Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 03:23 PM Jan 2016

Moscow Times: Putin Requested Assad Step Aside, But Syrian Leader Refused

The head of Russia's military intelligence service, Colonel-General Igor Sergun, delivered a message late last year to Syrian President Bashar Assad on President Vladimir Putin's behalf — step aside. It was a request that Assad “angrily refused,” according to the Financial Times newspaper. Citing information provided by two unidentified Western intelligence officials, the FT reported that Sergun — who died unexpectedly on Jan. 3 — was rebuffed by a defiant Assad. The Syrian president warned Russia would not have a role in Syria's future if he left office.

The FT report signals a growing schism between Putin and Assad just over three months after Moscow launched a surprise aerial intervention in Syria's 4 ½-year-old civil war on the embattled president's behalf.

Though Russia has yet to publicly ditch Assad, as the United States and its Western allies have repeatedly urged it to do, intelligence officials in the West told the FT that Moscow has become alarmed at the depth of problems facing the Syrian regime.

The FT cited one businessman close to the regime in Damascus as saying that Assad's government has grown suspicious of Russia's intentions as well. “Assad's people started to realize that having the big brother defending them meant he could also demand things of them too.”

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/putin-requested-assad-step-aside-but-syrian-leader-refused/556576.html

May or may not be true. What is always true is that the big country (Russia, the US, China) is always out to protect its national interest. The local dictator (Vietnam, Syria, wherever) may be a means to that end for a while, maybe for a long while, but the end remains the same. The dictator is wise to remember this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Moscow Times: Putin Reque...