General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Return of the 1920s
<snip>
But when Obama speaks of what is not American, countless citizens wonder: Who is he to judge what is not American? The United States is wracked by a spasm of anti-cosmopolitanism and fear of radical subversion. It is exemplified, for many Americans by the election and presidency of Obama himself: black, yet biracially cosmopolitan, urban, intellectual, raised partly in a Muslim country, and the abandoned son of a Kenyan activist and academic. Millions of conservatives still suspect him of being un-Christian and, literally, not a native-born American qualified to serve as president. That Obamas election occurred simultaneously with the largest economic contraction since the Great Depression exacerbated these cultural tensions. The current conflict is a continuation of one over the past century in the United States between what the historian Gary Gerstle has called the racial nationalism of blood and ethnic supremacy and a more expansive civic nationalism which promises a common political project of equal rights and respect for all. America has seen expressions of both racial and civic nationalism in its historyboth are quintessentially American articulations of political power and hierarchy. Yet these different national projectsone culturally and ethnically homogeneous, the other inclusive of differences, yet seeking to subsume them into a Party of America, in political theorist Rogers Smiths wordsboth risk canceling out a third strain of American nationalism. They contend with a paradoxically de-nationalized pluralism of countless hyphenated Americans whose sub-communities do not cohere into a generous polity larger than the sum of its parts.
There is no period of American history that so pervasively demonstrated the power of ethno-nationalism to suppress pluralist differences as that following the Russian Revolution, the end of the First World War, and then continuing through much of the 1920s. There are many broad parallels between this era and our own. In both historical moments, there is a rising racial nationalism that takes hold of a significant (and demographically similar) portion of the country. Following the 1920s, Franklin Roosevelts leadership during the Depression and a massive labor movementwhich, at least, in its ideals (if often not its practice) extolled the social solidarity of Americans of all races, ethnicities, and religionsrenewed civic nationalism. So, too, did the total mobilization on behalf of prosecuting the Second World War. But civic nationalism, too, was still flawed by institutional racism, and dependent upon extra-national enemiesfirst German and Japanese totalitarianism and then Soviet communismto somewhat unify the American political culture. What might we expect to, first, culminate, and, then, follow, the moment of Trump?
<big snip>
In only two respects are the ethno-nationalists today in a better structural political position than were the supporters of the 1924 Immigration Actbut they are significant. First, during the 1920s, the vast, anti-immigrant white Protestant population was divided between the Democratic and Republican Parties. Millions of Northern and Midwestern rural and small-town white Protestantsscathingly depicted in the novels of Sinclair Lewiswere Republicans. Millions of Southern rural and small town white Protestants were still members of the party of Democracy, the Democrats, whose Jim Crow restrictions had made it the sole, dominant party of Southern white supremacy. The clashing between parties thus sometimes divided demographically similar voting blocs along partisan and regional lines.
Today, however, white Protestants overwhelmingly support the Republican Party. If the 39 percent of voters in 2012 who identified as white Protestants had been the only citizens permitted to vote, their 69 percent support of Mitt Romney would have given him, by far, the largest landslide in U.S. history. Evangelical white Protestants supported Romney by an even higher 78 percent. In all, about 42 percent of Romneys voters identified themselves as white evangelicals. The political weight of white Protestantsthe long-dominant group of Americans most threatened by changes in racial and ethnic demography, gender norms, and cultural modernismnow lies predominantly in a single party. Representative Steve King of Iowa and Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, both ardently opposed to immigration, would likely have found themselves on opposite sides of the political fence a century ago.
<snip>
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/the-return-of-the-1920s/422163/