Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Tamir Rice grand jury didn't vote
http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2016/01/20/the-grand-jury-in-the-tamir-rice-case-did-not-take-a-vote-on-chargesThe grand jury that opted not to indict Cleveland police officers Timothy Loehmann and Frank Garmback in the shooting death of Tamir Rice never actually took a vote on the matter, according to the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office.
What actually happened in the most significant grand jury hearing in county history isn't quite clear, and the mechanism by which the grand jury "declined to indict" in Prosecutor Timothy McGinty's own words is equally unclear.
At the conclusion of a typical grand jury hearing, there are two possible outcomes achieved via vote: a "true bill," which results in criminal charges and a case number in the court system, or a "no bill," which is a decision not to bring charges. A "no-bill notification" is signed and stamped and kept on record at the county clerk's office.
Though Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty never explicitly said the grand jury voted not to indict nor did he utter the phrase "no bill" in his Dec. 28 press conference, he declared that that grand jury had declined to indict.
How, then, if not by voting?
After learning and confirming on Jan. 15 that there was no "no-bill notification" on file at the county clerk's office for the Tamir Rice grand jury proceedings, Scene formally requested the document officially showing the decision, however it was reached, and wherever said document might be. We were told that it didn't exist. Employees at both the clerk's and prosecutor's officers were unable to explain the lack of paperwork.
end of quote
Much more at link.
Simply amazing.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 926 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Tamir Rice grand jury didn't vote (Original Post)
dsc
Jan 2016
OP
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)1. da fuck? tat's unbelievable nt
hard to know what they were thinking.
localroger
(3,620 posts)3. Without the no-bill vote, there effectively wasn't a grand jury
The GJ didn't "not indict," the GJ didn't come to any conclusion at all. As such, as with a hung jury, the coast remains clear to empanel another grand jury. The prosecutor probably sensed the vote might not go the way he wanted and was probably hoping nobody would notice, but that no-bill notice has to be filed or there's no record the GJ ever even met as far as the case is concerned.
Stinky The Clown
(67,757 posts)4. This shit has to end in this country.
Sadly, such shit has been going on for centuries. Nothing new here. The imperfections of an imperfect system. Right now it is the cop establishment (cops, prosecutors, judges, wardens, parole boards, etc.) that needs to be reformed.