Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDrone War Exposed: Jeremy Scahill on U.S. Kill Program's Secrets & the Whistleblower Who Leaked Them
Drone War Exposed: Jeremy Scahill on U.S. Kill Program's Secrets & the Whistleblower Who Leaked ThemDemocracy Now!
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: One of the most secretive military campaigns in U.S. history is under the microscope like never before. In a major exposé based on leaked government documents, The Intercept has published the most in-depth look at the U.S. drone assassination program to date. "The Drone Papers" exposed the inner workings of how the drone war is waged, from how targets are identified to who decides to kill. They reveal a number of flaws, including that strikes have resulted in large part from electronic communications data, or "signals intelligence," that officials acknowledge is unreliable. The documents also undermine government claims that the drone strikes have been precise. During one five-month period of an operation in Afghanistan, nine out of 10 casualties were not the intended target. And among other revelations, the documents also corroborate previous reports that all foreign males in a target zone have been treated as militantsunless they are proven innocent after death.
JEREMY SCAHILL: Oh, yeah. I mean, look, and thisyou know, really, we know so much more about this because of the Edward Snowden leaks, but so much of the entire intelligence-industrial complex in theyou know, sort of in the U.S. empire is dependent upon intercepting peoples emails, their text messages, their phone calls. And, you know, signals intelligence can be reliable. I mean, if Im talking to you, Juan, they can do our voice recognition. They can say, "OK, we know that Jeremy Scahill is talking to Juan González." But when you talk to people who really worked in that worldCora Currier and I interviewed Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who was the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the top official running all of the Pentagon spy operations around the world, and he was Stanley McChrystals top intelligence guy at JSOC, the Joint Special Operations Command. When Cora and I spoke to him, he said, "Look, I can record my voice on a phone and give it to a courier. The courier can go somewhere else, then call a number, and they can play that, and someones going to die over there, and theyll think that theyve eliminated this target, but they didnt." And so, you know, itsand he said, signals intelligence is very easy to fool.
JEREMY SCAHILL: Oh, yeah. I mean, look, and thisyou know, really, we know so much more about this because of the Edward Snowden leaks, but so much of the entire intelligence-industrial complex in theyou know, sort of in the U.S. empire is dependent upon intercepting peoples emails, their text messages, their phone calls. And, you know, signals intelligence can be reliable. I mean, if Im talking to you, Juan, they can do our voice recognition. They can say, "OK, we know that Jeremy Scahill is talking to Juan González." But when you talk to people who really worked in that worldCora Currier and I interviewed Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who was the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the top official running all of the Pentagon spy operations around the world, and he was Stanley McChrystals top intelligence guy at JSOC, the Joint Special Operations Command. When Cora and I spoke to him, he said, "Look, I can record my voice on a phone and give it to a courier. The courier can go somewhere else, then call a number, and they can play that, and someones going to die over there, and theyll think that theyve eliminated this target, but they didnt." And so, you know, itsand he said, signals intelligence is very easy to fool.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 544 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drone War Exposed: Jeremy Scahill on U.S. Kill Program's Secrets & the Whistleblower Who Leaked Them (Original Post)
portlander23
Oct 2015
OP
bananas
(27,509 posts)1. k&r nt
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)2. Why those dirty terrorists!
Who would ever think to record his voice then play it back later at a different location? That's just so sneaky! And since actually tracking down these guys physically is too much work, we're fine with blowing up random places we think they might be at. That's called "intelligence" work. Sort of like how we call it "justice" when our team of assassins bursts in and shoots up a place and actually (allegedly) gets one of our targets.
Historians in future generations will be left to shake their collective heads at our styling ourselves as "civilized."
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)3. and a k & r. n/t