General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHelp me out understand this, DU! Why are we still allies with Saudi Arabia??
Considering their horible laws and persecution of minorities and of most basic human rights, why are they our allies?
Oil? Is that all it takes for us to consider such a country an ally?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I can't figure it out for the life of me.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Why indeed?
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)inanna
(3,547 posts)951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)but they're considered our enemies.
According to the BBC, the Iranian regime recently made sexual reassignment even more accessible by announcing that health insurance companies must cover the full cost of sex-change operations, which can cost upward of $3,000.
Iran performs more sex-change operations than any country in the world except for Thailand; the surgery industry has attracted patients from all over the Middle East and as far away as Eastern Europe. Official statistics for 2007 put the number of transsexuals in Iran between 15,000 and 20,000 people, with unofficial estimates suggesting many more -- up to 150,000, the Guardian reports.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/04/iran-sex-change-operation_n_1568604.html
OTOH in Saudi Arabia the only thing you're getting chopped off free of charge is your head if you come out.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)So what's the reason SA are still allies? Is it the oil or something else?
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)KSA, head chopped off, Iran, hanged, not much of a choice..
trillion
(1,859 posts)for unbecomming behavior that turned me off to them. I'm happy I've finally forgotten one of the girls that made the western news' name.
trillion
(1,859 posts)so they allow people to get the surgery. Basically, if a gay man wants to keep his genitals, he's likely to get executed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Iran
"Any type of sexual activity outside a heterosexual marriage is forbidden. Transsexuality in Iran is legal if accompanied by a sex change operation,"
"Sodomy (lavat) can in certain circumstances be a crime for which both partners can be punished by death. "
"The punishment for lesbianism (mosahegheh) involving persons who are mature, of sound mind, and consenting, is 50 lashes. If the act is repeated three times and punishment is enforced each time, the death sentence will apply on the fourth occasion."
Behind the Aegis
(53,940 posts)While Iran's policy in regards to transgender issues revolving around sex reassignment is admirable, it's policy on homosexuality is
Penalty: For men 74 lashes for immature men and death penalty for mature men of sound mind and is consenting. For women 50 lashes for women of mature sound mind and is consenting. Death penalty offense after fourth conviction.[38]
It doesn't vary too much from Saudi Arabia:
Penalty: Prison sentences of several months to life, fines and/or whipping/flogging, castration, torture or death can be sentenced on first conviction. A second conviction merits execution.[38]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_by_country_or_territory#Asia
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)It's either the surgery or execution.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Such as this: http://mic.com/articles/89913/the-media-claims-iranian-actress-leila-hatami-is-about-to-be-flogged-but-here-s-the-real-story where she repeatedly bashes "Western Media" for reporting on the fact that an Iranian actress was threatened with punishment for kissing a man on the cheek at the Cannes Film Festival.
She ended the article by saying this:
and this
http://mic.com/articles/78597/why-every-american-should-take-their-next-vacation-in-iran
and this
http://mic.com/articles/74599/what-the-media-is-getting-wrong-about-the-iranian-rockers-murdered-in-brooklyn
The media framed this story as the tragic loss of aspiring Iranian rockers who escaped oppression and persecution in an effort to pursue their dreams in a free society.
But there were two serious flaws with this narrative. Firstly, the notion that Iran is a tyrannical regime, that the only way to live in Iran is to survive it, as Farrell suggests, is blatantly false. Though there are rules in place that deny artists full freedom of expression, there is also a strong network of support for artists in Iran galleries and private spaces that back artists and musicians while circumnavigating the rules of the regime. And in fact, there are thousands of musicians in Iran, not just performing underground, but also in public, and the art scene is not only present, but thriving.
The individual using the pen name or nom de plume of "Sasha von Oldershausen" is clearly putting out Iranian propaganda in various American publications such as PolicyMic, The Huffington Post, The New York Times and New York Magazine. Since 2012 shes rotated though so many well known publications spreading pro-regime propaganda.
Mrs "Oldershausen" who is of Iranian descent, attended the University of Tehran a year before she began her mission of writing articles that put the tyrannical regime in a positive light.
No where in any of her articles that I've seen will you find any mention of Iran's ill-treatment for religious minorities, gays, etc.
I apologize for posting an article that was authored by what appears to be a mouth piece for the Iranian regime, I am clearly ignorant on the issue of how the LGBT community are treated in that region, I only posted out that article because it gave the appearance that Iran was the only nation that was mildly progressive.
Steven the Somnolent
(36 posts)They got yer "persecution of minorities and of most basic human rights" right there!
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)How did you even draw the conclusion that the two can be compared? I don't agree with many of Israel's decisions and actions, but you can't compare them with SA.
Steven the Somnolent
(36 posts)S/he won't compare Israel to Saudi Arabia. There's another country.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I might not know what's going on in Israel. Care to elaborate? (Aside from the Palestine conflict, what else us happening? We can't talk Israel Palestine conflict in GD)
newthinking
(3,982 posts)nt
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)That would explain it.
$$$$$$$$$$ from weapon sales.
I didn't know.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)They prefer the "stability" of a regime that's directly and indirectly supported most of the Islamist terror in the world to trying something that might actually work. They might get called nasty names for trying something new, rather than failing in the tried and true way.*
*Obama's the one partial exception. He's willing to push the boundaries of what's possible. Whether it will prove to be enough will require time.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Why are we allies and protecting them so much? Why aren't we demanding them to step up and take lead in the war against DAESH?
Other posters above said we sold them weapons.
Could it be that just money is involved in our alliance?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)are bad - You ought to see the people who would replace them if they lost power.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)They behead people for merely speaking their mind. They have 0 tolerance for minorities. Its a sick society.
We shouldn't consider them allies.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)power - or else it might break into extremely horrific tribal war.
I didn't think it was possible that the situation in Iraq could could possible get worse than Saddam Hussein - but it did.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Only because a worse regime could take over.
Thats messed up.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Having dominant influence over the flow of oil through the Arabian Gulf has been a U.S. strategic objective since FDR
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)and Egypt. We are likely propping up the least horrible government they can get in those countries.
NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)they're our "allies!" (because the alternative is worse.
and when talking about geopolitical diplomacy, there's always a 'worse'.)
remember this kiddies, the saudi gov't is seen as too liberal and corrupted by the west. that means the alternative active power structure/s within the populace is being placed in check. you might find a similar situation in our own backyard, if you're paying attention.
"apres moi, c'est deluge."
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)1) It's in the US's economic interest.
2) They're a force for stability in the ME. Exceptionally brutal, repressive stability, but still stability. It's precisely the same argument that is often raised to explain why removing Saddam was a bad idea.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)What stability?? Weren't some of the 911 terrorists from SA???
A HERETIC I AM
(24,365 posts)If the ruling family was removed in what is seen as the birthplace of Islam. Just how stable do you think it would be if the various sects and denominations of Islam were essentially cut loose to fight it
out for control of Mecca?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Since some of the 911 terrorists were from there.
They're a terrorist breading ground.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,365 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)does not mean it is not stable - that's a different issue.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)How do you explain the beheadings?? "Different issues" as well ??
Yikes.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)If it was stable there would be no Daesh. And you might notice that there is.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)That's what will result when the House of Saud burns down.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)So is Assad.
So was Saddam Hussein.
So was Muammar Qaddafi.
I don't think "stability" is one of our goals.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Is it your view that removing Saddam Hussein was a good idea?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)He ran desert shield and desert storm because of Iraq invading Kuwait.
But his ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had indicated that we had no interest in the relations between Iraq and Kuwait, clearing the way for Hussein's invasion.
We should not have been in that area, should not have invaded.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)We are left with, it is in the financial inerests of tptb.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Everything we stand for - they're against.
They create the extremists - we fight them.
Everybody wins.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Sarcasm tag missing
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Without all the endless wars, terrorism and mass surveillance we'd probably just waste our money on frivolous things like education, infrastructure, supporting veterans, adequate mental healthcare etc.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Or is it "Marhabben"?
trillion
(1,859 posts)for equal rights. I believe there are over 180 people that they are going to behead and hang upside down on a cross for 3 days, that were arrested at the equal rights protest. And, yes, this is what they were actually sentenced to and it's going to happen any day now. Barf.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)She and her coworkers were cordially 'invited' to the beheadings and amputations. They were actually proud to have these Canadian foreigners witness their brand of justice. She still labels it the worst country she's ever worked in .... and she's been, literally, all around the world.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The undisputed anus mundi.
Given the choice of exile to KSA or North Korea, I'd choose NK in a heartbeat, Kim Jong Cartman and all. At least there I could get knee-walking drunk on soju and try to forget I was in North Korea
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Enough said.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Listen I'm not that far off if you think about it.
and the Bush Crime Family
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Saudi's keep the oil on the us dollar which allows the us to basically 'print' oil. If the standard ever changed from the $ - the US economy would collapse.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and go it alone without suppressing its own citizens, using up its fighting men and women and laying waste to other parts of the world.
There is another agenda at work, one which puts other interests ahead of Americans.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)but that's not as easy and profitable for the people in charge.
BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)Link in dutch, Makes the point Saudi-Arabia sponsors the radical form of sunni islam using petrodollars. Question "don't we need a clean oil campagn?"
An open letter to Hollande about the use of Bush rhetoric went viral as well.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)And, unlike Iran, we have influence in Saudi Arabia.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)eom
Xolodno
(6,390 posts)Iran gave the US the boot and wants nothing to do with the US. The other major regional player in the area was the house of Saud...and the US want's a footprint in the area, so they deal with the devil that's willing to play ball.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And they have oil.
So we are "allies" with the worst country/worst culture on earth.
The O'Jays got this:
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Again, why are we still Allies with a terrorist breeding ground country??