Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 09:40 AM Jun 2012

June 8, 1972: "Too hot! Too hot!"

AP 'napalm girl' photo from Vietnam War turns 40

Published May 31, 2012

Associated Press



TRANG BANG, Vietnam – In the picture, the girl will always be 9 years old and wailing "Too hot! Too hot!" as she runs down the road away from her burning Vietnamese village.

The little girl heard a roar overhead and twisted her neck to look up. As the South Vietnamese Skyraider plane grew fatter and louder, it swooped down toward her, dropping canisters like tumbling eggs flipping end over end.

Fire danced up Phuc's left arm. The threads of her cotton clothes evaporated on contact. Trees became angry torches. Searing pain bit through skin and muscle.

In shock, she sprinted down Highway 1 behind her older brother. She didn't see the foreign journalists gathered as she ran toward them, screaming. Then, she lost consciousness.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/31/shocking-ap-napalm-girl-photo-turns-40/
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
June 8, 1972: "Too hot! Too hot!" (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Jun 2012 OP
Yeah, America....USA! USA! rfranklin Jun 2012 #1
I share your feelings, but the napalm dropped in this coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #12
So, has anybody ever figured out what the conflict in Vietnam was really all about? Zorra Jun 2012 #2
To entice me to go madokie Jun 2012 #3
Kinda like now... keeping the US safe from the fearsome Taliban Air Force and Navy! nt Bigmack Jun 2012 #4
Exactly madokie Jun 2012 #7
A bund of career-level military officers got to punch coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #16
That's what they told me too. Then I heard about LBJ's ties to a company called Brown and Root.... Scuba Jun 2012 #19
Here's an excellent essay on the real reason we went into Vietnam: scarletwoman Jun 2012 #5
That is an excellent essay, thanks. nt Zorra Jun 2012 #11
Thanks for essay - we have not learned our lessons because they have not been taught enough. northoftheborder Jun 2012 #17
Post VietNam, Kissinger actually wrote what our other wars of imperialsim is all about: dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #18
Precisely!!! bvar22 Jun 2012 #20
Raiding the Treasury. Always number one reason for war. nt valerief Jun 2012 #10
Ronald Reagan called Vietnam coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #15
GRAPHIC WARNING: FOOTAGE OF MISTAKENLY NAPALMED VILLAGE, DO NOT WATCH THIS IF 2on2u Jun 2012 #6
That hurt me somewhere.. 99Forever Jun 2012 #8
I am reminded of what happened to the Italian journalist on her 2on2u Jun 2012 #9
She deserved it, because she was a terrorist disguised coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #13
And we can effortlessly post scenes from Afghanistan. rug Jun 2012 #14
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
12. I share your feelings, but the napalm dropped in this
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 11:29 AM
Jun 2012

episode was dropped by one of our puppets.

A small, technical distinction.

Now back to regular programming.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
2. So, has anybody ever figured out what the conflict in Vietnam was really all about?
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:04 AM
Jun 2012

Was it really just about making more profits for the 1%? I think that was the primary reason for the war.

Was there some population control that needed to be done?

What many don't know is that somewhere between 2,500,000 and 3.000,000 people were killed in that conflict.

The number of those maimed by the conflict was probably higher.

The psychological and emotional toll is inestimable, but in reality just as egregious.

WTF was it all about?

madokie

(51,076 posts)
3. To entice me to go
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:10 AM
Jun 2012

I and many of us was told that we had to stop the commies over there before they got over here.
I shit you not

madokie

(51,076 posts)
7. Exactly
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jun 2012

The years and the wars change but the reasons for remains the same. Which is mostly American Hegemony. IMO

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
16. A bund of career-level military officers got to punch
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 11:34 AM
Jun 2012

their tickets. I mean, really, where would Colin Powell be without My Lai?

(in case it's needed)

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
19. That's what they told me too. Then I heard about LBJ's ties to a company called Brown and Root....
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 01:39 PM
Jun 2012

... and that Brown and Root was making a fortune building airstrips, naval ports and other crap in Viet Nam.

That was my last day as a gung ho SSgt.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
5. Here's an excellent essay on the real reason we went into Vietnam:
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:25 AM
Jun 2012
Even now, we lie to ourselves about Vietnam

<snip>

The standard story in the United States about that war is that in our quest to guarantee peace and freedom for Vietnam, we misunderstood its history, politics and culture, leading to mistakes that doomed our effort. Some argue we should have gotten out sooner than we did; others suggest we should have fought harder. But the common ground in mainstream opinion is that our motives were noble.

But we never fought in Vietnam for democracy. After World War II, the United States supported and financed France's attempt to retake its former colony. After the Vietnamese defeated the French in 1954, the Geneva Conference called for free elections in 1956, which the United States and its South Vietnamese client regime blocked. In his memoirs, President Eisenhower explained why: In free elections, the communists would have won by an overwhelming margin. The United States is all for elections, so long as they turn out the way we want.

The central goal of U.S. policy-makers in Vietnam had nothing to do with freedom for the Vietnamese people, but instead was to make sure that an independent socialist course of development did not succeed. U.S. leaders invoked Cold War rhetoric about the threat of the communist monolith but really feared that a "virus" of independent development might infect the rest of Asia, perhaps even becoming a model for all the Third World.

To prevent the spread of the virus, we dropped 6.5 million tons of bombs and 400,000 tons of napalm on the people of Southeast Asia. Saturation bombing of civilian areas, counterterrorism programs and political assassination, routine killings of civilians and 11.2 million gallons of Agent Orange to destroy crops and ground cover -- all were part of the U.S. terror war in Vietnam, as well as Laos and Cambodia.

<snip>




dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
18. Post VietNam, Kissinger actually wrote what our other wars of imperialsim is all about:
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jun 2012

Remember Kissinger and his attitude to what he called "useless eaters"?

From Wiki...
.National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.

It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975. It was originally classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.

The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development. The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries, to control rapid population growth which the US deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the "U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad", and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States. It recommends the US leadership to "influence national leaders" and that "improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the U.N., USIA, and USAID."

Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.


Much more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200

The entire Memorandum is downloadable as a pdf on the Wiki page.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
20. Precisely!!!
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 02:19 PM
Jun 2012
"The central goal of U.S. policy-makers in Vietnam had nothing to do with freedom for the Vietnamese people, but instead was to make sure that an independent socialist course of development did not succeed."


This is STILL our EXACT Foreign Policy in Latin America.
Colombia, which has one of the worst Right Wing Human Rights Violating governments in Latin America is the 3rd Largest recipient of US Foreign Aid.
The bi-partisan policy of the US Government is to DEMONIZE, CONDEMN, and ELIMINATE the transparent Populist Democracies that are emerging in Central & South America.
We should be helping these young Democracies instead of driving them into the arms of Iran, Russia, and China.
We WILL Reap the Whirlwind for our shortsighted Foreign Policy in Latin America.


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
 

2on2u

(1,843 posts)
6. GRAPHIC WARNING: FOOTAGE OF MISTAKENLY NAPALMED VILLAGE, DO NOT WATCH THIS IF
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jun 2012

YOU CANNOT HANDLE EXTREME EMOTIONALLY DISTURBING IMAGES.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
8. That hurt me somewhere..
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:33 AM
Jun 2012

.. deep down inside. Thank you for reminding me why I absolutely hate the War Machine and all of it's parts.

 

2on2u

(1,843 posts)
9. I am reminded of what happened to the Italian journalist on her
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:45 AM
Jun 2012

way to the Baghdad airport. AGAIN GRAPHIC WARNING:



There have several cases in which white phosphorus (WP) has been used as an anti-personnel weapon in Iraq by the United States military. Although initially denied, its use by the US was later confirmed by a United States army general serving in Iraq. General Pace, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff denied allegations that the weapon was used against civilians, maintaining that it was only targeted on insurgents.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»June 8, 1972: "Too h...