Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, you coprophagic psychopathic Republicans, we want waiters to wash their hands after a dump (Original Post) Recursion Jan 2016 OP
I recall debating with a right winger treestar Jan 2016 #1
Ask him if he thinks that a restaurant could function if every patron demanded an inspection tour. drm604 Jan 2016 #3
Yep treestar Jan 2016 #8
sure they would.... phantom power Jan 2016 #12
Libertarians are delusional ideologues. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #21
Inspecting every restaurant himself -- what an idiot. Does he think he's gonna Nay Jan 2016 #23
Nasty bastard. lonestarnot Jan 2016 #2
I steerheaded what I call the clean hand glove law in ID bkkyosemite Jan 2016 #4
I hope somebody... 3catwoman3 Jan 2016 #5
They can opt out of the policy if they post a sign that says they opt out? Orangepeel Jan 2016 #6
Right. All it does is to make the regulation even more complicated. drm604 Jan 2016 #15
Let'em pass that law meow2u3 Jan 2016 #7
The Invisible Hand is filthy enough already n/t IDemo Jan 2016 #9
Would the Starbucks be REQUIRED to post a sign saying "We don't wash our hands here"? hatrack Jan 2016 #10
I hope they run with that one. Great idea! tk2kewl Jan 2016 #11
I would do my own inspection too sorefeet Jan 2016 #13
If you are unemployed does that mean ghostsinthemachine Jan 2016 #14
No and many people do not... Human101948 Jan 2016 #27
they should call it the Chipotle Memorial Eat **** Law n/t librechik Jan 2016 #16
He needs the trots for a solid year. Lars39 Jan 2016 #17
Coprophagic Psychopathic would be an awesome band name. geomon666 Jan 2016 #18
They can't think past the money Egnever Jan 2016 #19
Gawd why bother reading the Onion. Effing hysterical level of ignorance. snagglepuss Jan 2016 #20
Seriously. On Facebook three friends said "this is the Onion or Borowitz, right?" Recursion Jan 2016 #22
Nice photo of that fuckwit senator. Paladin Jan 2016 #24
they are all fucking insane. certifiably. spanone Jan 2016 #25
So, regulate that they have to post signs indicating whether they are hand washing prayin4rain Jan 2016 #26
This is NOT about hand washing. KentuckyWoman Jan 2016 #28
Seriously it's time to burn all Ayn Rand material. Initech Jan 2016 #29

treestar

(82,383 posts)
1. I recall debating with a right winger
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jan 2016

about the unregulated environment he advocated, and wondering whether he would eat in restaurants. He answers he would do his own inspection at every restaurant! Imagine going out to eat but first examining the kitchens, etc. And with only your own expertise.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
3. Ask him if he thinks that a restaurant could function if every patron demanded an inspection tour.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jan 2016

Would he insist on a seat near the bathroom and follow every employee that went in, both men and women, to make sure that they washed their hands?

That type of Libertarian society would be completely nonfunctional.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
8. Yep
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

Whatever answer they come up with is something they do not think through as to what life would really be like.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
12. sure they would....
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

And they'd personally inspect every farm and factory that made their food.
And they'd personally inspect every factory that made every single thing they buy, for safety.
And they'd personally inspect every bridge, every road....

Because they're all Galtian uber-menschen...

Nay

(12,051 posts)
23. Inspecting every restaurant himself -- what an idiot. Does he think he's gonna
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:37 PM
Jan 2016

SEE the fecal germs on all the countertops? The E. coli in the uninspected meats and veggies? The TB bacilli from the worker who has hacked and coughed through a whole shift?

God, these people are stupid.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
4. I steerheaded what I call the clean hand glove law in ID
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jan 2016

It took 10 years to come to be law because of the Republican's and the corporations in ID who did not want to go to the trouble of making sure their employees washed their hands after going to the bathroom and had a sink in the food area where they washed their hands before handing food. I saw terrible improper handling of food when I first started my quest. Sneezing right on food while preparing it, handling money then putting their hands on food, sick with temps and handling food, large amount of the public coming down with disease because of it. It was disgusting.

3catwoman3

(23,931 posts)
5. I hope somebody...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jan 2016

...pees in his coffee next time he is there. Urine is sterile when it first leaves the body, so hey, no problem, right?

Jesus H. Christ on toast.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
6. They can opt out of the policy if they post a sign that says they opt out?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jan 2016

Besides being 10 different other ways of stupid, are the big government regulators now going to ensure that every restaurant that opts out has a properly posted sign?

drm604

(16,230 posts)
15. Right. All it does is to make the regulation even more complicated.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:27 PM
Jan 2016

Currently you have to require employees to wash their hands. With Tillis' plan you have a regulation that says that you have to either require employees to wash their hands or you have to post a sign saying that you don't, and you have to have rules about the visibility of the sign, minimum type size, etc., and you'll need inspectors to assure that they're posting it correctly (or requiring hand washing).

Of course NO ONE would opt to use the sign instead so legislative time spent on changing the law would be a waste of taxpayer's money.

meow2u3

(24,757 posts)
7. Let'em pass that law
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

If I were a waitress, I'd sneak some shit in his dinner and there won't a goddamn thing he'll be able to do about it!

hatrack

(59,553 posts)
10. Would the Starbucks be REQUIRED to post a sign saying "We don't wash our hands here"?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

I can hear the jackboots of regulation stomping the sidewalk - can you?

Fucking RIDICULOUS.

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
13. I would do my own inspection too
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

I would walk straight to the bathroom and if I didn't see the "wash your hands" sign. I leave. Some people NEED to be reminded usually because of their upbringing. It's an educational tool.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
19. They can't think past the money
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

In this example he might be correct and the market indeed would take care of it in the end if a business decided to opt out of handwashing.

But it wouldn't happen immediately and there would certainly be many that got sick or died before the market took care of that business. Hell there are businesses that bleed money for years before ultimately going belly up. The people that would be harmed in the meantime don't count in the GOP

Flint is a perfect example of money meaning more than people to the GOP. Eventually the market (voters) will correct the complete fuckup they currently have for governor but it will be long after a whole lot of damage is already done.

prayin4rain

(2,065 posts)
26. So, regulate that they have to post signs indicating whether they are hand washing
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 03:17 PM
Jan 2016

establishment, but do not just regulate that they must wash their hands. Brilliant.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
28. This is NOT about hand washing.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

This is about legal responsibility and lawsuits. Corporate America doesn't want to be responsible if they hire some disgusting slob who doesn't wash up and then touches your food. They want to be able to force you to pay for the food and if you get sick, stop you from suing them for damages.

FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Initech

(100,013 posts)
29. Seriously it's time to burn all Ayn Rand material.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

This is taking Ayn Rand's anti government regulation bullshit to new extremes. No we don't want to eat shit when we go to restaurants.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, you coprophagic psych...