General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI would prefer Iran as an ally over Saudi Arabia...
...or just about any other Arab country in the Middle East.
As we have heard, countries do not have "friends", they have "interests".
I think it is in the interest of the US to be allied with Iran at this time. Since they have virtual control over the Baghdad government, they may need the US to help protect Baghdad from the ISIS forces in the future.
They were one of the biggest American allies before their revolution in 1978-79. Our CIA had been involved in Iran since at least the early fifties, with the overthrow of Mossadegh.
With the present chaos in the Middle East, it is probably to the benefit of all to have Iran as the balance of power in that area of the world?
The worst possible situation would be to have Iran in turmoil with the numerous other countries that are experiencing civil war at this time.
In my opinion, the Republicans have no idea what they are talking about.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Our alliance with Saudi Arabia is poisonous.
It's one of the biggest mistakes we made as country. One of.
It's also completely toxic to our political process.
Iran is a natural ally. Wahabbists are not.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Saudi Arabia, on the other hand was founded by glorified Bedouin barbarians who just happened to control the Islamic holy cities in the Hejaz and got buddy-buddy with the UK and made rich off of oil.
And these barbarians have used their oil money to fund the proselytizing of their barbaric Wahhabi interpretation of Islam, which has lead to modern Islamic terrorism.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Most highly educated country in the Mid East.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)I remember reading that even average uneducated working class stiffs in Iran can quote Rumi from memory.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Engineering. This scares the crap out of their neighbors who have kept their people ignorant.
Dretownblues
(253 posts)Just want to add that they where enabled to become more and more fundematalist by the Regan Administration and have run with it ever since.
moondust
(19,958 posts)I'm wondering if Iran is starting to inch away from theocracy, or if they might drift away as relations improve with the West.
JI7
(89,240 posts)Than the power Islam has over them.
They are also very kind .
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)until the Dulles Brothers overthrew Mossadegh on behalf of their friends/business associates at BP.
JI7
(89,240 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)newblewtoo
(667 posts)Iranians are Aryan and Saudi Arabians are Semitic. They both follow Islamic teaching but that is about the same as Christians being Catholics or Baptists in my book. Ike (and the CIA) is probably most responsible for farking up Iran back in 1953 for oil. Those unfamiliar with the coup may find this link an interesting
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/coup53/coup53p1.php
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Iran is a theocracy with a horrible human rights record that should not be overlooked.
JI7
(89,240 posts)leadership wants a change.
1939
(1,683 posts)They are Islamic, but want the secular life they enjoyed under the Shah
JI7
(89,240 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Read a book about that very topic by a former NY Times writer, maybe it was Steven Kinzer. He makes a good case. Iran was democratic once in its history and I predict it will be again within 20 years.
The KSA is the anus mundi in every way - worst country/government/religion/culture on the face of the planet and no, I am not forgetting about Kim Jun Cartman's North Korea.
edhopper
(33,482 posts)it's people are more open and would support a democracy.
But a Sadam like strong man could also emerge.
lostnfound
(16,162 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)We hear more and more of the the link between Saudi Arabia's extreme version of Islam and the connection to ISIS. Iran is the moderate force here, and as you point out, if we hadn't overthrown their popularly elected democracy in 1953 to install the Shah, they would probably like us a whole lot more. Just guessing.
Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)Might a further thawing of our relationship be possible? I would very much rather them than the Bedouin Barbarians in Saudi Arabia, who use us as nothing more than their military muscle.
rug
(82,333 posts)Governments can work on common interests, oppose each other on others.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Have you watched Antoine Bourdain - Parts Unknown? He had a whole episode on Iran.
They're definitely not any worse than SA. I'm so glad the restrictions were lifted, innocent were suffering because of em.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Iran was pretty friendly with the United States. There were many Iranian students here for college. It's difficult to imagine now, but Iran was fairly secular, and women could drive cars, appear unescorted in public, listen to rock music, show their legs, etc. If we can thaw our relations with them, they might get back some of that.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:22 PM - Edit history (1)
Problem solved. The Saudi Royals can seek refuge in Monaco and London where they already own most of the top end real estate.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)Getting too close to them is almost like having another Israel in that you're inviting the other countries in the area to hate you. The better idea would be to try to end the hostilities between them and the Saudis
Kennah
(14,234 posts)Not saying Iran doesn't have a lot of issues to resolve. Even Rouhani has said so. But I agree that Iran is a far better ally. Maybe I'm just allergic to monarchies.
Oneironaut
(5,486 posts)Saudi Arabia is probably worse, but the leadership of both is full of crazies. Iran in turmoil would be like opening Pandora's box, though.