Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:18 AM Jan 2016

Why the sudden surge of "billionaires" wanting the White House?

There was a time that they kept their politics behind the doors. They did not want to make waves. If they needed a favor or a tax-break, they simply would go to their favorite politician. But they operated in a more quiet, diplomatic way.

Not anymore. Now they are so confident that they want to be in charge of signing their own tax breaks.

It shows how far we have come on our way to being an oligarchy. We are there and the number of billionaires running for the job or interested in the job only proves the point.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the sudden surge of "billionaires" wanting the White House? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2016 OP
Because unlimited wealth no longer has the "kick" StandingInLeftField Jan 2016 #1
some of it is pure ego lapfog_1 Jan 2016 #2
Hey . . . rich people need hobbies. Vinca Jan 2016 #3
To protect their interests...n/t monmouth4 Jan 2016 #4
That is it , in a nutshell etherealtruth Jan 2016 #11
They don't even need proxies anymore. n/t ronnie624 Jan 2016 #19
Boredom. They have everything else they want. n/t livetohike Jan 2016 #5
That And. . . ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #6
Cut Out The Middleman....nt global1 Jan 2016 #7
+1000 ^^^ n/t Binkie The Clown Jan 2016 #20
To protect their interests. SamKnause Jan 2016 #8
They saw the Koch's buy congress and are jealous randr Jan 2016 #10
They can afford to run oberliner Jan 2016 #12
Collection. HughBeaumont Jan 2016 #13
Just like the non-billionaires....they want the ultimate POWER. ileus Jan 2016 #14
It's a collector's item for the man who has everything. DetlefK Jan 2016 #15
They are cutting out the middleman. Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #16
Big egos? nt bemildred Jan 2016 #17
cuz they can afford it. And it's up for sale. n/t librechik Jan 2016 #18
Because things aren't tilted heavily enough in their favor gratuitous Jan 2016 #21
Wealth = power. Orsino Jan 2016 #22
You've always had some extremely wealthy people in the mix Johonny Jan 2016 #23
Because it's THERE . . . annabanana Jan 2016 #24

lapfog_1

(29,199 posts)
2. some of it is pure ego
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:23 AM
Jan 2016

"I've made all this money... therefore I'm unique and special"...

And some of it is simply removing the middle person... why depend on a politician to enact the laws you want (and paid for with contributions to people) when you can run and get elected yourself.

ProfessorGAC

(64,988 posts)
9. That And. . .
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:35 AM
Jan 2016

. . .accumulation of wealth becomes a contest to them. They've already won that game, so this is a new competition to test their own mettle.

Response to kentuck (Original post)

SamKnause

(13,091 posts)
8. To protect their interests.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:34 AM
Jan 2016

It is all out in the open.

Monopolies, price gouging, defective products, market manipulation, bailouts,

false advertisement, unregulated markets, unregulated interest rates, free trade, etc.

Who benefits from all these things ???

How many millionaires are enacting legislation on behalf of the billionaires ???

The 1% want total control !!!

They don't care how many people's lives are destroyed or how many die because of their greed.

I have little respect for people who hoard money when so many do without basic necessities or

the possibility to live in dignity.





HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
13. Collection.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jan 2016

Just another thing to add to their trophy cases.

Mitt tried unsuccessfully because he saw nothing wrong with demonizing the poor.

Eventually, that formula might just win people over if your electorate is dumb enough.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
21. Because things aren't tilted heavily enough in their favor
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jan 2016

Too much is never enough. That's what the haves who were running France late in the 18th Century thought, too.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
22. Wealth = power.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jan 2016

The kind of person who pursues one is likely to be enamored of the other, especially for the sheen of legitimacy.

Johonny

(20,829 posts)
23. You've always had some extremely wealthy people in the mix
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

From FDR to JFK, Perot, Forbes, Koch, and Romney have all run. Don't forget the personal wealth of our first president.

With a huge wealth gap and tons of idle rich... it seems only natural they are flooding into politics.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the sudden surge of "...