Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 01:08 PM Nov 2015

In California, Stingy Water Users Are Fined in Drought, While the Rich Soak

APPLE VALLEY, Calif. — Outside her two-story tract home in this working-class town, Debbie Alberts, a part-time food service worker, has torn out most of the lawn. She has given up daily showers and cut her family’s water use nearly in half, to just 178 gallons per person each day.

A little more than 100 miles west, a resident of the fashionable Los Angeles hills has been labeled “the Wet Prince of Bel Air” after drinking up more than 30,000 gallons of water each day — the equivalent of 400 toilet flushes each hour with two showers running constantly, with enough water left over to keep the lawn perfectly green.

Only one of them has been fined for excessive water use: Ms. Alberts.

Luis Uribe, an owner of a landscaping company, spreading decomposed granite on a yard in Culver City. J.S. Gilbert at his home in South San Francisco, where he installed a low-flow toilet after a friend repeatedly told him that he needed to replace his old one because it used too much water.

Four years into the worst drought in California’s recorded history, the contrast between the strict enforcement on Californians struggling to conserve and the unchecked profligacy in places like Bel Air has unleashed anger and indignation — among both the recipients of the fines, who feel helpless to avoid them, and other Californians who see the biggest water hogs getting off scot-free.

The top 10 residential water users in Los Angeles collectively used more than 80 million gallons of water in the year that ended April 1. The “Wet Prince” topped the list at 11.8 million gallons during that time — enough for about 90 typical California families — at an estimated cost of $90,000, as first reported by the California-based Center for Investigative Reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/us/stingy-water-users-in-fined-in-drought-while-the-rich-soak.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In California, Stingy Water Users Are Fined in Drought, While the Rich Soak (Original Post) Blue_Tires Nov 2015 OP
Its screwed up GummyBearz Nov 2015 #1
Sounds like local laws to me. Maybe the state needs to pass something. yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #2
178 gallons/person/day is about 178% of the nation's average maxsolomon Nov 2015 #3
Xposted to California group KamaAina Nov 2015 #4
 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
1. Its screwed up
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 02:00 PM
Nov 2015

I have a lot of friends who own homes in working class areas, and the personal stories I see on facebook day after day are ridiculous. One friend who obeys the rationing rules got charged over $500 randomly one month. He called to complain that there must be a mistake only to get all kinds of resistance from the water department. It took non-stop badgering on his part to get them to check the meter... sure enough it wasn't calibrated right (just using a bit of logic - there are no leaks, how does your water bill go up $400+?)

There was apparently so many people with the similar complaints that the water department for the city even had an open forum with a full staff of workers so people could take their bills and get it settled at the same time... the venue was packed.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. Sounds like local laws to me. Maybe the state needs to pass something.
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 02:01 PM
Nov 2015

178 gallons of water per person per day seems like a lot to me.

maxsolomon

(33,316 posts)
3. 178 gallons/person/day is about 178% of the nation's average
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 02:29 PM
Nov 2015

that's got to be wrong. I mean, I hope that's wrong and not CA's idea of conservation.

there are homes being built that bring use down to 28g/person/day.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In California, Stingy Wat...