General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBest newspaper correction ever
Found on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/guardianstyle/status/682972002790060033?s=09
lpbk2713
(42,755 posts)Thanks but no thanks.
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)nxylas
(6,440 posts)I haven't figured out yet how to copy and paste URLs of pictures directly from Twitter's Android app.
lpbk2713
(42,755 posts)Not saying anything derogatory about you or what you did. It's just my habit to not go where
I don't know what to expect; lots of cookies, loud video ads, etc. Thanks for the clarification.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)I hoped that the subject line and URL would at least give an idea of what to expect. I don't click on links where I have no clue what I'm supposed to be looking at either.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Cheers.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Almost a century ago, Robert Goddard was working on developing rockets that could ascend to the upper atmosphere and, much more important, reach such destinations as the Moon and Mars. After The New York Times carried a news story about his work, the paper ran an editorial (January 13, 1920) ridiculing the idea. It stated in part:
The Times ran what it titled "A Correction" on July 17, 1969. The day before, Apollo 11 had been launched toward the Moon, using Goddard's method (he was the first to build a liquid-fueled rocket, the technology still used today). In its correction, the Times summarized its 1920 editorial, then stated:
These quotations, and more information about skepticism about Goddard's work, can be found in his Wikipedia bio.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)I didn't even know he was I'll.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)little help, so the parents of a couple of our grandkids bought me a t-shirt that says,
"Let's eat Grandma."
"Let's eat, Grandma."
(Grammar saves lives.)
nxylas
(6,440 posts)(I wish I could take credit for that, but I stole it from Facebook).