General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo OP Claiming Cruz isn't a natural born citizen
WaPo ran a piece today from a professor at Widener who contends that Cruz isn't a "natural born citizen" as required to be president. I did a bit of reading on this issue when the crazy wing of the Republican party claimed a few years ago that President Obama wasn't eligible and I tend to agree with the author of the article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ted-cruz-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/2016/01/12/1484a7d0-b7af-11e5-99f3-184bc379b12d_story.html
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)T-rump ain't gonna make it. . .
I still think Rubio would be the most dangerous in the GE -- Trump won't draw enough independents and Rubio, while really right wing, isn't as batshit right wing crazy as Cruz (and is a better politician).
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 14, 2016, 02:17 PM - Edit history (1)
Lochloosa
(16,062 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)status as an american then he's toast. Lawrence Tribe doesn't believe he's legal either.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Canada does not require you renounce your citizenship when you become a naturalized citizen and the US government must take affirmative steps to revoke the citizenship of a person who becomes a citizen of a foreign nation should they choose to do so.
Since there is no paper trail on Cruz's mother losing her citizenship AND since she came back into the country as a full citizen, your theory does not hold water.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)WaPo finds the one legal scholar not part of the 99.3% of legal scholars who agree that Cruz is a natural born citizen.