Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:04 PM Jan 2016

German Sexual Assaults Lead To ‘I Told You So’ Claims On Muslim Immigrants In U.S.

American conservatives are claiming a "we told you so" moment.

From Republican front-runner Donald Trump to evangelical Franklin Graham, many on the political right are pointing to the shocking wave of sexual assaults in Germany as a justification of their concerns of Muslim immigration.

It's now clear that what police first described as a "relaxed atmosphere" in Cologne, Germany, on New Year's Eve was anything but: Of the more than 500 criminal complaints related to incidents near the city's main train station that night, roughly 40 percent include allegations of sexual assault, including at least two rapes. A police report cited by the BBC described the assailants — small groups of men broken out from an estimated 1,000-man crowd — as "almost exclusively" North African or Arab.

To conservatives, the depraved assaults confirmed their fears.

"What's going on in Germany is unthinkable," Donald Trump said at an Iowa rally over the weekend, when he linked the incidents abroad to "radical Islamic terrorism."

MORE...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/11/german-sexual-assaults-lead-to-i-told-you-so-claims-on-muslim-immigrants/

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
German Sexual Assaults Lead To ‘I Told You So’ Claims On Muslim Immigrants In U.S. (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2016 OP
Did you expect anything different? philosslayer Jan 2016 #1
Obviously, you are not female. We don't need this kind of harrassment here. smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #4
not to mention, Islam is not a race ericson00 Jan 2016 #110
No, but some people here think they are. However they do have a certain smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #113
You consider mass, mob sexual assault to be "not much of an excuse"? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #5
Rape is no big deal? Democat Jan 2016 #11
I guess being a women = "Islamophobe" in your world. Coventina Jan 2016 #18
Post after post on 840high Jan 2016 #79
I have skin in this game, do you? philosslayer Jan 2016 #83
dailymail.... 840high Jan 2016 #92
Neither do misogynists. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #112
Yeah, they were right. This has been a devastating turn of events. plus5mace Jan 2016 #2
Yes, and as usual the rape apologists will be out in full force with their charges of smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #3
Like the very first post leftynyc Jan 2016 #14
Liberals are too "politically correct" to stop them? Who does that sound like? pampango Jan 2016 #8
As far as I can tell there haven't been any actual arrests in these numerous attacks. LisaL Jan 2016 #9
If it were true, it would be evidence of the dreaded liberal "PC free pass" that Trump touts. pampango Jan 2016 #13
This get the red out Jan 2016 #43
Even a broken clock is right Boudica the Lyoness Jan 2016 #84
Merkel admits there is a problem, just too many, too fast Jim Beard Jan 2016 #6
I told you so, too. Quantess Jan 2016 #7
It's kind of obvious. LisaL Jan 2016 #10
It's not obvious if you aren't allowed to single out problematic cultures. frizzled Jan 2016 #25
And what would be your argument leftynyc Jan 2016 #60
I'm not right wing and I 840high Jan 2016 #81
Eventually the left will be forced to face reality Democat Jan 2016 #12
Probably not until Europe takes a hard turn to the right. sufrommich Jan 2016 #15
Hopefully America won't make the same mistake Democat Jan 2016 #16
I don't know why the RW gets to own the language on this. There is nothing wrong with jonno99 Jan 2016 #62
You don't often hear liberals say pampango Jan 2016 #17
Unfortunately, and what makes everything so difficult The2ndWheel Jan 2016 #19
Is that all that is? Fear of the RW? If the RW comes out against mass, mob sexual assault Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #20
Hardly. The RW has been anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim for a long time, not pro-women's rights. pampango Jan 2016 #21
Norway is conducting anti-rape classes for its immigrants. That seems as if they're stereotyping. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #22
As a voluntary program that is part of acculturation classes. pampango Jan 2016 #36
Voluntary? Unless I hear different I'll have my doubts that potential perpetrators will take jonno99 Jan 2016 #51
Bank robbers need a voluntary class about not stealing. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #53
Some cultures don't do private property - so that might be appropriate. frizzled Jan 2016 #57
Yep - a class lasting about 3 to 5 ought to do it...nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #58
Exactly! Voluntary classes. That's like putting smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #68
It still needed to be offered is the point. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #52
I think Norway would agree. The point is that not all Syrians or all Muslims are the same. pampango Jan 2016 #65
There is one -- and only one -- common denominator to the NYE attacks. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #71
American universities have the same classes for (mostly white christian) male students mwrguy Jan 2016 #91
Are they targeting white Christian males? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #97
You don't often hear liberals try to minimize rape gangs either Democat Jan 2016 #28
Do you think there's a change in attitudes from some on the left at present? frizzled Jan 2016 #30
I don't know what's going on in the USA, since I'm in Europe. Quantess Jan 2016 #37
I hope never. Check post #21 at 10:22. "German authorities should arrest and prosecute those guilty pampango Jan 2016 #38
There is an irreducible conflict between feminism and multiculturalism. frizzled Jan 2016 #23
You have to be a woman to understand this on the raw level. I don't think you do... Quantess Jan 2016 #54
I'd be interested in what you think you're getting from it that I'm not. frizzled Jan 2016 #56
Cheers! Quantess Jan 2016 #95
I've long said "I'm a feminist, not a multiculturalist." Dems to Win Jan 2016 #63
THANK YOU! get the red out Jan 2016 #94
We'll take it my take on "feminism" Quantess Jan 2016 #64
Neither am I. Marr Jan 2016 #24
Womens' right to not be sexually assulted takes a backseat to multiculturalism. Quantess Jan 2016 #27
did you claim Muslim men are more likely to commit rape? treestar Jan 2016 #66
I thought Trump was blaming Mexican immigrants for rape. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #26
I really hate it that this turn of events have made Trump ..... (Lack of right word) Jim Beard Jan 2016 #32
My theory is that was a deliberate rope-a-dope on Trump's part frizzled Jan 2016 #33
Xenophobia about immigrants is nothing new. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #35
Mexicans aren't muslims. Quantess Jan 2016 #42
No, they're usually Catholics (EEEK!!). Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #44
Oh whoops it took me too long to edit my reply to you. Quantess Jan 2016 #46
My gardener is a Mexican. My optometrist is a Palestinian. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #48
Sigh.... I hope that all of us are sharing this mindset. The issue here is the political cover-up. Quantess Jan 2016 #49
All I'm saying is that individuals commit crimes. Prosecute them. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #50
Provide some some examples, then we'll see. Quantess Jan 2016 #55
Examples of what? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #69
"indulging in xenophobia"? - as mentioned elswhere, there is the whole jonno99 Jan 2016 #59
So does Catholicism and other Christian religions. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #72
The degree to which Catholicism and other Christian religions suppress the rights jonno99 Jan 2016 #74
I think that's already been decided. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #76
Were that it was as simple as that. It is definately not decided. Simply jonno99 Jan 2016 #77
I did. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #85
No, you are wrong, it is uncontroled MASSIVE migration, not orderly immigration Jim Beard Jan 2016 #70
Does that apply equally to other races, religions, countries of origin? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #75
Generally speaking, a bloke Boudica the Lyoness Jan 2016 #87
Generally speaking a Muslim won't rape you. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #88
I hate stereotypes just as much as you! Quantess Jan 2016 #98
Especially your eye doctor Boudica the Lyoness Jan 2016 #106
Because of your icon. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #109
Sweden tried to educate immigrants on women, this is what happened LittleBlue Jan 2016 #29
Yes. UK Labour will collapse if they can't support sensible limits on migration. frizzled Jan 2016 #31
They're already in freefall after that last election debacle LittleBlue Jan 2016 #34
What on earth have the SNP got to do with all this? Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #99
What are you going on about? LittleBlue Jan 2016 #100
No, I didn't miss that election because unlike you, I suspect, I actually live in Scotland. Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #101
I know, but your responses have nothing to do with anything I'm saying LittleBlue Jan 2016 #103
And your failure to stick to a point and see it through isn't mine, but here goes anyway ... Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #105
You're really going to double down on this rather than admit you made a mistake? LittleBlue Jan 2016 #107
Heh. "Blocks of paragraphs" after your belated copy/paste spree above. Love it. Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #108
If you're going to keep extensively editing posts like this, we could indeed be here all night ... Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #111
OK. You've now edited your post extensively, so let's address your additions. Denzil_DC Jan 2016 #102
What does this have anything to do with what I said? LittleBlue Jan 2016 #104
I don't see how it applies here. PeteSelman Jan 2016 #39
So, if an action leads to a refugee getting their ass shot, isn't the damange to the... ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2016 #41
You can't just shoot them before they do anything. PeteSelman Jan 2016 #47
The stupid right wing never said a goddamned thing about groping. So, there is no... ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2016 #40
I agree get the red out Jan 2016 #45
I supported the immigrants 100%. I was wrong and am disappointed. Oneironaut Jan 2016 #61
that's because they like holding a group responsible treestar Jan 2016 #67
A group that comes from a part of the world where women are treated very poorly davidn3600 Jan 2016 #78
Any group of men could do a thing like that treestar Jan 2016 #86
Yet officials are saying it's never happened before. B2G Jan 2016 #89
So are you saying it's a massive coincidence they almost all came from one minority culture? frizzled Jan 2016 #90
yes, this is true. this is why there will be repercussions for millions for the acts of La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2016 #82
For all the doubters that think it is race Jim Beard Jan 2016 #73
the reality is that in this instance they were right, and what happened is shitty La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2016 #80
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #93
-SIGH- I am getting this from my mother... Xyzse Jan 2016 #96
 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
4. Obviously, you are not female. We don't need this kind of harrassment here.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jan 2016

You obviously don't care about how this affects women. What is the difference between being prejudiced upon race or sex? You are just choosing one over the other.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
113. No, but some people here think they are. However they do have a certain
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jan 2016

common set of cultural/religious values. And they are fairly uniform. They almost all subscribe to the idea the Sharia law should be the law of the land. That is a problem in my book.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
11. Rape is no big deal?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:04 AM
Jan 2016

I always thought DU members took rape pretty seriously, but a few don't see any big deal in this case?

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
83. I have skin in this game, do you?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jan 2016

I have a daughter who lives in Germany. I can assure you that I find this situation as upsetting as anyone on this board.

That being said, the prevailing wisdom seems to have switched from bringing those responsible to justice to a blanket condemnation of migrants and a shout increasing in volume that "those dirty migrants are responsible for this!". Tarring an entire group based on the actions of a tiny minority is racism, pure and simple.

See below. THAT is the result of this type of attitude.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3395246/Hundreds-far-right-protesters-rampage-German-town-Leipzig-destroying-ethnic-restaurants-takeaways-latest-anti-migrant-demonstrations.html

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
92. dailymail....
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jan 2016

Girl, 17, is 'raped' and her 14-year-old sister is sexually assaulted as she tried to save her when group of Syrian migrants surrounded them at German public swimming pool

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3395924/Girl-17-raped-14-year-old-sister-sexually-assaulted-tried-save-group-Syrian-migrants-surrounded-German-public-swimming-pool.html#ixzz3x45yZ99O
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

plus5mace

(140 posts)
2. Yeah, they were right. This has been a devastating turn of events.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jan 2016

Muslims get a free pass to rape women in Europe because the government is too PC to stop them. It's like something in a right wing comic book. If I read it as fiction, I'd say it wasn't a credible story line, yet here is the chiefs of police in two large cities saying that they covered up crimes to avoid creating anti-immigrant sentiment. The whole Bernie vs Hillary show won't mean anything if the public thinks we care more about not causing offense than about protecting them.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
3. Yes, and as usual the rape apologists will be out in full force with their charges of
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:37 PM
Jan 2016

"islamaphobia". If the shoe fits...

pampango

(24,692 posts)
8. Liberals are too "politically correct" to stop them? Who does that sound like?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 06:48 AM
Jan 2016
Muslims get a free pass to rape women in Europe because the government is too PC to stop them.

Acting and sounding like Marine Le Pen or Geert Wilders is not the answer. All Muslims are not bad people. They do not get a 'free pass' to rape women in Europe', regardless of what the far-right claims. The vast majority of them are good people as is true with any ethnic or racial group.

The whole Bernie vs Hillary show won't mean anything if the public thinks we care more about not causing offense than about protecting them.

The Donald, Cruz and the other republicans are all about protecting us from evil Muslims (and Mexicans and gay marriage and China and Japan, etc.). If 'protection' from all the evil Muslims is what you are looking for, there is a party for that. The GOP will keep them all out of the US under the assumption that they are all bad. Should we start to act like republicans (condemn 'political correctness', create and cater to fear) in order to win the next election?

LisaL

(44,972 posts)
9. As far as I can tell there haven't been any actual arrests in these numerous attacks.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:00 AM
Jan 2016

Does that not qualify as "free pass?"

pampango

(24,692 posts)
13. If it were true, it would be evidence of the dreaded liberal "PC free pass" that Trump touts.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:14 AM
Jan 2016
Thirty-one people, most of them North African or Middle Eastern countries, have been charged in the attacks. Of those, 18 have been identified as asylum-seekers.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/09/europe/germany-new-year-violence/
 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
6. Merkel admits there is a problem, just too many, too fast
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:50 AM
Jan 2016

[link:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3394896/Merkel-admits-Europe-lost-control-refugee-crisis.html|Under fire Merkel admits Europe has 'lost control' of the refugee crisis as thousands of demonstrators take to the streets of Germany shouting 'take your Muslims with you' after sex attack crisis

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3394896/Merkel-admits-Europe-lost-control-refugee-crisis.html#ixzz3x0SKsGgt
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
]

German Chancellor admitted Europe is 'vulnerable' and said countries do not have control of the situation
Angela Merkel also said the euro was 'directly linked' to freedom of movement in Europe and if countries do not allow their borders to be crossed without much difficulty, the European single market would 'suffer acutely'
Thousands of people took to the streets of the German city of Leipzig to protest against the influx of refugees
Protesters chanted 'Resistance!' and 'Deport them!' and some had signs which read 'Refugees not welcome!'


k

LisaL

(44,972 posts)
10. It's kind of obvious.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:03 AM
Jan 2016

You let that many people into the country (from a completely different culture, no less), you are bound to have problems.

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
25. It's not obvious if you aren't allowed to single out problematic cultures.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

The events of the last few weeks lend a great deal of support to the right-wing thesis that political correctness over policing migrant cultures properly is hindering public safety.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
62. I don't know why the RW gets to own the language on this. There is nothing wrong with
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

those on the left supporting sensible immigration policies. To do otherwise leaves a vacuum of ideas - to be filled with those from the likes of Trump.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
17. You don't often hear liberals say
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jan 2016

"the left will be forced to face reality" and adopt the attitudes and policies of the right.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
19. Unfortunately, and what makes everything so difficult
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jan 2016

is that there isn't a true reality out there somewhere. Every person or side thinks they or it sees the correct reality. It's all subjective. Which is itself a subjective statement, which means there might be a one true reality. We really can't know. Again with the subjectivity.

With the amount of time that human beings have been around, if all of us can't agree on everything by now, we most likely never will. Damn, did it again.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
20. Is that all that is? Fear of the RW? If the RW comes out against mass, mob sexual assault
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:42 AM
Jan 2016

good Progressives have to make excuses and actively ignore mass, mob sexual assault?

That's not principled. That's debased political partisan hackery and that is very un-Progressive.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
21. Hardly. The RW has been anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim for a long time, not pro-women's rights.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jan 2016

RW'ers use these assaults to whip up more anti-immigrant, anti-refugee sentiment by stereotyping all as the same as the criminal element within them. Trump, Le Pen, Wilders and other RW'ers will seek to ban all Muslims and send home all the refugees who have been admitted.

good Progressives have to make excuses and actively ignore mass, mob sexual assault?

No. To use Trump's favorite term of derision, we do not have to be so "politically correct" that we ignore mob sexual assault - whether is by immigrants, refugees, Muslims, Mexicans, Blacks or good ol' native-born white folks.

Progressives should support the enforcement of laws that protect all of us, without joining in RW hysteria about Muslims and immigrants. German authorities should arrest and prosecute those guilty of assault and rape regardless of where they were born, what language they speak, what religion they are, etc. Then continue to promote and explain liberal policies.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
36. As a voluntary program that is part of acculturation classes.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016
A voluntary five-hour programme offered nationwide involves group discussions of sex and rape, and teaches that types of violence considered ‘honourable’ in some cultures are illegal and shameful in Norway.

Most European countries have avoided such integration initiatives, fearing they may stigmatise refugees as potential rapists and fuel anti-immigration rhetoric.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/norway-teaching-refugees-about-sexual-consent-a6780536.html

When I was in the Peace Corps we took lessons in the social and sexual mores of the country we were in and learned to live by them. I suspect most Muslims will be able to do the same.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
51. Voluntary? Unless I hear different I'll have my doubts that potential perpetrators will take
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jan 2016

a class and realize "oh - you mean these women don't really like our advances?!".

No, like rapists everywhere they use it as a form of power and control. And for those who "get off" on controlling others, this is not easily remedied - short of removal from society.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
68. Exactly! Voluntary classes. That's like putting
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

a band-aid over a gaping flesh wound. It's nothing but lip service and nothing will change for the better.

It isn't that these men don't know better, it's that they don't care and they know they can get away with it without punishment. That is why they do it. They want to put uppity western women in their place and there is no authority around with the cojones to stand up to them.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
52. It still needed to be offered is the point.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jan 2016

There is a rape culture and it needs to be confronted without all the PC tip-toeing because the freedom and safety of women is at risk.

Failure to do so will only feed the backlash.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
65. I think Norway would agree. The point is that not all Syrians or all Muslims are the same.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jan 2016

The freedom and safety of women needs to be assured without stereotyping and discriminating against entire groups of people. If you believe that avoiding stereotyping and discrimination is "PC tip-toeing", there is one candidate in particular who would probably agree with you.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
71. There is one -- and only one -- common denominator to the NYE attacks.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:25 PM
Jan 2016

And this is not an isolated event. The attacks were par for the cultural course. It is a cultural issue and it has to be dealt with, without the partisan fear mongering at the expense of women.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
91. American universities have the same classes for (mostly white christian) male students
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jan 2016

'Consent 101' and the like.

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
30. Do you think there's a change in attitudes from some on the left at present?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016

I'm seeing this online and in some papers, but I'm curious to know if you agree.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
37. I don't know what's going on in the USA, since I'm in Europe.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:23 PM
Jan 2016

I have noticed a slight increase in criticism of the extremely welcoming and generous immigration policy in Sweden. You are not immediately, knee-jerk labelled, "RACIST" anymore for stating obvious truths and for taking about real incidences, like compared with 6 months ago or a couple of years ago. Shit has gotten real, and most people know it.

You asked the other person, not me, I know.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
38. I hope never. Check post #21 at 10:22. "German authorities should arrest and prosecute those guilty
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:24 PM
Jan 2016

of assault and rape regardless of where they were born, what language they speak, what religion they are, etc."

If that constitutes 'minimizing rape gangs' we just have different definitions.

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
23. There is an irreducible conflict between feminism and multiculturalism.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

Must-read link here:

http://freedomfromunrealloyalties.tumblr.com/post/132847281088/from-is-multiculturalism-bad-for-women-edited#tumblr_notes

In its demand for equality for women, feminism sets itself in opposition to virtually every culture on earth.


Our ruling elites don't like to talk in terms of blunt conflicts, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

It implies that some aspects of our society are unworkable and the project of multicultural liberalism will fail, but we're under no such obligation here to pretend all is rosy.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
54. You have to be a woman to understand this on the raw level. I don't think you do...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jan 2016

Thank you though, for pointing it out! Good post!

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
56. I'd be interested in what you think you're getting from it that I'm not.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:26 PM
Jan 2016

I don't believe in "innate knowledge" that can't be explained to other people, either :^)

That being said, I freely admit I'm neither female nor any orthodoxy of feminist, though I'm sympathetic to many feminist concerns.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
95. Cheers!
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jan 2016

You already implied you were not a woman. It's completely okay, there are a lot of likeable men in the world.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
63. I've long said "I'm a feminist, not a multiculturalist."
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jan 2016

If a culture does not respect women, I don't respect that culture. (and I'm plenty willing to criticize my own culture). I believe in Universal Human Rights, with no exceptions for cultural traditions.

get the red out

(13,460 posts)
94. THANK YOU!
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jan 2016

One big reason I am "not a good liberal". Every culture that ever existed before the ones we see today, has come and gone, or changed. Ignorance need not be supported IMO. Universal Human Rights (that consider women human), need to come before anything else.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
24. Neither am I.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jan 2016

I expect this sort of schizoid, cognitive dissonance is going to be the norm on the left until more people figure out it's not 'liberal' to stand up for misogynistic/anti-gay/anti-intellectual bullshit like Islam.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
27. Womens' right to not be sexually assulted takes a backseat to multiculturalism.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

Women, (young women and teenage girls, mostly) get the short end of the stick in the name of cultural tolerance.
This is unacceptable, and women (and anyone who is pro-gay and transgender friendly) need to speak up against these lying policies of these deceptive european countries.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
66. did you claim Muslim men are more likely to commit rape?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

any proof of that or justification why they should be judged as a group for the actions of some of the individuals?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
26. I thought Trump was blaming Mexican immigrants for rape.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jan 2016

When will he get to Americans who actually perpetrate most rapes here.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
32. I really hate it that this turn of events have made Trump ..... (Lack of right word)
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jan 2016

It is now going to very difficult to explain CONTROLLED immigration and the floods of uncontrolled immigrants. Trump was ready for it, showing that clip of migrants rushing the Moroccan border when he could have used CNN footage of the Syrian & other refugees crashing Hungry s gates and flooding the country.

Sweden and Denmark are also having massive problems.

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
33. My theory is that was a deliberate rope-a-dope on Trump's part
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jan 2016

Trump does this kind of thing a lot. Everyone thinks he's an idiot, but those "blunders" get talked about.

It's in his interests to fuzz the boundary between "illegal immigrant" and "scary Muslim".

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
35. Xenophobia about immigrants is nothing new.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:15 PM
Jan 2016

We've had more that our fair share of it here. From "No Irish Need Apply", to "The Yellow Peril", to internment camps. Now it's evil Muslims, tomorrow it will be horror stories about Andorrans.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
42. Mexicans aren't muslims.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jan 2016

What else can I say?

Middle Eastern muslim refugees and Mexicans are not the same, at all.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
44. No, they're usually Catholics (EEEK!!).
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jan 2016

Like most Italians, Irish, and Portuguese.

Maybe we can finally whittle down our population of REAL Americans to not too scary blue eyed Presbyterians.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
46. Oh whoops it took me too long to edit my reply to you.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

I live in Sweden, where we have had a huge influx of asylum seekers / refugees of muslim origin and I stand by my statements. I wish we had more Mexican immigrants into Sweden.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
48. My gardener is a Mexican. My optometrist is a Palestinian.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:49 PM
Jan 2016

The guy who sold me my car is Egyptian..

None of them are prone to rape.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
49. Sigh.... I hope that all of us are sharing this mindset. The issue here is the political cover-up.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jan 2016

European politicians lying and or covering up information, and police actively discouraging young women report sexual assault, is the subject.

Go find another thread that fits your motives better.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
50. All I'm saying is that individuals commit crimes. Prosecute them.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jan 2016

If the cops, politicians, etc, are covering up crimes, fire them. Regardless of race, ethnicity, or place of birth.

What I'm seeing on this thread and similar ones are people indulging in xenophobia, something I put on the same level as racism and misogyny.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
59. "indulging in xenophobia"? - as mentioned elswhere, there is the whole
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jan 2016

thing about Sharia - which seems to codify that the status of women is not the same as men. This is not a small thing. If men come from a background where Sharia is the norm, we've got a larger issue to resolve - namely, how to incorporate Sharia into western culture (can it be done? I don't know.).

I don't claim to be an expert on Sharia, so feel free to educate me if what I've heard is incorrect

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
72. So does Catholicism and other Christian religions.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:26 PM
Jan 2016

They've been incorporated into "western culture"...or are they "western culture"? So, has Judaism which has similar misogynistic customs and tenets.

Do most Muslims indulge in rape. Are most Irish alcoholics? Do most Italians belong to the Mafia? Do most Asians eat dogs and cats?

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
74. The degree to which Catholicism and other Christian religions suppress the rights
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jan 2016

of women is (I'm guessing) an order of magnitude less than does Sharia. More importantly, I haven't seen any serious effort in the US to create court systems that strictly observe only a particular religious text - as does Sharia.

Do most Muslims indulge in rape? No.

The more important question is: Do most Muslims support the idea of Sharia courts?

This needs to be addressed...

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
76. I think that's already been decided.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
77. Were that it was as simple as that. It is definately not decided. Simply
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

Google: 'Sharia law in the united states'

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
85. I did.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

What I found was a lot of xenophobic RW groups promoting anti-sharia laws.

But, one good article from the NYT. Below is a portion of it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/31/us/31shariah.html?_r=0

Early versions of the law, which passed in Tennessee and then Louisiana, made no mention of Shariah, which was necessary to pass constitutional muster, Mr. Yerushalmi said. But as the movement spread, state lawmakers began tweaking the legislation to refer to Shariah and other religious laws or systems — including, in one ill-fated proposal in Arizona, “karma.”

By last fall, the anti-Shariah movement had gained new prominence. ACT for America spent $60,000 promoting the Oklahoma initiative, a campaign that included 600,000 robocalls featuring Mr. Woolsey, the former C.I.A. director. Mr. Gingrich called for a federal law banning courts from using Shariah in place of American law, and Sarah Palin warned that if Shariah law “were to be adopted, allowed to govern in our country, it will be the downfall of America.”

Mr. Yerushalmi’s legislation has drawn opposition from the American Civil Liberties Union as well as from Catholic bishops and Jewish groups. Mr. Yerushalmi said he did not believe that court cases involving Jewish or canon law would be affected by the statutes because they are unlikely to involve violations of constitutional rights.

Business lobbyists have also expressed concern about the possible effect of the statutes, as corporations often favor foreign laws in contracts or tort disputes. This is perhaps the only constituency that has had an influence. The three state statutes that have passed — most recently in Arizona — make corporations exempt.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
70. No, you are wrong, it is uncontroled MASSIVE migration, not orderly immigration
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:24 PM
Jan 2016

it is not xenophobia to want orderly immigration.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
75. Does that apply equally to other races, religions, countries of origin?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016

What is "controlled" immigration and how does it work?

Will it specify certain groups as unacceptable? Like the Chinese Exclusion Act?

http://academic.udayton.edu/race/02rights/immigr09.htm

The horrendous treatment of Chinese immigrants in the 1800s by federal, state, and local governments, as well as by the public at large, represents a bitter underside to U.S. history. Culminating the federalization of immigration regulation, Congress passed the infamous Chinese exclusion laws barring virtually all immigration of persons of Chinese ancestry and severely punishing Chinese immigrants who violated the harsh laws. Discrimination and violence, often rooted in class conflict as well as racist sympathies, directed at Chinese immigrants already in the United States, particularly in California, fueled passage of the laws. The efforts to exclude future Chinese immigrants from our shores can be seen as linked to the deeply negative attitude toward Chinese persons already in the country.

The Supreme Court emphasized national sovereignty as the rationale for not disturbing the laws excluding the "obnoxious Chinese" from the United States. In the famous Chinese Exclusion Case, the Supreme Court stated that "[t]he power of exclusion of foreigners [is] an incident of sovereignty belonging to the government of the United States, as a part of [[[its] sovereign powers delegated by the Constitution." Similarly, in Fong Yue Ting v. United States, the Court reasoned that "[t]he right of a nation to expel or deport foreigners ... is as absolute and unqualified as the right to prohibit and prevent their entrance into the country."

Congress later extended the Chinese exclusion laws to bar immigration from other Asian nations and to prohibit the immigration of persons of Asian ancestry from any nation. The so-called Gentleman's Agreement between the U.S. and Japanese Governments in 1907-08 greatly restricted immigration from Japan. The Immigration Act of 1917 expanded Chinese exclusion to prohibit immigration from the "Asiatic barred zone." A 1924 law, best known for creating the discriminatory national origins quota system, allowed for the exclusion of noncitizens "ineligible to citizenship," which affected Asian immigrants who as non-whites were prohibited from naturalizing.

The United States

In the United States, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 became the first policy to explicitly prevent “sexual deviates” from entering the country, and it also required the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to deport these individuals.[3]

The Lavender Scare of the anti-communist 1950’s America created additional persecution of homosexuals and a spirit of fear among people with same-sex attraction. After the war, a "Pervert Elimination Campaign" was initiated in Washington D.C. by the U.S. Park Police. D.C. parks witnessed a number of sex charge arrests of gay men, many of whom subsequently lost their jobs. [4]

The United States military excluded homosexuals until 2011, and proposed that they were unfit for service. The law commonly known as “Don’t ask, don’t tell” allowed LGB people to serve as long as they kept their sexuality hidden. The Obama administration allowed LGB people to serve openly in the military. [5]

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
87. Generally speaking, a bloke
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:20 PM
Jan 2016

wont rape you while examining your eyes or selling you a car. That's been my experience anyway.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
88. Generally speaking a Muslim won't rape you.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jan 2016

And, in England, the chances of being raped by a non-Muslim is probably far higher than by a Muslim.

As an Employee Assistance counselor I dealt with a number of rape/sexual assault victims. None of them mentioned the ethnicity or religion of their attackers.

Do Muslims rape? Yes. Do Christians, Jews, Blacks, Whites, Buddhists, Hindus, Africans, Swedes, or Englishmen? Yes.

I hate stereotypes.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
98. I hate stereotypes just as much as you!
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 07:20 PM
Jan 2016

I have met young immigrant males from Afghanistan who are as far as I can tell, great, friendly young guys.

Your attitude suggests that you think the hush-hush sshhhhhh....... response is appropriate.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
106. Especially your eye doctor
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:17 PM
Jan 2016

while examining your eyes and the man trying to sell you a car!!!!!! That's when YOU see your eye doctor and car salesman right?

And who the fuck mentioned Englishmen?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
109. Because of your icon.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jan 2016

And, Boudica, I'm leaping to a conclusion about YOUR ethnicity.

Yes. I usually see my optometrist when I get my eyes checked. And, I have never been nervous about her raping me. And, though the Egyptian car salesman was friendly and we chatted about his family and life in Egypt he betrayed no inclination to rape me. And, I fully trust my wife is safe from rape when home alone with our Mexican gardener.

What about you? Do you have any foreign friends/acquaintances that you suspect of being rapists because of their ethnicity or religion?

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
29. Sweden tried to educate immigrants on women, this is what happened
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016
Swedish Police, Accused of Cover-Up, Look Into Reports of Sex Assault at Festival

LONDON — The police in Sweden, responding to accusations of a cover-up, said on Monday that they were investigating why the public had not been informed about sexual assaults by men reported to be migrants at a festival in Stockholm last summer.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/world/europe/swedish-police-coverup-sexual-assault.html

Cameron was called a racist for not taking more immigrants. He will come out of this looking golden while Merkel and the rest of the free immigration crowd look ridiculous.

I'll say it. I told you so.
 

frizzled

(509 posts)
31. Yes. UK Labour will collapse if they can't support sensible limits on migration.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

Unfortunately the idealistic open-borders lot seem to be in opposition over there, and that will be highly unpopular.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
34. They're already in freefall after that last election debacle
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jan 2016

With the SNP gutting their party from the inside out and the Tories crushing them elsewhere. Not to mention Corbyn's rise to party leader.

This is just another dagger.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
99. What on earth have the SNP got to do with all this?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jan 2016

They're in favor of controlled immigration (as is the British Labour Party, last I looked), but openly enthusiastic about welcoming refugees.

In fact, here's a souvenir mug from Labour's oh-so-successful 2015 general election campaign. They may have a few left if you order now. Cheers.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
100. What are you going on about?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:35 PM
Jan 2016

We're discussing Labour and why it's fallen on hard times.

Did you miss the last election or...?

The SNP has recorded a historic landslide general election victory in Scotland, winning 56 out of 59 seats.

Labour has been left with just one MP north of the border, but its Scottish leader Jim Murphy, who lost his seat, said he would continue in his post.

The Liberal Democrats lost 10 seats with only Alistair Carmichael holding on in Orkney and Shetland.

The Conservatives held Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale - the other seat to withstand the SNP tsunami.

The headlines of the night were:

Results across Scotland saw the SNP win 50 seats, Labour lose 40 and the Lib Dems lose 10

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-scotland-32635871

Why did you bother finding a silly picture of a random mug? The Labour leader himself has called for more immigration.

The Labour leadership frontrunner dismissed calls for the party to advocate tougher border controls in an attempt to win back voters angered by the surge in mass migration over the last decade.

And he insisted that rapid population change in local communities was beneficial to youngsters because it helped develop "a very good understanding of the rest of the world".

His message during a live radio debate last night provoked concerns that Labour will continue to back open-door border controls if he is elected as the successor to Ed Miliband.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/600725/Jeremy-Corbyn-Labour-migrants-Britain-benefit

Immigration is not a problem in the UK, Jeremy Corbyn has said as he faced questions over why he decided not to mention the issue in his keynote speech to the Labour party conference yesterday.

The Labour leader insisted Britain must instead celebrate the “enormous contribution to our society” that migrants have brought over the years and suggested the UK should look at immigration as “a very great opportunity”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-says-immigration-isnt-a-problem-a6673231.html

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
101. No, I didn't miss that election because unlike you, I suspect, I actually live in Scotland.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:47 PM
Jan 2016

Immigration wasn't a particular issue in Scotland during the last general election, unlike the rest of the UK, and on the few occasions it came up, the SNP's policies were explicitly more liberal than Labour's. In the context of this thread, I asked you what on earth the SNP had to do with it. You haven't answered that, so forgive me if I think it's you who needs to explain what you're going on about, if anyone.

Alternatively, do please proceed to inform me about what's going on in my own country.

P.S. Clumsily phrased bolded quote of yours there: The SNP gained 50 seats, it won a total of 56 out of 59. While being more liberal on immigration.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
103. I know, but your responses have nothing to do with anything I'm saying
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:01 PM
Jan 2016

It's a fact that SNP wiped out Labour in Scotland. Not even debatable, so what's the problem?

Immigration wasn't a particular issue in Scotland during the last general election, unlike the rest of the UK, and on the few occasions it came up, the SNP's policies were explicitly more liberal than Labour's.


I'm 100% aware that Scotland is more liberal than the rest of the UK.

You really need to reread what I said. I never even remotely implied that Labour lost to SNP because of immigration. I said it was one knife in Labour as they fell.

Your reading issues are not my problem.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
105. And your failure to stick to a point and see it through isn't mine, but here goes anyway ...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jan 2016

(And this will have to do for your other reply below as I'm rapidly losing the will to live.)

You started out in this thread with this (unless you've been doing more editing since):

Cameron was called a racist for not taking more immigrants. He will come out of this looking golden while Merkel and the rest of the free immigration crowd look ridiculous.


To which frizzled replied:

Yes. UK Labour will collapse if they can't support sensible limits on migration.

Unfortunately the idealistic open-borders lot seem to be in opposition over there, and that will be highly unpopular.


You then brought the SNP into it:


They're already in freefall after that last election debacle

With the SNP gutting their party from the inside out and the Tories crushing them elsewhere. Not to mention Corbyn's rise to party leader.

This is just another dagger.


Labour isn't part of your "free immigration crowd," even under Corbyn. The SNP is more liberal in policy, but is also not part of any "free immigration crowd."

Guess who else throws around terms like "free immigration crowd"?

UKIP.


 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
107. You're really going to double down on this rather than admit you made a mistake?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:19 PM
Jan 2016

For real? I'm going to have to sit here all night and reply to your blocks of paragraphs to defend myself against a point I never made?

One last time. I brought up SNP because it decimated Labour by replacing them in Scotland. Nowhere did I say anything about SNP relating to immigration or any other issue. Only that it was one factor contributing to Labour's downfall.

Why not just be an honest person and admit you misunderstood my post? This is juvenile.

Labour isn't part of your "free immigration crowd," even under Corbyn. The SNP is more liberal in policy, but is also not part of any "free immigration crowd."


That's like saying Obama's opinions don't affect the rest of the party. They do. He represents them. Corbyn was elected by the party to lead it. His opinions reflect on the party.

Labour has criticised government plans to re-settle 20,000 Syrian refugees in Britain by 2020, saying 4,000 a year is "not enough".

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34183150

They are the pro immigration party here. "Free immigration" is my jab at them. I know they aren't the same as Merkel's party.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
108. Heh. "Blocks of paragraphs" after your belated copy/paste spree above. Love it.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jan 2016

Looky:

Nowhere did I say anything about SNP relating to immigration or any other issue. Only that it was one factor contributing to Labour's downfall.


Forgive me if two consecutive sentences like that in the context of your remarks that prefaced them don't give the impression that you are linking the two issues.

Labour would have still lost the general election even if it had won every single one of Scotland's 59 seats. Look it up and do the math. So it's hard to see how the SNP's gains contributed to Labour's "downfall." They were irrelevant. The Tories won an outright - albeit relatively slim - majority over the rest of the parties combined, otherwise they might well not be in power.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
111. If you're going to keep extensively editing posts like this, we could indeed be here all night ...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jan 2016

... as it's going to be very difficult to keep up with the shifting sands of your additions.

I think I've managed to detect, ooh I don't know, some areas where things that President Obama wants in terms of policy haven't been supported by the Democrats in Congress, and even where certain House and Senate members have sought to distance themselves from him. Or maybe I dreamt that. Guantanamo? Nah. Must have been snoozing.

Likewise, and even more so, Corbyn is far from supported by the bulk of the Parliamentary Labour Party, in fact barely so by quite a number in his own cabinet.

That lack of coherence has more impact on Labour's current ills than any hard and fast policy initiatives.

Do some research on the refugee program in the UK. It's a completely separate issue from the European Union's open borders policy and economic migrancy, which is what's preoccupied so much of the debate in the UK and led to the rise of UKIP and excited the xenophobic Tory right.

The UK refugee program is highly regulated, and subject to constant scrutiny, not least by our media, who salivate at the thought there might be cockups and scandals to fill their pages and airtime.

I think the UK could indeed comfortably accommodate more that the 4,000 a year target into its population of 64 million. I'd argue that we have a moral duty to do more because of our responsibility for stirring up successive hornets' nests in the Middle East for fun and profit. But it has to be done right and adapt to any problems that emerge, for the sake of the refugees - the ones we've taken in so far have been through a hell of an ordeal already and spent long periods in refugee camps with their families, which is one reason why they were selected - as much as anyone else.

FWIW, I felt from the outset that Merkel's ambitious targets were headed for problems, in social cohesion terms let alone anything else, knowing a little about Germany's long-term issues with Gastarbeiter.

Denzil_DC

(7,222 posts)
102. OK. You've now edited your post extensively, so let's address your additions.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 08:59 PM
Jan 2016
Why did you bother finding a silly picture of a random mug? The Labour leader himself has called for more immigration.


That "silly picture of a random mug" was part of Labour's 2015 election campaign under Ed Miliband. It embodied "pledge no. 4" in their series of election promises.

The quotes you follow that remark with are from Jeremy Corbyn, who succeeded Ed Milliband - who lost the election despite "pledge no. 4" - and has yet to have his policies ratified by the Labour Party, let alone tested in a general election.

But again, do feel free to inform me what's going on in my own country. It's been interesting so far.
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
104. What does this have anything to do with what I said?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jan 2016

Go reread what I said and point out where I claimed anything remotely close to what you're implying.

With the SNP gutting their party from the inside out and the Tories crushing them elsewhere. Not to mention Corbyn's rise to party leader.

This is just another dagger.


Please find for me where I conflate the separate SNP and immigration issue. It's obvious that I'm claiming they are separate issues. Thanks.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
39. I don't see how it applies here.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jan 2016

Europeans are too cowed to fight back. Here? You'll get your ass shot if you try that shit.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
41. So, if an action leads to a refugee getting their ass shot, isn't the damange to the...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

...woman already done at that point?

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
47. You can't just shoot them before they do anything.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

I just don't see it happening here at all due to the threat of fighting back.

Nobody defends the Europeans, not the cops, not the government. There's defense here.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
40. The stupid right wing never said a goddamned thing about groping. So, there is no...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jan 2016

...I told you so.

Their objections were completely driven by racism and bigotry and hate, not because they're afraid refugees will grope/rape our women.

With that being said, however, we don't need people coming here who do not respect our laws, our culture, or without respect for our women. Period.

Oneironaut

(5,486 posts)
61. I supported the immigrants 100%. I was wrong and am disappointed.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jan 2016

I wanted to believe they could join European societies and be functioning citizens. While I don't think immigration should be banned from these countries, the vetting process needs to be strict. European is now rife with criminals, rapists, and terrorists. The right-wing blowback is going to be severe and ugly.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
67. that's because they like holding a group responsible
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

for the actions of some individuals in that group. Except for white people. They aren't responsible for bad white people.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
78. A group that comes from a part of the world where women are treated very poorly
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:54 PM
Jan 2016

So when that group goes into Europe, what do you think is going to happen?

I mean it's common sense. Is every single migrant a problem? Of course not. But when you have an open-door policy with virtually no screening (Germany), then you are going to let in a lot of troublemakers, radicals, criminals, and even terrorists.

What happened on New Years Eve is going to happen again.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
86. Any group of men could do a thing like that
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jan 2016

That just happened to be a bunch of Muslims "turn". They could keep all refugees out and still have those things happen. White men do this and are capable of it. There are refugees who truly are fleeing and would never do a thing like this. They should not be presumed guilty of what their fellows did.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
89. Yet officials are saying it's never happened before.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:33 PM
Jan 2016

White men gather by the hundreds to assault women? When did this happen?

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
90. So are you saying it's a massive coincidence they almost all came from one minority culture?
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jan 2016

Or what?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
82. yes, this is true. this is why there will be repercussions for millions for the acts of
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

a hundred or so people.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
73. For all the doubters that think it is race
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jan 2016

you can not get any more liberal than Sweden and Denmark and they have both closed their borders.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
80. the reality is that in this instance they were right, and what happened is shitty
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:56 PM
Jan 2016

and the fact that it happened will have repercussions.

when a stereotype is confirmed, it just amplifies the stereotype and in this case it was confirmed.

the whole thing is shitty.

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
96. -SIGH- I am getting this from my mother...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jan 2016

She asked me about this, and I told her to please don't lump all of a group together.

Then she went off asking "What's wrong with you?"

I just had to shrug it off, too tired to argue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»German Sexual Assaults Le...