetime.
Sounds to me like Paltrow and Downey need to be taxed a helluva lot more.
melman
(7,681 posts)I hate it when they do that. His last name is Downey, not Downey Jr!
closeupready
(29,503 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)I believe two of the biggest movies any woman has led since Sound of Music.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)They only made $1.5 billion. That would barely even buy a fleet of lear jets.
Dr. Strange
(25,917 posts)behind only Robert Downey Jr.
You don't make the big money until you prove your worth. Which is why Lawrence was paid "only" $500,000 for the first Hunger Games movie, unlike Downey who was paid "only" $500,000 for the first Iron Man movie.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I think she's awful.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)hearing someone who has never had to worry about money whine about money
Ex Lurker
(3,811 posts)If she had never worked a day in her life she could have lived off mommy and daddy's trust fund.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,824 posts)Or was that Cameron Diaz?
EX500rider
(10,810 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,824 posts)EX500rider
(10,810 posts)Annie
Sex Tape
The Other Woman
The Counselor
In a World...
Gambit
A Liar's Autobiography: The Untrue Story of Monty Python's Graham Chapman
What to Expect When You're Expecting
Bad Teacher
The Green Hornet
Knight and Day
Shrek Forever After
The Box
My Sister's Keeper
What Happens in Vegas
Shrek the Third
The Holiday
In Her Shoes
Shrek 2
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
Gangs of New York
Minority Report
My Father's House
The Sweetest Thing
Vanilla Sky
Shrek
The Invisible Circus
Charlie's Angels
Things You Can Tell Just by Looking at Her
Any Given Sunday
Being John Malkovich
Man Woman Film
Very Bad Things
There's Something About Mary
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
A Life Less Ordinary
My Best Friend's Wedding
Keys to Tulsa
Head Above Water
Feeling Minnesota
She's the One
The Last Supper
The Mask
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,824 posts)I actually do know the difference between the two actresses. I'm just being snarky about Gwyneth's semi-remarkable career. She's okay but I'm betting she probably gets mostly parts Diaz (and Jennifer Aniston, Reese Witherspoon, etc.) turn down.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Like Johnny Depp made Jack Sparrow his own, RDJ made Iron Man his franchise. Fans won't accept anyone else playing those characters, which gives him ultimate leverage over the studios if he threatens to walk. Not just from Iron Man, he is also top billing in Avengers, which makes $1bn-$2bn per movie.
That's why those two are way ahead of their coworkers in earnings.
reddread
(6,896 posts)I can only imagine RD Jr was mortified by the pile of crap they passed off as IM3
that director should be hunted and killed for reals.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)The unending sequels and reboots are tiresome.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Does anyone think guys like Chris Cooper, David Strathairn, and Toby Jones make even 5 million a picture?
And as far as Meryl Streep goes, if she took 50 milllion a picture, her films wouldn't get made. They are not box office gold, they are made to get critical acclaim and win Oscars.
Meanwhile, Gweneth is a horrible actress. Besides Iron Man, I don't even know what she's doing and couldn't care less. She's always been a whiny little brat and comes off as full of herself in every interview. She's not a star anymore and she's realizing it.
Actresses are going to start negotiating harder, and that's the advantage here.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)fired from Ally McBeal. He deserves every penny he is paid for that accomplishment. Where was Paltrow when Downey was here?
U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)I remember when he was arrested in that motel room & it brought to mind his role in Less Than Zero.
I'm glad he made it out of that hell.
randome
(34,845 posts)But when it comes from someone who promotes 'vagina steaming', I'd prefer that she simply go away and retire to her own mansion.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
Mendocino
(7,482 posts)In the reply title is the tiniest violin in the world playing for all the poor poor celebrities.
Throd
(7,208 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)demands to include his wife and other concessions.
Now, I love the movie and think Roy Scheider was great in the role but to this day Friedkin laments not getting McQueen and undervaluing how much one Steve McQueen close-up is to selling a movie.
Sorry but simple economics rule these movies. When Paltrow starts making mega blockbusters that pull in billions world wide she too will be paid huge sums. I am more concerned about the disparity for female vs. male directors than I am actors.
meaculpa2011
(918 posts)Roy Scheider was great.
Steve McQueen was transcendent and would have elevated the film to "classic" status.
Actors are a dime a dozen. Whiny actors with super rich show-biz parents are a dime a gross, and I'm probably underestimating.
Movie stars are very, very rare.
Female director, like female actors, negotiate their own deals. You want more. Demand more.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I last saw it several decades ago.
it still holds up as good movie after all these years. I was really struck by how good McQueen was as an actor.
meaculpa2011
(918 posts)at the Sunrise Drive-In 45 years (?) ago.
They tell me there was a great car chase scene.
I wouldn't know.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)meaculpa2011
(918 posts)We got married in 1972 and our first child arrived in 1990. Second in 1993.
Lesson 1: Parenting is for young people.
Lesson 2: Parenting is life without parole.
P.S. I just got back from running an errand with my Little Angel.
Ring... Hi Dad, what are you doing?
I'm working.
That's nice. Pick me up in five minutes, I have to........
kwassa
(23,340 posts)so far, I don't regret the decision.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)that much, except in The Great Escape, but most moviegoers DID love him. I like the original Wages of Fear, Henri-Georges Clouzot, but the remake was even better, IMO.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I do think Friedkin found a way to a more universal story. I too would rather have seem Scheider in a movie than McQueen but Hollywood thought differently.
I remember walking into Sorcerer in a theater a couple minutes late and everything was in French and we wondered if we had walked into the wrong movie. Was my first exposure to Tangerine Dream and such a dark, dark story.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I thought that Sorcerer was an odd movie, maybe even quirky.
But, I didn't know that Friedkin wanted McQueen in that movie.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I keep watching Papillon when it runs on the local version of TMC. Unfortunately it is in french but I can still study the face. My french sucks so it helps I know the movie well.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)something seems to be lacking. Like proper grammar.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)Jack Nicholson received a percentage of the gross on the film, and due to its massive box-office took home around $60 million. As of 2003 it is still the single-movie record for actor's salary.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
How about that...150 million for one film in 2015?...(perhaps more depending how one measures inflation) It had to do with a percentage of the profits..
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096895/trivia
I might add..that is nothing compared to the interest alone that some multi billion worth people get on investments in one year.