Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeb Bush’s field campaign in Iowa doesn’t know how to measure its own failure
http://americablog.com/tag/rachel-maddowAs Ive written before, Jeb Bushs field campaign isnt exactly a juggernaut, but even its meager ten-person staff and two offices Iowa is a bigger investment than most of his rivals. However, as Ive also written before, if Republican campaigns are going to get serious about field, theyd do well to stop measuring their success in calls made and start measuring it in conversations theyve actually had with voters. 1,281 supporters out of 70,381 calls is about what youd expect given a 20% contact rate if Jebs internal polling has him at nine percent among Iowa Republicans. This wouldnt be an unreasonable assumption, especially since 70,000 dials at a 20% contact rate and 9% support would equal 1,260, exactly the number of supporters the campaign says its confident it has. But if Jebs campaign wants to measure how voters are responding to his campaigns ground-level messaging, instead of measuring empty dials, theyd do well to report what is likely closer to 14,000 phone conversations.
Furthermore, 70,000 dials in the state that will cast the nations first votes isnt all that much for a campaign thats existed for 136 days, as Jebs has, and its even less for a ten person staff. Even assuming that his staff has only been on the ground for 70 days, or just about half that time, thats only 100 dials per day per staffer (100 x 10 x 70 = 70,000). One good volunteer should be able to knock that out in two hours; a full-time staffer should be able to get through them even more quickly. Which leads to the question of what his staff is doing with the other six hours to ten hours in the campaign workday because, again, it doesnt appear to be knocking doors or organizing volunteers.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 561 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush’s field campaign in Iowa doesn’t know how to measure its own failure (Original Post)
eridani
Oct 2015
OP
brush
(53,743 posts)1. I agree with most everything in your post
However, having phone banking experience on campaigns, it's not likely you'll get through 100 answered calls in two hours.
There are hang-ups, nobody home, numbers no longer current, people on there way out of the door, deceased people, and then when you do reach a person, it \takes time to get through your scripted message and, hopefully have a short conversation that will persuade them to go out and vote for your candidate on primary day.
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)2. 100 calls in two hours is not realistic.
I made phone calls during both Obama campaigns. Getting in 50 calls in an hour would be a very high amount.
That said, I think Jeb! always planned to give little attention to Iowa. Republican caucus goers in Iowa are generally of the loony John Bircher type.