Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:43 PM Jan 2016

CNN: White militiamen aren’t a threat like black protesters because ‘they’re not looting anything'

CNN analyst: White militiamen aren’t a threat like black protesters because ‘they’re not looting anything’

.............
Roderick told CNN host Brian Stelter on Sunday that law enforcement should not react with force to end the militia’s occupation of the federal building.

“The last thing we need is some type of large confrontation because that’s when stuff goes bad,” Roderick explained. “And I think in this particular instance, if we just wait them out, see what they’ve got to say, then eventually, they’re all going to go home.”

Stelter pointed out that many activists had complained if the militia members were “Black Lives Matter protesters or if these were peaceful Muslim Americans then they would be treated very differently by law enforcement.”

“This is a very rural area,” Roderick replied. “It is out in the middle of nowhere. What are they actually doing? They’re not destroying property, they’re not looting anything.”

................


More plus video:
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/cnn-analyst-white-militiamen-arent-a-threat-like-black-protesters-because-theyre-not-looting-anything/#.VomFbavirEs.twitter

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN: White militiamen aren’t a threat like black protesters because ‘they’re not looting anything' (Original Post) kpete Jan 2016 OP
Seizing nd holding federal property at gunpoint. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #1
I think breaking into a building and declaring it your own goes beyond looting. Bjorn Against Jan 2016 #2
It's At Least Equivalent ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #38
What they meant is "Its not like they are colored and running around breaking glass and stuff." LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #3
What he meant is "rural=whites, urban = blacks" n/t dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #22
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy awake Jan 2016 #4
Enforce the law. Jim Beard Jan 2016 #18
they just stole the building. nashville_brook Jan 2016 #5
Was it a trailer park? JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #31
They're just seizing public property and seeking DirkGently Jan 2016 #6
Aren't they allied with the group that deployed snipers to deter Federal agents? Babel_17 Jan 2016 #7
Yep. Led by some of the same. DirkGently Jan 2016 #12
Thank you for that Babel_17 Jan 2016 #14
yup, best tactic is to give them minimal attention and starve them out Amishman Jan 2016 #61
Also, two of that group later shot two cops who were eating lunch Midnight Writer Jan 2016 #48
AND a Good Guy with a Gun! jmowreader Jan 2016 #49
I wonder what happens when the regular employees need to show up for work. n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #8
Well, the regular employees have been told to stay away HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #19
I don't see any benefit to sending in Feds with guns blazing. Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #9
I agree with you to a point passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #39
Shut off all utilities OnlinePoker Jan 2016 #43
They just murder police RandiFan1290 Jan 2016 #10
Amazing how our so called media Wellstone ruled Jan 2016 #11
they just "looted" a federal facility ... etherealtruth Jan 2016 #13
Yes they did and people here are saying they should be treated differently! Jim Beard Jan 2016 #17
There's a reason for that jmowreader Jan 2016 #50
Quite a few DUers have expressed a very similar and equally odious sentiment Number23 Jan 2016 #15
True. For a progressive/liberal/Democratic site SwankyXomb Jan 2016 #34
hear, hear! nt Stellar Jan 2016 #41
Like McVeigh malaise Jan 2016 #16
McVeigh was executed. 1939 Jan 2016 #62
On another blog someone tried to defend sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #20
another example of gun humping cowards being catered to Skittles Jan 2016 #21
Oh dear God. SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #23
And yet some still think CNN has some kind of liberal leanings...no, never. Rex Jan 2016 #24
Sickening n/t Oilwellian Jan 2016 #25
I just spent my evening covering the Tamir Rice vigil in City Heights nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #26
kick Blue_Tires Jan 2016 #27
I think a trip through the building they're squatting in Warpy Jan 2016 #28
The stupidity Dretownblues Jan 2016 #29
welcome to du niyad Jan 2016 #36
The Oregon terrorists are attempting to put the government in a no-win position. Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2016 #30
step 2 doesn't really apply passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #42
This whole thing just gets weirder and weirder. Initech Jan 2016 #32
Remember the Occupy Wall Street encampments? JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #33
Horse manure libodem Jan 2016 #35
Pure B.S. lark Jan 2016 #37
It's like a sit-in, but with guns. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #40
Facepalm... GoCubsGo Jan 2016 #44
it's TEH stupid, GoCubsGo Skittles Jan 2016 #51
I wonder what his username on DU is. Chakab Jan 2016 #45
I DAMN WELL GUARANGAWDDAMNTEE YOU!!!! MohRokTah Jan 2016 #46
I totally read this sentence wrong the first time: Lucky Luciano Jan 2016 #47
God the selective definitions KILL ME JackInGreen Jan 2016 #52
Hilarious Depaysement Jan 2016 #53
they are "looting" the public's right to the park treestar Jan 2016 #54
typical american heaven05 Jan 2016 #55
Just Heard on the Stephanie Miller Show: Beowulf42 Jan 2016 #56
If there isn't any water, and there isn't any heat, and there isn't any power they will be borrowing lonestarnot Jan 2016 #57
how about this scenario? NoMoreRepugs Jan 2016 #58
from the SPLC to further make my case NoMoreRepugs Jan 2016 #59
No looting JLTaylor Jan 2016 #60
Racists gona racist. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #63
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. Seizing nd holding federal property at gunpoint.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:50 PM
Jan 2016

Terrorism, right there.

Treat them like any other terrorist.

ProfessorGAC

(64,995 posts)
38. It's At Least Equivalent
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jan 2016

Looting would be breaking into a building and taking stuff and declaring it your own. Not understanding how anybody could reason that this is any different. They're still declaring ownership of something that isn't their's to own.

awake

(3,226 posts)
4. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:54 PM
Jan 2016

Check out this thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027494920

"f two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384 "

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
6. They're just seizing public property and seeking
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jan 2016

armed confrontation with the government of the United States is all.

No money has been harmed!

/

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
7. Aren't they allied with the group that deployed snipers to deter Federal agents?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jan 2016

Is this a different group, or is that not relevant?

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
12. Yep. Led by some of the same.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:15 PM
Jan 2016


Among the occupiers is Ammon Bundy, son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, and two of his brothers. Militia members at the refuge claimed they had as many as 100 supporters with them. The refuge, federal property managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend.

In phone interviews from inside the occupied building Saturday night, Ammon Bundy and his brother, Ryan Bundy, said they are not looking to hurt anyone. But they would not rule out violence if police tried to remove them, they said.

"The facility has been the tool to do all the tyranny that has been placed upon the Hammonds," Ammon Bundy said.


http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2016/01/drama_in_burns_ends_with_quiet.html



Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
14. Thank you for that
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:37 PM
Jan 2016

So these people use military tactics, and are ready to shoot it out. Arguably, we don't want them setting the pace for how this unfolds.

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
61. yup, best tactic is to give them minimal attention and starve them out
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jan 2016

they crave confrontation with authority.

post enough guards to keep anyone from giving them food, request the media keep their distance, and wait for them to get hungry and give up. Gather as much info as possible on who was in there, and track them down and arrest individually once they disperse.

Midnight Writer

(21,745 posts)
48. Also, two of that group later shot two cops who were eating lunch
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 03:22 AM
Jan 2016

So the threat of violence here has to be taken seriously, even it is caused by a "loose cannon".

You've got 150 people who think it is a keen idea to grab their guns, invade a public park, and threaten a violent confrontation with anyone who tries to stop them.

I think it is a safe bet that there is someone in there who would like nothing more than to go down in a blaze of glory.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
49. AND a Good Guy with a Gun!
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:11 AM
Jan 2016

A concealed weapons permit holder decided to use a Second Amendment Solution to stop Jerad Miller, and wound up getting his shit blown away by Amanda Miller.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
19. Well, the regular employees have been told to stay away
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:03 PM
Jan 2016

another thread says they'll work from alternate sites, work by internet or go on administrative leave.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
9. I don't see any benefit to sending in Feds with guns blazing.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:01 PM
Jan 2016

Waiting it out over days or weeks may not be an attractive strategy for those used to 2 hour Hollywood movies but it is the approach least likely to result in new widows and orphans. And I think Loretta Lynch would adopt the same approach for any group of protesters occupying such a Federal building, regardless of their skin color or religion.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
39. I agree with you to a point
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jan 2016

But how long a wait is acceptable. A month? Three months? A year? They say they are equipped to stay for years (and plan on it)...so who takes care of the property maintenance, and handling the business of the refuge. The refuge is officially closed now and will remain so until they are gone.

How long?

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
43. Shut off all utilities
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:46 PM
Jan 2016

Turn off the power, water, and phones. Their mobile devices will die in short order and they'll realize they're speaking to nobody but themselves.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
50. There's a reason for that
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:13 AM
Jan 2016

The (insert name of any Progressive demonstration) people weren't trying to touch off a civil war. These guys are.

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
34. True. For a progressive/liberal/Democratic site
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jan 2016

there are plenty here who will say anything to defend any actions of white, right-wing, fundamentalist gun nuts. I guess it's because they fit the demographic.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
20. On another blog someone tried to defend
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:05 PM
Jan 2016

these Mormon terrorists by claiming that it was a
peaceful protest, because they were not using their
guns, just kept them for their protection!

Just imagine AAs or muslims walking around with guns,
and what would happen to them. If OWS members had
carried guns for their protection, there would have been
a bloodbath as well,imo.

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
21. another example of gun humping cowards being catered to
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:23 PM
Jan 2016

as long as they're not, you know, one of THOSE people

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
24. And yet some still think CNN has some kind of liberal leanings...no, never.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:26 AM
Jan 2016

Just another garbage pundit channel like foxnews.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
26. I just spent my evening covering the Tamir Rice vigil in City Heights
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:12 AM
Jan 2016

dime on the dollar we had far more cops watching us, (and the CHP was waiting to come in well en force) than these guys in Oregon...

Sad statement

I will write the story tomorrow and post it... if nothing else. people need to listen to the poem, (which will go up if the sound is good)

I am just too damn tired to write it right now.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
28. I think a trip through the building they're squatting in
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:27 AM
Jan 2016

will tell a far different story. I've seen property that self styled revolutionaries were in and they were even paying rent, it is never pretty. Undoubtedly this bunch will do significant damage even if they relieve themselves in the toilets and don't burn any of the furniture for warmth.

Dretownblues

(253 posts)
29. The stupidity
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:55 AM
Jan 2016

In the media is mind-numbing. If they were Afirican Americans or Muslim Americans they wouldn't have lasted this long, and the media would be calling them thugs or terrorists.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
30. The Oregon terrorists are attempting to put the government in a no-win position.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:32 AM
Jan 2016

If the FBI or federal marshals (or, conceivably, National Guard troops) swoop in and start shooting, this event will become a rallying cry for conservatives/government haters a la Ruby Ridge and Waco.

OTOH, if the government lays siege and attempts to wait them out, they appear weak, and only encourage more of this kind of terrorism.

The government needs to combat this by making sure that the language and narrative used to tell this story are not shaped by conservative/anti-government noise machines.

1) They are terrorists, not protesters: If this were an unarmed occupation - fine. The moment you come armed, there is an implied threat to life. Threat to life is, by definition, terror.

2) They are convicted criminals: The parties were convicted of arson. They served time under a sentence eventually deemed not to have met sentencing guidelines, and were resentenced (less time served). The case has gone to the SCOTUS -- they've had their day in court and lost.

3) They are not a "well regulated militia": They are not the Oregon National Guard. End of discussion.

4) This is not Pine Ridge in '73: These are not an indigenous group that has been placed on a reservation and repeatedly had their treaties violated.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
42. step 2 doesn't really apply
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jan 2016

The Bundy led militia group that has taken the refuge as hostage, is not concerned with the Hammonds. They were not part of the original protests in Burns. They just piggy-backed onto that cause because it was somewhat "associated" with federal land use concerns. They have co-opted it and turned the Refuge takeover into a government land confiscation issue...and they could care less that the Hammonds are going back to jail.

Everything else you said is right on.

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)
33. Remember the Occupy Wall Street encampments?
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 03:09 AM
Jan 2016

No buildings burned or violence there, things worked out peacefully.

If martyred this would only enable the next generation of pseudo patriots, the same way current anti terrorist policy works in the Middle East.

Yes, kill the gun humpers, brilliant strategy.

lark

(23,091 posts)
37. Pure B.S.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 03:47 PM
Jan 2016

What has Black Lives Matter destroyed? That's not the metric at all. The metric is the skin color. This said "the militias aren't destroying anything". I'd bet that's not right. Traipsing around on a reserve, are they keeping it well picked up, are they respecting the wildlife or are they killing it for sport, are they messing up public property? My bet would be on the later.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
46. I DAMN WELL GUARANGAWDDAMNTEE YOU!!!!
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jan 2016

That gift shop has been completely cleaned out of Snickers.

Lucky Luciano

(11,253 posts)
47. I totally read this sentence wrong the first time:
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jan 2016

“The last thing we need is some type of large confrontation because that’s when stuff goes bad,” Roderick explained. "

I read it as "...Redneck explained."

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
53. Hilarious
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 07:48 AM
Jan 2016

We don't loot in my neighborhood, Brian. We basically go to work, pay taxes, raise kids and do the things people in white neighborhoods do.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
55. typical american
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 10:49 AM
Jan 2016

media/pundit/rw/progressive response these days. Wouldn't want any of the great american 'patriots' to get hurt, would we.... RED ALERT!!! RED ALERT!!! good american patriots in danger!!!!!.

Beowulf42

(204 posts)
56. Just Heard on the Stephanie Miller Show:
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jan 2016

Build an iron prison fence around the place, line it with concertina wire and call it a Federal Jail Bird Sanctuary. Now that IS funny.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
57. If there isn't any water, and there isn't any heat, and there isn't any power they will be borrowing
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jan 2016

one another's socks.

NoMoreRepugs

(9,412 posts)
58. how about this scenario?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jan 2016

there are thousands of these whackadoodles across the country that
may become 'brave' enough as NOTHING happens to these terrorists in Oregon to seize
Federal buildings in other locations. Now what's the plan??

They have broken the law and have as best I understand it zero hostages - time to gear
up and go in with overwhelming force and end this - saturate the building with tear gas
and use rubber bullets by the THOUSANDS once they emerge - and believe me they will come out when facing military grade gas - problem solved before we have a problem that can't be solved.

NoMoreRepugs

(9,412 posts)
59. from the SPLC to further make my case
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jan 2016

“We believe these armed extremists have been emboldened by what they saw as a clear victory at the Cliven Bundy ranch and the fact that no one was held accountable for taking up arms against agents of the federal government,” said Heidi Beirich, director of the SPLC’s Intelligence Project.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN: White militiamen are...