Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:07 AM Jan 2016

Worse Than Isis. Mosul dam foundation dissolving. Half a million Iraqis could die State Dept. Warns

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/11/1468380/-Worse-Than-Isis-Mosul-dam-foundation-dissolving-Half-a-million-Iraqis-could-die-State-Dept-Warns

Only a madman would build a dam on a foundation of rock salt. That man would be Saddam Hussein. The dam would be Mosul Dam, Iraq’s largest. The rock salt would be gypsum, a salt of calcium and sulfate which is less soluble than sodium chloride (table salt) but dangerously soluble for the foundation of a dam. Mosul, a city of 2 million people below the dam could be hit by a 66 foot (20 meters) wall of water. The state department warns that half a million people could die and a million left homeless when the dam fails.

Mosul dam has required constant high maintenance since it was built, but occupation by ISIS disrupted the ongoing injection of grout to seal channels continuously forming in the dam’s foundation. Engineers have found extensive evidence of the connection of new channels formed by rock dissolution to ancient natural channels in limestone. The clay that was plugging those ancient channels may be washing away as the water flowing under high pressure erodes it and pushes open the channels. The Mosul dam may be beyond repair.

Engineers have recommended building a new dam below the failing dam to protect the people of Mosul, but time is running out. Dam failure could bring catastrophe beyond comprehension.
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Worse Than Isis. Mosul dam foundation dissolving. Half a million Iraqis could die State Dept. Warns (Original Post) eridani Jan 2016 OP
Sadly, I think nothing gets done. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #1
We're an incredibly stupid species, aren't we? deutsey Jan 2016 #2
Yes, we are. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #3
I disagree atreides1 Jan 2016 #7
Clarifying tazkcmo Jan 2016 #8
Nah. Dogs abandon their runts, kill their weak and roll in shit Orrex Jan 2016 #13
That is survival, not being an "asshole". Coventina Jan 2016 #22
Well, try doing those things the next time you're at the movies Orrex Jan 2016 #25
Well, what dogs have evolved to do for survival and we have evolved for survival is different. Coventina Jan 2016 #27
Very true, but consider: Orrex Jan 2016 #29
Oh I agree with you. No species is inherently noble. Although some are more cut-throat than others Coventina Jan 2016 #31
Saint Reagan Protalker Jan 2016 #5
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that he mentioned it before that Orrex Jan 2016 #26
The US response to Ebola was fantastic compared to the US response to AIDS in the 80's. 40,000 Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #9
Reagan and his ilk were more than just stupid when it came to AIDS deutsey Jan 2016 #12
Micturate, trickle down economics Protalker Jan 2016 #34
Obama ordered the military to respond before the man who brought ebola to the US karynnj Jan 2016 #32
I'm referring to how this was allowed to become a crisis by the world community deutsey Jan 2016 #33
Well, if there are two million ISIS members, is there a way to bait them all behind the dam? snooper2 Jan 2016 #15
IIRC this is the dam they have to pour concrete into daily underpants Jan 2016 #4
Funny how we think we can control water liberal N proud Jan 2016 #6
I wonder where infrastructure reinvestment figures on the caliphate's priority list BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #10
. . .nowhere unless god tells them personally, I suppose. . .n/t annabanana Jan 2016 #11
Yeah, time for Daesh to step up and prove it is a real government. Coventina Jan 2016 #19
Great article, eridani. Hussein ("a madman") and other dictators tend to get what they want, pampango Jan 2016 #14
I would love to see the specs on the dam that they build downstream Orrex Jan 2016 #16
I would think the plan is to build dam two dsc Jan 2016 #20
I would hope so, but might that not take years? Orrex Jan 2016 #21
An acquaintance of mine returned to Iran... meaculpa2011 Jan 2016 #17
"New dam" ?? WTF ? Draw the old dam's reservoir down ASAP !! eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #18
That's what I'm thinking. But I think ISIL controls Mosul, or closeupready Jan 2016 #23
Nutbag zealotry trumps rational thought, including engineering considerations. nt eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #30
two things EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #28
We have experience with dams built on substandard substrate: IDemo Jan 2016 #24

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
1. Sadly, I think nothing gets done.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:18 AM
Jan 2016

Even sadder, as a global collective, we could accomplish this toot sweet. Unfortunately, I'm sure there's a group out there that sees a benefit of 2 million people dying. It's rather sickening.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
2. We're an incredibly stupid species, aren't we?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:25 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 10:48 AM - Edit history (1)

We know shit like this is going to happen, we have the know-how to stop it from happening (or at least to diminish its impact when it does happen), and we do nothing.

When I heard President Obama going on last night about how we stopped the Ebola outbreak, I couldn't help but think: "Yeah, after we ignored it and the growing number of fatalities for months and then took action only after it began to appear in America."

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
3. Yes, we are.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:29 AM
Jan 2016

I truly believe that if we are re-incarnated then the ultimate rebirth would be as a dog.

atreides1

(16,068 posts)
7. I disagree
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:58 AM
Jan 2016

I don't think we'd rate that high on the scale...more like earth worms, instead of dogs!

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
8. Clarifying
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jan 2016

I mean to be a dog is the goal, not the reality. I do agree with you we fall woefully short.

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
13. Nah. Dogs abandon their runts, kill their weak and roll in shit
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:12 AM
Jan 2016

Everybody's an asshole, even dogs.

The goal you're identifying is the romantic ideal of a dog, but you might just as well aim for the romantic ideal of our own species.

Coventina

(27,084 posts)
22. That is survival, not being an "asshole".
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jan 2016

They kill (or drive away) the weak for the good of the pack.

The rolling in shit is to disguise their scent while hunting. Although, since evolution has taught them to seek out and love that aroma, they will sometime do it recreationally, to the dismay of dog owners.


Anyway, the bottom line is that Nature is often unkind, and breeds unkind behaviors in many species. We are one of the few who have evolved to recognize and value altruism. But we're a looooong way of making that a common goal for our species.

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
25. Well, try doing those things the next time you're at the movies
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jan 2016

See if you get called "a survivor" or "an asshole."

Dogs have spent millennia training us to accommodate them, so they've got that going for them.

I get what you're saying about altruism, though. A long was off indeed.

Coventina

(27,084 posts)
27. Well, what dogs have evolved to do for survival and we have evolved for survival is different.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jan 2016

Survival skills are unique to each species, which is why there are different species.

And, I think I have gone to movies where there were dogs disguised as humans.


Orrex

(63,185 posts)
29. Very true, but consider:
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

Modern dogs display the traits that we find laudable because we've been selectively breeding for those traits since prehistory. It's not that dogs scampered out of the forest with these behaviors; we've manufactured them over thousands of generations.

In fact, most of the traits that I've seen praised in dogs are the very traits that we've cultivated, whereas their less desirable habits (shit-rolling, runt-abandoning, etc.) are the ones that they brought to the table themselves, and we minimize those habits in a variety of ways. We even bend over backwards to justify dogs' worst behaviors by blaming them on cruel or inept humans. We like to imagine that these animals are inherently noble, but we're basically saying "let us praise what we have made."

Coventina

(27,084 posts)
31. Oh I agree with you. No species is inherently noble. Although some are more cut-throat than others
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

Nature is red in tooth and claw, as the poet said....

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
26. To be fair, I'm pretty sure that he mentioned it before that
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

The Great Communicator used to enjoy joking about AIDS-related deaths, being the sick, incompetent asshole that he was.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
9. The US response to Ebola was fantastic compared to the US response to AIDS in the 80's. 40,000
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 10:04 AM
Jan 2016

Americans had died before Reagan and his Republicans even bothered to mention it.
In Africa, the #1 killer is HIV/AIDS. Well over 100,000 people a month die in Africa from it. Every month. Here is a quick comparison from 2012, Ebola and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa:

"In the 39 weeks that the WHO has tracked the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, 3,338 individuals died from the virus – an average of about 86 deaths a week. HIV/AIDS alone claimed an average of 21,000 lives each week in 2012."


I'll add that US Ebola history is 11 cases, 2 deaths. US AIDS deaths, over 650,000.

Protalker

(418 posts)
34. Micturate, trickle down economics
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jan 2016

Reagan voodoo economics has pissed down for 40 years.
Love the word, from your Jesuit education?

karynnj

(59,500 posts)
32. Obama ordered the military to respond before the man who brought ebola to the US
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jan 2016

Now, obviously, having first class medical response everywhere in the world would be ideal, the fact is that once the extent of the threat was known by the state department, they started to look at what the response should be. If you look at the details of the US led world response, there are many complicated, interrelated parts. Someone did a lot of work determining what was needed and how to respond.

It was obvious, in a day of routine air travel, that something this big would spread around the world unless contained and eliminated in Africa. Witness AIDS, where there was no such response for decades.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
33. I'm referring to how this was allowed to become a crisis by the world community
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jan 2016

The US included.

There have been outbreaks before and mobilizations have responded quickly to contain them.

I was reading about this outbreak and how bad it was long before I remember it being mentioned in mainstream media in any significant way in the US.

There were many reasons for the outbreak spiraling out of control, from the lack of a modern healthcare infrastructure in that part of Africa, deforestation which has brought humans and diseased bats together, budget cuts at WHO, etc.

Or, in a word, given the deadly and highly contagious nature of the disease, stupidity on our part. We know how horrific and dangerous this disease is, and yet we cut budgets, deforest the land for a slimy buck, etc.

From the Washington Post:

So how did the situation get so horribly out of control?

The virus easily outran the plodding response. The WHO, an arm of the United Nations, is responsible for coordinating international action in a crisis like this, but it has suffered budget cuts, has lost many of its brightest minds and was slow to sound a global alarm on Ebola. Not until Aug. 8, 4 1 ? 2 months into the epidemic, did the organization declare a global emergency. Its Africa office, which oversees the region, initially did not welcome a robust role by the CDC in the response to the outbreak.

Previous Ebola outbreaks had been quickly throttled, but that experience proved misleading and officials did not grasp the potential scale of the disaster. Their imaginations were unequal to the virulence of the pathogen.

"In retrospect, we could have responded faster. Some of the criticism is appropriate," acknowledged Richard Brennan, director of the WHO's Department of Emergency Risk Management and Humanitarian Response. But he added, "While some of the criticism we accept, I think we also have to get things in perspective that this outbreak has a dynamic that's unlike everything we've ever seen before and, I think, has caught everyone unawares."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/10/04/how-ebola-sped-out-of-control/

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
15. Well, if there are two million ISIS members, is there a way to bait them all behind the dam?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jan 2016

Evacuate Mosul and drop leaflets saying there are thousands of 13 &14 year old girls waiting for them there?

underpants

(182,724 posts)
4. IIRC this is the dam they have to pour concrete into daily
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:33 AM
Jan 2016

I remember the stories from the beginning of the invasion. Surely there is a big fat contract they could have been awarded cost+. Oh that would have required planning and follow up.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
6. Funny how we think we can control water
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:45 AM
Jan 2016

And once and a while it will let us. But in the end, water goes where it wants to go and dissolves what it wants to.

Water is the giver and take or life.


Here is a collection of Dam failures to remind us that we can't always control water:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1414&bih=872&q=Engineering+dam+failures&oq=Engineering+dam+failures&gs_l=img.3...1964.11515.0.12393.24.14.0.10.3.0.168.1770.0j13.13.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..1.15.1670.bkCIIUciGoc

Coventina

(27,084 posts)
19. Yeah, time for Daesh to step up and prove it is a real government.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:45 AM
Jan 2016

However, I'm not gonna hold my breath.......



pampango

(24,692 posts)
14. Great article, eridani. Hussein ("a madman") and other dictators tend to get what they want,
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

no matter how stupid and dangerous their idea happens to be.

Plans to repair the dam have been delayed by Iraqi political infighting and the loss of skilled workers. Now, there may not be enough time to make repairs to prevent failure this year. The State department is warning Iraqis to make evacuation plans now because the dam could fail this spring when maximum river flow from snow melt adds pressure to the dam.

Hundreds of workers working 3 shifts a day 6 days a week were needed to maintain the dam, but ISIS drove those workers away. Many of them never came back. Moreover, ISIS is still in control of the source region for grout to repair the foundation. Meanwhile the rock under the dam continues to dissolve and wash away.

Even if the people can be evacuated in time to save half a million lives, a city of 2 million people may be destroyed by a massive flood. Right now there is no alert system in place. The Iraqi government claims to have an evacuation plan, but ISIS controls much of the higher ground below the dam so the plan may be impossible to implement. And Baghdad and millions more people live further downriver. The American embassy could be under 13 feet of water.

The water would continue along the Tigris, which runs by Tikrit and Samarra down to Baghdad, potentially knocking out bridges along the way, according to the administration’s analysis. As the water traveled south, debris, pesticides and corpses would become part of the flow, threatening the country’s supply of clean water and its irrigation system.

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
16. I would love to see the specs on the dam that they build downstream
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jan 2016

I'm not aware of any structure yet built that can withstand a fast-moving 66 foot wave of water full of shattered dam.

Orrex

(63,185 posts)
21. I would hope so, but might that not take years?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jan 2016

The clock's ticking, and it's not as though this is the most stable region at the moment, so I don't know if a years-long engineering project is a realistic goal.

Better to drain now in as controlled a fashion as possible.

meaculpa2011

(918 posts)
17. An acquaintance of mine returned to Iran...
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:27 AM
Jan 2016

after the revolution. He was a recent engineering grad and was immediately placed in charge of a large port project on the Persian Gulf.

After dredging, earth moving and laying in a large supply of construction materials an unusually high tide was caused by a full moon and planetary alignment washing it all away. That's the last we heard of him.

eppur_se_muova

(36,256 posts)
18. "New dam" ?? WTF ? Draw the old dam's reservoir down ASAP !!
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jan 2016

Shouldn't that be both the fastest and most effective way of diminishing the danger ?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
23. That's what I'm thinking. But I think ISIL controls Mosul, or
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

at least the dam. So how to work out personnel/logistics in a madhouse?

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
24. We have experience with dams built on substandard substrate:
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

Idaho's Teton Dam collapse, 1976. Eleven fatalities, not half-million. A nightmarish mess, nonetheless.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Worse Than Isis. Mosul da...